DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO,
Defendant.
Case No. 17-cv-6260
Judge Robert M. Dow Jr.
CONSENT DECREE
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
i
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
II. COMMUNITY POLICING................................................................................................ 2
A. Guiding Principles .................................................................................................. 2
B. Community Policing Advisory Panel ..................................................................... 3
C. Problem-Solving Measures..................................................................................... 4
D. Community Partnerships......................................................................................... 6
E. Interactions with Youth........................................................................................... 8
F. Community Policing Training ................................................................................ 9
G. School-Assigned Officers..................................................................................... 10
H. Ongoing Assessment and Improvement ............................................................... 12
III. IMPARTIAL POLICING................................................................................................. 13
A. Guiding Principles ................................................................................................ 13
B. Impartial Policing Policies and Procedures .......................................................... 14
1. General Policies and Procedures............................................................... 14
2. Providing Police Services to Diverse Communities................................. 15
C. Impartial Policing Training................................................................................... 19
D. Hate Crimes .......................................................................................................... 20
E. Ongoing Assessment and Improvement ............................................................... 20
IV. CRISIS INTERVENTION................................................................................................ 21
A. Guiding Principles ................................................................................................ 21
B. Crisis Intervention Team Program........................................................................ 22
C. Certified CIT Officer Designation........................................................................ 25
D. Certified CIT Officer Implementation Plan and Response to Incidents............... 28
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
ii
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
E. CIT Coordinator.................................................................................................... 31
F. Crisis Intervention Reporting and Data ................................................................ 32
G. Crisis Intervention Plan......................................................................................... 34
H. Non-CIT Crisis Intervention Training.................................................................. 36
I. Advisory Committee............................................................................................. 37
J. Crisis Intervention Policies................................................................................... 39
K. Crisis Intervention-Related Call Intake and Dispatch .......................................... 39
V. USE OF FORCE............................................................................................................... 42
A. Objectives ............................................................................................................. 43
B. Use of Force Policies............................................................................................ 44
1. General Policy Requirements ................................................................... 45
2. Policies Regarding Specific Weapons...................................................... 49
a. Firearms ........................................................................................ 49
b. Electronic Control Weapons (“Tasers”) ....................................... 50
c. Oleoresin Capsicum Devices (“OC Devices”) ............................. 53
d. Impact Weapons............................................................................ 54
C. Reporting Uses of Force ....................................................................................... 55
D. Supervisory Review of Reportable Uses of Force................................................ 59
E. Body-Worn Cameras ............................................................................................ 61
F. Use of Force Training........................................................................................... 63
VI. RECRUITMENT, HIRING, AND PROMOTION........................................................... 65
A. Guiding Principles ................................................................................................ 65
B. Policies and Practices............................................................................................ 66
C. Recruitment and Hiring......................................................................................... 67
D. Sergeant and Lieutenant Promotions.................................................................... 68
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
iii
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
E. Captain and Commander Promotions................................................................... 69
VII. TRAINING....................................................................................................................... 69
A. Guiding Principles ................................................................................................ 69
B. Training Plan......................................................................................................... 70
C. Training Development and Delivery .................................................................... 73
D. Instructor Selection and Development.................................................................. 74
E. Training Evaluation .............................................................................................. 76
F. Training Records................................................................................................... 76
G. Recruit Training.................................................................................................... 78
H. Field Training and Evaluation Program................................................................ 79
I. In-Service Training Program ................................................................................ 83
J. Supervisory Training ............................................................................................ 87
K. Training on this Agreement.................................................................................. 90
VIII. SUPERVISION................................................................................................................. 91
A. Guiding Principles ................................................................................................ 91
B. Responsibilities and Duties................................................................................... 92
C. Staffing, Allocation, and Deployment.................................................................. 95
1. Generally................................................................................................... 95
2. Unity of Command and Span of Control.................................................. 96
D. Performance Evaluation........................................................................................ 98
IX. OFFICER WELLNESS AND SUPPORT...................................................................... 100
A. Guiding Principles .............................................................................................. 100
B. Expanding and Improving Officer Support Systems.......................................... 101
1. Officer Support Systems Plan................................................................. 101
2. Clinical Mental Health Services ............................................................. 105
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
iv
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
3. Alcohol and Other Addiction Services................................................... 107
4. Peer Support Program............................................................................. 107
5. Chaplains Unit ........................................................................................ 109
6. Traumatic Incident Response.................................................................. 110
7. Training................................................................................................... 111
C. Equipment and Technology................................................................................ 112
X. ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY........................................................... 113
A. Guiding Principles .............................................................................................. 113
B. Receiving and Tracking Misconduct Complaints............................................... 114
1. Receiving Complaints............................................................................. 114
2. Classifying and Tracking Investigations................................................. 118
3. Communicating with Complainants and CPD Members........................ 122
C. Disciplinary Investigations ................................................................................. 125
1. Investigative Practices ............................................................................ 126
a. Preliminary Investigations.......................................................... 126
b. Misconduct Investigations.......................................................... 128
2. Officer-Involved Shootings and Deaths.................................................. 137
3. Accountability Sergeants........................................................................ 139
4. Supervisory Review and Analysis of Investigations .............................. 141
5. Investigation Findings and Recommendations....................................... 143
D. Case Management System.................................................................................. 144
E. Community Mediation of Complaints................................................................ 146
F. Final Disciplinary Decision ................................................................................ 147
G. Staffing and Equipment Needs ........................................................................... 148
H. Training............................................................................................................... 149
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
v
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
I. Police Board........................................................................................................ 151
J. Transparency and Trend Analysis ...................................................................... 155
1. CPD Transparency and Annual Report................................................... 155
2. BIA and COPA Transparency and Reporting......................................... 159
3. Police Board............................................................................................ 162
4. Deputy Inspector General for Public Safety........................................... 163
K. CPD Policy Recommendations........................................................................... 164
XI. DATA COLLECTION, ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT..................................... 165
A. Guiding Principles .............................................................................................. 165
B. Use of Force Data Collection, Review, and Auditing ........................................ 166
C. Publication of Data Regarding Reportable Uses of Force.................................. 171
D. Early Intervention System................................................................................... 172
E. Data Systems Plan............................................................................................... 179
XII. IMPLEMENTATION, ENFORCEMENT, AND MONITORING................................ 181
A. Independent Monitor........................................................................................... 181
B. Selection and Compensation of the Monitor ...................................................... 182
C. Review of CPD Policies and Procedures............................................................ 186
D. Review of Implementation Plans and Training Materials .................................. 190
E. Compliance Reviews and Audits........................................................................ 192
F. Community Surveys............................................................................................ 193
G. Monitoring Plan and Review Methodology........................................................ 195
H. Monitoring Technical Assistance and Recommendations.................................. 195
I. Comprehensive Assessment................................................................................ 196
J. Coordination with the Office of Inspector General ............................................ 198
K. Communication Among the Monitor, the Parties, and the Public...................... 199
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
vi
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
L. Public Statements, Testimony, Records, and Conflict of Interest ...................... 200
M. CPD Consent Decree Implementation................................................................ 201
N. Implementation Assessment and Report............................................................. 201
O. Access and Confidentiality................................................................................. 202
P. Court Jurisdiction, Modification of the Agreement, and Enforcement .............. 204
Q. Scope of the Agreement...................................................................................... 207
R. Other Relevant Agreements................................................................................ 209
S. Termination of the Agreement............................................................................ 211
XIII. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................... 213
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
1
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
I. INTRODUCTION
1. The State of Illinois (“State”) and the City of Chicago (“City”) (collectively, the
“Parties”) hereby enter into this consent decree (“Agreement”) on the terms and conditions set
forth below.
2. The State, the City, and the Chicago Police Department (“CPD” or the
“Department”) are committed to constitutional and effective law enforcement. In furtherance of
this commitment, the Parties enter into this Agreement to ensure that the City and CPD deliver
services in a manner that fully complies with the Constitution and laws of the United States and
the State of Illinois, respects the rights of the people of Chicago, builds trust between officers
and the communities they serve, and promotes community and officer safety. In addition, this
Agreement seeks to ensure that Chicago police officers are provided with the training, resources,
and support they need to perform their jobs professionally and safely. This Agreement requires
changes in the areas of community policing; impartial policing; crisis intervention; use of force;
recruitment, hiring, and promotions; training; supervision; officer wellness and support;
accountability and transparency; and data collection, analysis, and management.
3. On August 29, 2017, the State, by Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of
Illinois, filed a Complaint against the City pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the U.S. Constitution;
the Illinois Constitution; the Illinois Civil Rights Act of 2003, 740 ILCS 23/5; and the Illinois
Human Rights Act, 775 ILCS 5/5-102(C) (“the Complaint” or the “State’s Complaint”).
4. The Complaint alleged that CPD violates the Constitution, and state and federal
laws, by engaging in a pattern of using excessive force, including deadly force, in a manner that
disproportionately harms Chicago’s African American and Latino residents. The Complaint
sought to address allegations that CPD engages in a pattern and practice of civil rights violations
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
2
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
and unconstitutional policing and address recommendations and conclusions set forth by the U.S.
Department of Justice (“DOJ Report”) and the Police Accountability Task Force convened by
Mayor Rahm Emanuel (“PATF Report”).
5. The City has denied the claims in the Complaint. However, without admitting any
liability of any sort, because the City is committed to continual improvement in the delivery of
police services, and in order to avoid protracted and expensive litigation, the City publicly
committed to working with the State to negotiate and implement this Agreement.
6. In this Agreement, the City commits to ensuring that police services are delivered
to the people of Chicago in a manner that fully complies with the Constitution and laws of the
United States and the State of Illinois, respects the rights of the people of Chicago, builds trust
between officers and the communities they serve, and promotes community and officer safety.
The City also commits to providing CPD members with the resources and support they need,
including improved training, supervision, and wellness resources.
7. In negotiating this Agreement, the Parties have consulted with community
leaders, community members, police officers, police officer unions, civilian CPD members,
advocates, and other concerned individuals who offered meaningful insights and
recommendations for change. This Agreement reflects the broad input received by the Parties
from the diverse communities that make up the City of Chicago.
II. COMMUNITY POLICING
A. Guiding Principles
8. Strong community partnerships and frequent positive interactions between police
and members of the public make policing safer and more effective, and increase public
confidence in law enforcement. Moreover, these partnerships allow police to effectively engage
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
3
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
with the public in problem-solving techniques, which include the proactive identification and
analysis of issues in order to develop solutions and evaluate outcomes.
9. To build and promote public trust and confidence in CPD and ensure
constitutional and effective policing, officer and public safety, and sustainability of reforms, the
City and CPD will integrate a community policing philosophy into CPD operations that
promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of community partnerships and
problem-solving techniques.
10. CPD will ensure that its community policing philosophy is a core component of
its provision of police services, crime reduction strategies and tactics, training, management,
resource deployment, and accountability systems. All CPD members will be responsible for
furthering this philosophy and employing the principles of community policing, which include
trust and legitimacy; community engagement; community partnerships; problem-solving; and the
collaboration of CPD, City agencies, and members of the community to promote public safety.
B. Community Policing Advisory Panel
11. In 2016, the Superintendent commissioned the Community Policing Advisory
Panel (“CPAP”), made up of community members, CPD members, public safety policy experts,
practitioners, and researchers, to provide recommendations for improving CPD’s community
policing efforts. CPAP organized its recommendations around the following pillars:
a. sustainable relationships of trust between police and community;
b. a strong focus on engagement with the city’s youth;
c. standards for community policing initiatives so that these initiatives have
clearly-defined objectives and contribute to the overall community policing
effort;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
4
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
d. a structure that reinforces community policing in every aspect of policing;
e. robust community-oriented training for all members of the Department;
f. effective problem-solving exercised jointly with the community and other
City agencies; and
g. regular evaluation of the quality of community policing throughout the
Department.
12. In 2017, the Superintendent accepted CPAP’s recommendations, and CPD began
to implement some of the recommendations, namely, the creation of the Office of Community
Policing, which reports directly to the Superintendent and is responsible for overseeing the
implementation of CPD’s community policing efforts. CPD will, within 90 days of the Effective
Date, develop a plan, including a timeline, for implementing CPAP’s recommendations,
consistent with the requirements set forth in this Agreement.
C. Problem-Solving Measures
13. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will review and, to the extent
necessary, revise all relevant policies to clearly delineate the duties and responsibilities of the
Office of Community Policing and any other offices or entities that report to the Office of
Community Policing.
14. With the assistance of the Office of the Community Policing, CPD will ensure its
command staff develops crime reduction and problem-solving strategies that are consistent with
the principles of community policing. To achieve this outcome, CPD will:
a. within 180 days of the Effective Date, provide CPD’s command staff methods
and guidance, in writing, for ensuring that department-wide and district-level
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
5
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
crime reduction strategies are consistent with the principles of community
policing;
b. require CPD’s command staff to review department-wide and district-level
crime reduction strategies implemented under their command, as appropriate,
in order to ensure they incorporate problem-solving techniques and are
consistent with the principles of community policing; and
c. designate the Deputy Chief of the Office of Community Policing to review
and provide written feedback on implemented department-wide and district-
level crime reduction strategies, excluding operational strategies that are
determined on a day-to-day or short term basis, to ensure they are community-
oriented and consistent with the principles of community policing.
15. CPD Bureau of Patrol Area Deputy Chiefs and District Commanders will
regularly review district efforts and strategies for building community partnerships and using
problem-solving techniques.
16. The overall effectiveness of CPD’s department-wide and district-level crime
reduction strategies will be determined by a reduction in crime and not by the number of arrests,
stops, or citations.
17. The City will establish and coordinate regular meetings, at minimum quarterly,
with representatives from City departments, sister agencies, and CPD to collaborate on
developing strategies for leveraging City resources to effectively and comprehensively address
issues that impact the community’s sense of safety, security, and well-being. The City
departments and agencies will include, but not be limited to, the Department of Streets and
Sanitation, the Department of Buildings, the Chicago Fire Department, the Department of
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
6
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Business Affairs and Consumer Protection, the Mayor’s Office for People with Disabilities, the
Department of Public Health, the Department of Family and Support Services, the Chicago
Public Schools, the Chicago Housing Authority, and the Chicago Park District. If after two years
the City concludes that less frequent meetings would be more effective, it may propose an
alternative schedule subject to Monitor approval.
18. CPD will ensure that officers are provided with information regarding the
communities they serve, including their assets and challenges, community groups and leaders,
and business, residential, and demographic profiles.
19. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop and institute a policy
prohibiting the transport of individuals with the intent to display or leave them in locations where
known rivals or enemies live or congregate.
D. Community Partnerships
20. Strong partnerships between CPD and the community enable law enforcement to
build and strengthen trust, identify community needs, and produce positive policing outcomes.
21. CPD will encourage and create opportunities for CPD members to participate in
community activities and have positive interactions with the community, including those that
extend beyond the context of law enforcement duties.
22. CPD has established and will continue and build upon a variety of community
partnerships and engagement strategies designed to encourage positive community interactions,
such as Bridging the Divide, Officer Friendly, and youth mentorship and engagement programs.
23. Each district will identify and maintain collaborative partnerships with
community stakeholders to serve the specific needs of the community. District representatives
will meet, as appropriate, with residential, business, religious, civic, educational, youth, and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
7
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
other community-based groups to proactively maintain these relationships and identify and
address community problems and needs.
24. CPD will meet with members of the community from each beat and District
Advisory Committee members at least once every two months. These community meetings will
be scheduled in consultation with the community, be used to identify problems and other areas of
concern in the community, and provide an opportunity to discuss responses and solutions
through problem-solving tactics and techniques.
25. CPD’s Office of Community Policing will designate CPD members, as needed, to
serve as points of contact for organizations to assist with access to police services, including
those serving communities that have experienced previous challenges with access to police
services, such as LGBTQI individuals, religious minorities, immigrants, individuals with
disabilities, homeless individuals, and survivors of sexual assault and domestic violence. The
designated CPD members will provide feedback to the Deputy Chief of the Office of Community
Policing about the issues or potential policy recommendations raised by community-based
organizations or the community in order to improve access to police services.
26. CPD will facilitate relationships with youth by establishing regular meetings to
serve as opportunities to provide input to CPD about the issues affecting their lives and their
communities. CPD will partner with community-based organizations to identify strategies to
include participants that represent a racially, geographically, and socio-economically diverse
cross section of Chicago youth, including, but not limited to, at-risk youth and youth who have
been arrested, incarcerated, or otherwise involved in the criminal or juvenile legal systems.
27. CPD will, with the assistance of the Office of Community Policing, institute a
public service announcement campaign to inform the public, at least once a year, about: (a) CPD
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
8
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
policies most relevant to police interactions with the public, including, but not limited to: use of
force, body worn cameras, and Tasers; (b) steps for filing a complaint against CPD or a CPD
member; and (c) the public’s rights when stopped, arrested, or interrogated by police. CPD’s
public service announcement campaign may include presentations, trainings, written guides, or
web-accessible videos.
28. CPD will prominently display signs both in rooms of police stations or other CPD
locations that hold arrestees or suspects and near telephones which arrestees or suspects have
access to. These signs will state:
a. that arrestees and suspects have the right to an attorney;
b. that if an arrestee cannot afford an attorney, one may be appointed by the
court for free; and
c. the telephone numbers for the Cook County Public Defender, and any other
organization appointed by the Cook County Circuit Court to represent
arrestees.
E. Interactions with Youth
29. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will review and revise its current
policies relating to youth and children and, within 365 days, will revise its training, as necessary,
to ensure that CPD provides officers with guidance on developmentally appropriate responses to,
and interactions with, youth and children, consistent with the provisions of this Agreement and
as permitted by law.
30. When interacting with youth and children, CPD will, as appropriate and permitted
by law, encourage officers to exercise discretion to use alternatives to arrest and alternatives to
referral to juvenile court, including, but not limited to: issuing warnings and providing guidance;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
9
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
referral to community services and resources such as mental health, drug treatment, mentoring,
and counseling organizations, educational services, and other agencies; station adjustments; and
civil citations.
31. If a juvenile has been arrested, and subsequently searched or handcuffed, CPD
will notify the juvenile’s parent or guardian as soon as possible. The notification may either be in
person or by telephone and will be documented in any relevant reports, along with the identity of
the parent or guardian who was notified. Officers will document in the arrest or incident report
attempts to notify a parent or guardian.
32. When determining whether or not to apply handcuffs or other physical restraints
on a juvenile, CPD officers will consider the totality of the circumstances, including, but not
limited to, the nature of the incident and the juvenile’s age, physical size, actions, and conduct,
when known or objectively apparent to a reasonable officer, and whether such restraints are
necessary to provide for the safety of the juvenile, the officer, or others.
F. Community Policing Training
33. Consistent with the requirements set forth in the Training section of this
Agreement, CPD will incorporate the philosophy of community policing into its annual in-
service training for all officers, including supervisors and command staff, by providing training
on the following topics:
a. an overview of the philosophy and principles of community policing,
consistent with this Agreement;
b. methods and strategies for establishing and strengthening community
partnerships that enable officers to work with communities to set public safety
and crime prevention priorities and to create opportunities for positive
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
10
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
interactions with all members of the community, including, but not limited to,
youth, people of color, women, LGBTQI individuals, religious minorities,
immigrants, individuals with limited English proficiency, homeless
individuals, and individuals with disabilities;
c. problem-solving tactics and techniques;
d. information about adolescent development and techniques for positive
interactions with youth; and
e. effective communication and interpersonal skills.
G. School-Assigned Officers
34. Through inter-governmental agreements between CPD and Chicago Public
Schools (“CPS”), CPD has assigned officers to work in CPS schools. In the event that CPD and
CPS decide to continue this practice, officers assigned to work in CPS schools will be
appropriately vetted, trained, and guided by clear policy in order to cultivate relationships of
mutual respect and understanding, and foster a safe, supportive, and positive learning
environment for students.
35. Before the 2019-2020 school year begins, in consultation with CPS, CPD will
develop and implement screening criteria to ensure that all officers assigned to work in CPS
schools have the qualifications, skills, and abilities necessary to work safely and effectively with
students, parents and guardians, and school personnel. Only CPD officers who satisfy the
screening criteria will be assigned to work in CPS schools.
36. Before the 2019-2020 school year begins, in consultation with CPS, CPD will
develop a policy that clearly defines the role of officers assigned to work in CPS schools. This
policy will be reviewed by the Monitor by the end of 2019. Any suggested revisions by the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
11
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Monitor that are adopted by CPD will be implemented by CPD before the 2020-2021 school
year. The policy will reflect best practices and will include, but not be limited to:
a. the duties, responsibilities, and appropriate actions of officers assigned to
work in CPS schools and school personnel, including an express prohibition
on the administration of school discipline by CPD officers;
b. selection criteria for officers assigned to work in CPS schools;
c. the requirement that officers assigned to work in CPS school receive initial
and refresher training; and
d. the collection, analysis, and use of data regarding CPD activities in CPS
schools.
37. CPD will, within 60 days of the completion of the 2019-2020 school year, and on
an annual basis thereafter, review and, to the extent necessary, revise its policies and practices
regarding officers assigned to work in CPS schools to ensure they are responsive to the needs of
the Department, CPS, and its students. This evaluation will include input from CPD members,
including officers assigned to work in CPS schools, school personnel, families, students, and
community stakeholders.
38. CPD officers assigned to work in CPS schools will receive specialized initial and
annual refresher training that is adequate in quality, quantity, scope, and type, and that addresses
subjects including, but not limited to, school-based legal topics, cultural competency, problem-
solving, de-escalation, use of restorative approaches, youth development, and crisis intervention.
The training will be developed and delivered in accordance with the requirements of the Training
section of this Agreement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
12
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
39. The initial training provided before the 2019-2020 school year will be reviewed
by the Monitor by the end of 2019. Any suggested revisions by the Monitor that are adopted by
CPD will be implemented by CPD before the 2020-2021 school year.
40. Before the 2019-2020 school year begins, CPD will undertake best efforts to enter
into a memorandum of understanding with CPS, to clearly delineate authority and specify
procedures for CPD officer interactions with students while on school grounds, consistent with
the law, best practices, and this Agreement.
H. Ongoing Assessment and Improvement
41. By January 1, 2020, and annually thereafter, District Commanders will review
their district’s policing strategies, with input from the District Advisory Committees and the
Office of Community Policing, to ensure the strategies are consistent with the principles of
community policing. This review will include, but not be limited to:
a. reviewing available district resources and personnel assignments;
b. identifying methods to support their district’s ability to effectively problem-
solve, including collaborating with City departments, services, and sister
agencies; and
c. identifying district-level CPD members, as needed, to assist members of the
community with access to police and City services, including community
members who have experienced previous challenges, such as LGBTQI
individuals, religious minorities, immigrants, individuals with disabilities,
individuals in crisis, homeless individuals, and survivors of sexual assault and
domestic violence.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
13
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
42. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, and as appropriate thereafter, CPD will
solicit, consider, and respond to input, feedback, and recommendations from the community in
each district about its policing efforts and strategies. Such practices may include, but are not
limited to, direct surveys, community meetings, beat community meetings, and engagement
through social media. CPD will identify strategies for soliciting input from individuals that
reflect a broad cross section of the community each district serves.
43. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop procedures to annually
evaluate the effectiveness of the Department’s efforts and strategies for building community
partnerships and using problem-solving techniques aimed at reducing crime and improving
quality of life. CPD will determine any necessary adjustments based on its annual evaluation.
44. CPD will create opportunities to highlight, reward, and encourage officer,
supervisory, and district performance on furthering community partnerships, engaging in
problem-solving techniques, effective use of de-escalation, exemplary and effective supervision,
and implementing community-oriented crime prevention strategies.
III. IMPARTIAL POLICING
A. Guiding Principles
45. The Parties agree that policing fairly, with courtesy and dignity, and without bias
is central to promoting broad community engagement, fostering public confidence in CPD, and
building partnerships between law enforcement and members of the Chicago community that
support the effective delivery of police services.
46. In conducting its activities, CPD will provide police services to all members of
the public without bias and will treat all persons with the courtesy and dignity which is
inherently due every person as a human being without reference to stereotype based on race,
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
14
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
color, ethnicity, religion, homeless status, national origin, immigration status, gender identity or
expression, sexual orientation, socio-economic class, age, disability, incarceration status, or
criminal history.
47. CPD will ensure its members have clear policy, training, and supervisory
direction in order to provide police services in a manner that promotes community trust of its
policing efforts and ensures equal protection of the law to all individuals.
B. Impartial Policing Policies and Procedures
1. General Policies and Procedures
48. In developing or revising policies and training referenced in this section, CPD
will seek input from members of the community and community-based organizations with
relevant knowledge and experience.
49. CPD will, consistent with this Agreement, ensure that its policies and practices
prohibit discrimination on the basis of any protected class under federal, state, and local law,
including race, color, sex, gender identity, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry,
sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, military status, source of income, credit history,
criminal record, or criminal history. CPD’s policies and practices will prohibit retaliation
consistent with Section 6-101 of the Illinois Human Rights Act (eff. Jan, 1, 2015) and Section 2-
160-100 of the Municipal Code of Chicago (amended Oct. 11, 2017).
50. CPD will continue to require that all CPD members interact with all members of
the public in an unbiased, fair, and respectful manner. CPD will require that officers refrain from
using language or taking action intended to taunt or denigrate an individual, including using
racist or derogatory language.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
15
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
51. CPD will prohibit officers from using race, ethnicity, color, national origin,
ancestry, religion, disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, immigration status,
homeless status, marital status, parental status, military discharge status, financial status, or
lawful source of income when making routine or spontaneous law enforcement decisions, except
when such information is part of a specific subject description.
52. CPD will provide guidance, through training and supervision, that reinforces to
officers that substitutes or stereotypes for the demographic categories listed above in Paragraph
51, such as manner of dress, mode of transportation, or language ability, is prohibited when
making routine or spontaneous law enforcement decisions, except when such information is part
of a specific subject description.
53. CPD will continue to prohibit CPD members from posting, displaying, or
transmitting content that is disparaging to a person or group based on race, religion, sexual
orientation, or any other protected class on personal social media accounts.
54. Consistent with the requirements in the Accountability and Transparency section
of this Agreement and CPD policy, CPD will require that CPD members immediately report to a
CPD supervisor all incidents where they observe other CPD members who have engaged in
misconduct, including discrimination, profiling, or other bias-based policing.
2. Providing Police Services to Diverse Communities
55. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop and implement a policy
guiding officers’ interactions with members of religious communities. The policy will include,
but not be limited to, instruction on interacting and searching individuals with garments or
coverings of religious significance.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
16
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
56. CPD will review and, as necessary, revise its policies guiding CPD members’
interactions with transgender, intersex, and gender non-conforming individuals, including
protocols for arrests, pat downs and searches, transportation, and detention, in order to ensure
that, at a minimum:
a. terms are properly defined;
b. CPD members address individuals, using the names, pronouns, and titles of
respect appropriate to the individual’s gender identity as expressed or clarified
by the individual;
c. CPD members refer to individuals in documentation by the name and gender
identity as expressed or clarified by the individual, in addition to the
information provided on the individual’s government-issued identification;
d. where same-sex pat downs or searches are required by law or CPD policy,
CPD members will respect the gender identity as expressed or clarified by the
individual and not rely on proof of the individual’s gender identity, such as an
identification card, except when a pat down is immediately necessary and
waiting for an officer of the same gender would compromise officer or public
safety;
e. absent exigent circumstances, a transgender, intersex, or gender non-
conforming individual is not transported or detained with individuals of a
different gender, and that when determining the gender of that individual,
CPD members will respect the gender identity as expressed or clarified by the
individual and not rely on proof of the individual’s gender identity, such as an
identification card; and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
17
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
f. CPD members are prohibited from inquiring about intimate details of an
individual’s anatomy, or medical history, except as necessary to serve a valid
law enforcement purpose.
57. CPD will require that officers comply with CPD policies related to officer
response to allegations of sexual assault, sexual abuse, stalking, and domestic violence. All
officers will receive in-service training every three years to ensure CPD’s response to allegations
of gender-based violence is both effective and unbiased.
58. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop and implement a policy
that prohibits sexual misconduct by CPD members. The policy will be consistent with best
practices and applicable law and will provide definitions of various types of sexual offenses,
including those that are not criminal in nature.
59. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will review and, to the extent
necessary, revise its language access policy to provide meaningful access to CPD programs and
services for individuals who have a limited ability to speak, read, write, or understand English.
CPD will ensure that its language access policy provides timely and meaningful access to police
services for individuals with limited English proficiency (“LEP”). CPD will also require that
Department-authorized interpreters are used in accordance with CPD policy, including for the
provision of Miranda warnings. CPD will publish its language access policy on its website and,
consistent with the requirements of Paragraph 27 of the Community Policing section of this
Agreement, make the policy available to community-based groups serving LEP communities in
Chicago.
60. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, the City will designate a language access
coordinator who will coordinate with CPD and review CPD’s compliance with its language
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
18
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
access policy and Section 2-40 of the Municipal Code of Chicago. The City’s language access
coordinator will assess the effectiveness and efficiency of CPD’s policies on an ongoing basis
and will report to the Superintendent or his or her designee any recommendations to revise
policy, if necessary.
61. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, the Office of Emergency Management and
Communications (“OEMC”) will provide training to its police communication supervisors, call-
takers, and dispatchers (collectively, “tele-communicators”) that is adequate in quality, quantity,
type, and scope, and that addresses procedures consistent with CPD policy for responding to
calls requiring language access services.
62. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, and as necessary thereafter, CPD will
translate its language access policy into any non-English language spoken by a limited or non-
English proficient population that constitutes 5% or 10,000 individuals, whichever is less, in
Chicago, as outlined in Section 2-40-020 of the Chicago Municipal Code. CPD will publish
translated versions of its language access policy on its website.
63. Before January 1, 2020, CPD will review and, to the extent necessary, revise its
policies and practices for ensuring that individuals with physical, mental, or developmental
disabilities have meaningful access to CPD programs, services, and activities. These policies will
include, but not be limited to, specific procedures and responsibilities applicable to
circumstances in which CPD officers encounter persons with intellectual or developmental
disabilities, autism, dementia, blindness, deafness, hearing loss, and mobility disabilities.
64. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop a policy for transporting
arrested or detained individuals that requires CPD officers to notify OEMC of the start and end
of a transport and whether the individual is a juvenile or adult.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
19
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
C. Impartial Policing Training
65. The Parties recognize that training is a necessary component of impartial policing.
CPD will integrate the concept of impartial policing into related CPD training courses, including,
but not limited to, use of force courses, weapons training courses, and Fourth Amendment
subjects courses, when appropriate.
66. The Parties acknowledge that CPD has developed, with the aid of subject-matter
experts, a three-part course called Procedural Justice, which covers certain impartial policing
subjects including the principles of procedural justice, the importance of police legitimacy, and
the existence of and methods for minimizing the impact of implicit bias. By the end of the year
2020, all officers, including supervisors, will complete the Procedural Justice course.
67. Consistent with the requirements set forth in the Training section of this
Agreement, CPD will incorporate the concept of impartial policing into its annual in-service
training for all officers, including supervisors and command staff, by providing training on the
following topics:
a. CPD’s anti-bias and impartial policing policies, including, but not limited to,
the policies referenced in this section unless otherwise required;
b. refreshers of topics covered in Procedural Justice;
c. appropriate use of social media;
d. cultural competency training that prepares officers to interact effectively with
people from diverse communities including, but not limited to, people of
color, LGBTQI individuals, religious minorities, and immigrants;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
20
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
e. recognizing when a person has a physical, intellectual, developmental or
mental disability, including protocols for providing timely and meaningful
access to police services for individuals with disabilities; and
f. the specific history and racial challenges in the City of Chicago.
D. Hate Crimes
68. By January 1, 2020, CPD will review and, to the extent necessary, revise its
policies and procedures to ensure that allegations and complaints of hate crimes, as defined by
federal, state, and local law, are comprehensively investigated.
69. CPD will ensure that all officers receive in-service training every two years on
methods, strategies, and techniques for recognizing and responding to hate crimes, including
CPD's procedures for processing reports and complaints.
70. Within 180 days following the expiration of each calendar year of the term of this
Agreement, CPD will publish an annual report summarizing reported hate crimes and non-
criminal incidents motivated by hate during the previous calendar year (“CPD Hate Crime
Report”). The CPD Hate Crime Report will provide information regarding the total number of
reported hate crimes and non-criminal incidents motivated by hate, organized by type of crime,
classification of bias motivation, and disposition of hate crime investigations in each district.
E. Ongoing Assessment and Improvement
71. By April 1, 2020, and every year thereafter, CPD will conduct an assessment of
the relative frequency of all misdemeanor arrests and administrative notices of violation
(“ANOVs”) effectuated by CPD members of persons in specific demographic categories,
including race and gender.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
21
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
72. Prior to conducting this assessment, CPD will share its proposed methodology,
including any proposed factors to be considered as part of the assessment, with the Monitor for
review and approval. The Monitor will approve CPD’s proposed methodology provided that the
Monitor determines that CPD’s methodology comports with published, peer-reviewed
methodologies and this Agreement. Upon completion of the assessment, CPD will identify any
modifications to CPD’s practices to address the findings in the assessment and develop a
timeline for implementation, subject to Monitor review and approval.
73. If at any point, the City’s obligations under the August 6, 2015 Investigatory Stop
and Protective Pat Down Settlement Agreement (“ACLU Agreement”) terminate, CPD will
include all stops effectuated by CPD members that were subject to the ACLU Agreement in the
assessment required by this Part.
74. Nothing in this Part will be interpreted to require CPD to analyze statistical data
beyond that currently collected and maintained in electronic databases unless otherwise required
under this Agreement. In instances in which race or gender data is not maintained in an
electronic database, CPD may use geographic data in its assessment. For purposes of this
paragraph, information contained solely in a scanned PDF document or other image of a
document, and not otherwise collected and maintained in an electronic database, is not
considered data maintained in an electronic database.
IV. CRISIS INTERVENTION
A. Guiding Principles
75. CPD officers often serve as first responders to individuals experiencing a
behavioral or mental health crisis. These individuals may exhibit symptoms of known, suspected,
or perceived mental health conditions, including, but not limited to, mental illness, intellectual or
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
22
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
developmental disabilities, or co-occurring conditions such as substance use disorders. The
Parties acknowledge that having a mental illness, an intellectual or developmental disability, or
co-occurring condition does not mean an individual necessarily is in crisis, or that having a
mental health condition would necessarily be the reason for any crisis that requires police
involvement. However, it may need to be considered or warrant heightened sensitivity to ensure
an appropriate response. Therefore, individuals in the groups listed above will be collectively
referred to as “individuals in crisis” for the purposes of this Agreement.
76. A person may be a suspected individual in crisis based on a number of factors,
including, but not limited to, self-reporting; information provided by witnesses, family members,
or individuals requesting service; CPD’s previous knowledge of the individual; or an officer’s
direct observation.
77. The use of trauma-informed crisis intervention techniques to respond
appropriately to individuals in crisis will help CPD officers reduce the need to use force, improve
safety in police interactions with individuals in crisis, promote the connection of individuals in
crisis to the healthcare system, and decrease unnecessary criminal justice involvement for
individuals in crisis. CPD will allow officers sufficient time and resources to use appropriate
crisis intervention techniques to respond to and resolve incidents involving individuals in crisis.
To achieve these outcomes, the City and CPD will implement the requirements set out below.
B. Crisis Intervention Team Program
78. The Crisis Intervention Team (“CIT”) Program will continue to be responsible for
CPD’s crisis intervention response functions, including, but not limited to:
a. developing CIT strategy and initiatives;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
23
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
b. supporting officers in the districts who respond to incidents involving
individuals in crisis;
c. engaging the community and community stakeholders to raise awareness of
the CIT Program and issues involving individuals in crisis;
d. coordinating among City agencies that respond to individuals in crisis;
e. recruiting officers to apply for CIT training;
f. developing and delivering CPD’s Basic CIT Training and other CIT training,
including Advanced CIT (e.g., youth, veterans) and refresher trainings;
g. delivering roll call trainings and mental health awareness initiatives;
h. compiling and retaining the reports identified in Part F of this section and
collecting and maintaining the appropriate CPD data related to incidents
involving individuals in crisis to support and evaluate the effectiveness of the
CIT Program and CPD’s response to incidents identified as involving
individuals in crisis, including identifying any district-level and department-
wide trends;
i. coordinating data and information sharing with OEMC; and
j. communicating with and soliciting feedback from crisis intervention-related
community stakeholders, Certified CIT Officers, and OEMC call-takers and
dispatchers regarding the effectiveness of CPD’s CIT Program.
79. The CIT Program will serve the functions of:
a. improving CPD’s competency and capacity to effectively respond to
individuals in crisis;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
24
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
b. de-escalating crises to reduce the need to use force against individuals in
crisis;
c. improving the safety of officers, individuals in crisis, family members, and
community members;
d. promoting community-oriented solutions to assist individuals in crisis;
e. reducing the need for individuals in crisis to have further involvement with the
criminal justice system; and
f. developing, evaluating, and improving CPD’s crisis intervention-related
policies and trainings to better identify and respond to individuals in crisis.
80. The CIT Program, through the CIT Coordinator, will annually review and, if
necessary, revise its policies and practices to ensure the program’s compliance with the
responsibilities and functions of the CIT Program.
81. The City and CPD will ensure that the CIT Program is provided with:
a. the resources and access to data and information necessary to fulfill the
responsibilities and functions of the CIT Program; and
b. a qualified, centralized staff, including supervisors, officers, and civilian
employees, that is necessary to oversee the department-wide operation of the
CIT Program, carry out the overall mission of the CIT Program, and perform
the responsibilities and functions of the CIT Program.
82. Additionally, the City and CPD will ensure that the CIT Program has sufficient,
dedicated district-level resources, consistent with the needs of each district identified by the
District Commander and the CIT Coordinator, and approved by the Chief of the Bureau of
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
25
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Patrol, as needed to carry out the overall mission and responsibilities of the CIT Program at the
district-level, which include, but are not limited to:
a. supporting officers in the district with incidents involving individuals in crisis;
b. delivering CIT Program-approved roll call trainings and mental health
awareness initiatives;
c. establishing relationships between the district and local service providers and
healthcare agencies;
d. referring and, when appropriate, connecting individuals in crisis with local
service providers;
e. engaging with the community to raise awareness of the CIT Program and
issues involving individuals in crisis; and
f. providing administrative support to the coordinator of the CIT Program.
C. Certified CIT Officer Designation
83. Certified CIT Officers are officers who receive specialized training in responding
to individuals in crisis. Certified CIT Officers retain their standard assignment and duties but
may also take on specialized crisis intervention duties and are prioritized to respond to calls in
the field identified as involving individuals in crisis, as assigned.
84. To be eligible for consideration as a Certified CIT Officer, applicants must have
at least 18 months of experience as a CPD officer and no longer be on probationary status. CPD
will assess each applicant’s fitness to serve as a Certified CIT Officer by considering the
applicant’s application, performance history, and disciplinary history.
85. Under the direction of the CIT Coordinator, supervisors and instructors teaching
crisis intervention-related topics will assist in identifying and recruiting qualified officers with
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
26
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
apparent or demonstrated skills and abilities in crisis de-escalation and interacting with
individuals in crisis to apply to receive CIT training.
86. Certified CIT Officers, at a minimum, must complete the specialized 40-hour
Basic CIT Training (“Basic CIT Training”) and receive CIT certification by the Illinois Law
Enforcement Training and Standards Board before being identified as a “Certified CIT Officer.”
To maintain the Certified CIT Officer designation, officers must receive a minimum of eight
hours of CIT refresher training (“CIT Refresher Training”) every three years and maintain the
eligibility requirements established by the CIT Program.
87. CPD’s Basic CIT Training is an in-depth, specialized course that teaches officers
how to recognize and effectively respond to individuals in crisis. In addition to the crisis
intervention-related topics covered in the training provided to all officers, the Basic CIT Training
will address signs and symptoms of individuals in crisis, suicide intervention, community
resources, common mental health conditions and psychotropic medications, the effects of drug
and alcohol abuse, perspectives of individuals with mental conditions and their family members,
the rights of individuals with mental conditions, civil commitment criteria, crisis de-escalation,
and scenario-based exercises.
88. CPD’s CIT Refresher Training is a specialized, advanced training to further
develop and expand Certified CIT Officers’ skills in recognizing and appropriately responding to
calls for service that involve individuals in crisis. The CIT Refresher Training will include a
review of the concepts, techniques, and practices offered in the Basic CIT Training as well as
relevant and/or emerging topics in law enforcement responses to individuals in crisis, general
and specific to CPD. Additionally, the CIT Refresher Training may cover the content included in
the in-service crisis intervention training.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
27
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
89. Certified CIT Officers may satisfy the in-service training requirements, as
outlined in Part H, by completing the CIT Refresher Training.
90. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, the CIT Program staff, in coordination
with the Education and Training Division will develop the CIT Refresher Training. The CIT
Program staff will review and revise the CIT Refresher Training as necessary to ensure that
Certified CIT Officers receive up-to-date training. The CIT Program will seek input from the
Advisory Committee in the development of the refresher training.
91. All Certified CIT Officers who completed the Basic CIT Training before the
development of the CIT Refresher Training must complete their first CIT Refresher Training
within four years of the date that the CIT Refresher Training is developed. All Certified CIT
Officers who complete Basic CIT Training on or after the date that the CIT Refresher Training is
developed must complete their first CIT Refresher Training within three years of receiving the
Basic CIT Training.
92. Certified CIT Officers who fail to complete the CIT Refresher Training within
three years of taking their most recently required CIT Training, whether the Basic CIT Training
or a prior CIT Refresher Training, will be deemed out of compliance with the CIT Program’s
CIT Refresher Training requirement. CPD will confirm on a quarterly basis that Certified CIT
Officers remain in compliance with the CIT Refresher Training requirement. Any Certified CIT
Officer found to be out of compliance during the quarterly review may not continue to be
identified by CPD as a Certified CIT Officer and may not continue to be prioritized to respond to
calls for service involving individuals in crisis. Each quarter, CPD will inform OEMC of officers
who are out of compliance with the CIT Refresher Training requirement. An officer out of
compliance with the CIT Refresher Training requirement must complete the most recently
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
28
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
offered version of the CIT Refresher Training before CPD may resume identifying the officer as
a Certified CIT Officer and before OEMC may resume prioritizing that officer to respond in the
field to calls involving individuals in crisis.
93. All newly assigned Field Training Officers (“FTOs”) and promoted Sergeants will
continue to receive the Basic CIT Training. To be considered Certified CIT Officers, FTOs and
Sergeants must meet the eligibility criteria and training requirements established by the CIT
Program and this Agreement.
94. The CIT Program staff responsible for the CIT training curriculum will, where it
would add to the quality or effectiveness of the training and when feasible and appropriate,
encourage and seek the participation of professionals and advocates who work with individuals
in crisis in developing and delivering CPD CIT trainings.
95. CPD will develop policies regarding the criteria for ongoing participation as a
Certified CIT Officer, consistent with this Agreement.
96. CPD will continue to maintain an up-to-date list of Certified CIT Officers,
including their unit of assignment.
D. Certified CIT Officer Implementation Plan and Response to Incidents
97. CPD will require that, when available, at least one Certified CIT Officer will
respond to any call for service identified as involving an individual in crisis. Certified CIT
Officers will continue to be prioritized for dispatch to incidents identified as involving
individuals in crisis, as assigned. CPD will review and revise the appropriate policies to ensure
that, in situations in which a Certified CIT Officer is not available to respond to a call or incident
identified as involving an individual in crisis, the responding officer engages in crisis
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
29
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
intervention response techniques, as appropriate and consistent with CPD policy and their
training, throughout the incident.
98. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, and quarterly thereafter, CPD will collect
and analyze the number of calls for service identified as involving individuals in crisis for every
watch in each district to evaluate the number of Certified CIT Officers needed to timely respond
to incidents and to assess the Department’s progress towards achieving the response ratio targets.
The number of Certified CIT Officers on each watch in every district will be driven by the
demand for crisis intervention services for the particular watch and district.
99. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop an implementation plan
(“CIT Implementation Plan”) based on, at a minimum, its analysis of the demand for crisis
intervention services for each watch in each district. The CIT Implementation Plan will identify
the number of Certified CIT Officers necessary, absent extraordinary circumstances, to meet the
following response ratio targets:
a. a sufficient number of Certified CIT Officers to ensure that Certified CIT
Officers are available on every watch in each district to timely respond to at
least 50% of the calls for service identified as involving individuals in crisis,
absent extraordinary circumstances (“initial response ratio target”); and
b. a sufficient number of Certified CIT Officers to ensure that Certified CIT
Officers are available on every watch in each district to timely respond to at
least 75% of the calls for service identified as involving individuals in crisis,
absent extraordinary circumstances (“second response ratio target”).
100. The CIT Implementation Plan will further identify the steps that are necessary to
meet and maintain the initial response ratio target by January 1, 2020, and the second response
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
30
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
ratio target by January 1, 2022 and the strategies, methods, and actions CPD will implement to
make progress to timely achieve and maintain these response ratio targets.
101. Within 180 days of completing the CIT Implementation Plan, and annually
thereafter, CPD will submit a report to the Monitor and the Office of the Attorney General
(“OAG”) regarding the progress the Department has made to meet: (a) the number of Certified
CIT Officers identified as necessary to achieve the response ratio targets, and (b) the response
ratio targets (“Implementation Plan Goals”) identified in the Implementation Plan. The Monitor
and OAG will have 30 days to respond in writing to CPD’s progress report. The Monitor and
CPD will publish CPD’s report and the Monitor’s and OAG’s response, if any, within in 45 days
of the date CPD submitted the progress report to the Monitor and OAG.
102. Through the execution of the CIT Implementation Plan, CPD will ensure that it
maintains a sufficient number of Certified CIT Officers on duty on every watch of each district
to help ensure that a Certified CIT Officer is available to timely respond to each incident
identified as involving individuals in crisis, absent extraordinary circumstances.
103. If the Monitor determines that CPD has not made material progress toward
achieving the CIT Implementation Plan Goals during any given reporting period, CPD will
review and revise the CIT Implementation Plan as necessary to enable CPD to make material
progress to achieve the Implementation Plan Goals.
104. CPD will require that responding Certified CIT Officers will take the lead, once
on scene, when appropriate and with supervisory approval, if required by CPD policy, in
interacting with individuals in crisis. If an officer who is not a CIT-Certified Officer has assumed
responsibility for the scene, the officer will seek input from the on-scene Certified CIT Officer
on strategies for resolving the crisis, when it is safe and practical to do so.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
31
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
105. Certified CIT Officers will receive ongoing feedback from the CIT Program and
unit supervisors regarding their responses to incidents identified as involving individuals in
crisis.
E. CIT Coordinator
106. CPD has designated and will maintain a Certified CIT Officer, at the rank of
Lieutenant or above, with the sole responsibility to act as a Crisis Intervention Team Program
Coordinator (“CIT Coordinator”). The CIT Coordinator will work to increase the effectiveness
of CPD’s CIT Program, improve CPD’s responses to incidents involving individuals in crisis,
and facilitate community engagement between CPD and crisis intervention-related stakeholders.
107. The CIT Coordinator will receive initial and refresher professional development
training that is adequate in quality, quantity, type, frequency, and scope to prepare the CIT
Coordinator to take on the role and responsibilities of the CIT Coordinator, in addition to the
Basic CIT training.
108. The responsibilities of the CIT Coordinator will include, at a minimum:
a. developing and managing a uniform CIT Program strategy;
b. researching and identifying best practices to incorporate into CPD response to
individuals in crisis;
c. reviewing and, when necessary to meet the requirements of this Agreement,
enhancing the CIT training curricula;
d. selecting and removing Certified CIT Officers from the CIT Program
consistent with the requirements of this Agreement;
e. overseeing crisis intervention-related data collection, analysis, and reporting;
f. developing and implementing CPD’s portion of any Crisis Intervention Plan ;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
32
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
g. supervising CIT Program staff;
h. participating in the Advisory Committee;
i. encouraging the public recognition of the efforts and successes of the CIT
Program and individual Certified CIT Officers; and
j. regularly communicating and interacting with relevant CPD command staff to
recommend improvements to Department crisis intervention-related strategies,
staffing and deployment, policies, procedures, and training.
F. Crisis Intervention Reporting and Data
109. By January 1, 2020, CPD will require that, after responding to an incident
involving an individual in crisis, the assigned CPD officer completes a CIT Report, or any
similar form of documentation CPD may implement. The CIT Report, or similar documentation,
at a minimum, will include:
a. the nature of the incident;
b. the date, time, and location of the incident;
c. the subject’s age, gender, and race/ethnicity;
d. whether the subject is or claims to be a military veteran, if known;
e. the relationship to the subject, if any and if known, of the individual calling
for service;
f. whether the subject has had previous interactions with CPD, if known;
g. the behaviors observed during the incident, including whether the subject used
or displayed a weapon;
h. the name(s) and star (i.e., badge) number(s) of the assigned CPD officer(s)
and whether any of the assigned officers are Certified CIT Officers;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
33
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
i. the name(s) and star (i.e., badge) number(s) of any supervisor responding to
the scene;
j. the skills, techniques, or equipment used by the responding CPD officers;
k. whether a reportable use of force was documented on a Tactical Response
Reports (“TRR”), or whatever similar form of documentation CPD may
implement, for the incident ;
l. a narrative describing the CPD officer’s interaction with the subject, when no
other CPD report captures a narrative account of the incident; and
m. the disposition of the incident.
110. CPD will require that a supervisory member reviews and approves completed CIT
Reports, or any similar form of documentation CPD may implement to document incidents
involving an individual in crisis, before submitting them to the CIT Program.
111. CPD will collect and analyze data regarding the number and types of incidents
involving individuals in crisis and responses of CPD officers to such events to assess staffing and
deployment of Certified CIT Officers and department-wide responses to individuals in crisis.
The CIT Program will review the data contained within the submitted CIT Reports, or any
similar for of documentation CPD may implement, to evaluate the overall response by CPD
officers and identify any district-level and department-wide trends regarding responses to
incidents identified as involving individuals in crisis.
112. CPD will identify and assign a sufficient number of data analysts to collect and
analyze data related to the CIT Program and CPD’s response to incidents involving individuals
in crisis.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
34
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
G. Crisis Intervention Plan
113. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, and on an annual basis thereafter, the City
will publish a written Crisis Intervention Plan. The development of the Crisis Intervention Plan
will be based on the regular review of aggregate data and a sample of incidents conducted by
CPD and OEMC. The CIT Coordinator will consider quantitative crisis-intervention data,
qualitative data on officers’ and community members’ perception of the effectiveness of the CIT
Program, actual incident information, staffing and deployment analysis of available Certified
CIT officers, research reflecting the latest in best practices for police responses to individuals in
crisis, and any feedback and recommendations from the Advisory Committee. OEMC will
consider the response to, identification of, and dispatch of calls for service involving individuals
in crisis by OEMC tele-communicators, research reflecting the latest in best practices for tele-
communicator responses to individuals in crisis, and any feedback and recommendations from
the Advisory Committee.
114. The purpose of the Crisis Intervention Plan will be to evaluate the City’s
identification of and response to incidents involving individuals in crisis and recommend any
changes to staffing and deployment, policy, or training to ensure consistency with CPD and
OEMC policy, this Agreement, and best practices. The Crisis Intervention Plan will:
a. report the number, type, and outcome of incidents involving individuals in
crisis, the number of Certified CIT Officers available and on duty in each
district and on each watch, the percentage of calls for service involving
individuals in crisis for which Certified CIT Officers were the first officers to
respond to the scene for each watch in every district, and the response times
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
35
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
for calls for service involving individuals in crisis for each watch in every
district;
b. evaluate the CIT Program’s compliance with the functions identified above;
c. identify strategies to ensure that CPD has a sufficient number of Certified CIT
Officers to meet its response ratio targets for calls for service involving
individuals in crisis;
d. describe any additional resources, including program staff or equipment, the
CIT Program needs to perform its functions;
e. identify safety issues and trends regarding interactions between individuals in
crisis and officers;
f. identify deficiencies and opportunities for improvement in identifying and
dispatching calls involving individuals in crisis;
g. recognize and highlight CIT Program and Certified CIT Officer successes,
including successful individual officer performance;
h. develop response strategies for repeat calls for service involving individuals
who are frequently in crisis;
i. recommend any changes to crisis intervention-related strategies, policies, and
procedures;
j. recommend any changes to CPD and OEMC trainings related to individuals in
crisis, including any case studies and teaching scenarios; and
k. include a timeline and plan for implementing recommended changes.
115. The data included in the Crisis Intervention Plan will not include any personal
identifying information.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
36
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
116. The CIT Coordinator will have CPD’s portion of the Crisis Intervention Plan
reviewed and approved by the Chief of the Bureau of Patrol within 60 days of the plan’s
completion.
H. Non-CIT Crisis Intervention Training
117. Consistent with the requirements set forth in the Training section of this
Agreement, all officers will receive in-service training, every three years, regarding responding
to individuals in crisis that is adequate in quality, quantity, and scope for officers to demonstrate
competence in the subject matter. This in-service training will include, but not be limited to, the
following topics:
a. a history of the mental health system;
b. how to recognize and respond to individuals in crisis, including, but not
limited to, identifying types of mental health conditions, signs and symptoms
of mental health conditions, common treatments and medications, and
common characteristics, behaviors, or conduct associated with individuals in
crisis;
c. the potential interactions officers may have on a regular basis with individuals
in crisis, their families, and service providers, including steps to ensure
effective communication and avoid escalating a crisis situation;
d. techniques to safely de-escalate a potential crisis situation;
e. the circumstances in which a Certified CIT Officer should be dispatched or
consulted; and
f. local resources that are available to provide treatment, services, or support for
individuals in crisis, and when and how to draw upon those resources.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
37
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
118. All new recruits will receive training that is adequate in quantity, quality, and
scope regarding responding to individuals in crisis. It will include, but not be limited to, training
on the subjects identified above.
I. Advisory Committee
119. The City will have a crisis intervention response advisory committee (“Advisory
Committee”) with subject matter expertise and experience that will assist in identifying problems
and developing solutions and interventions designed to improve outcomes for individuals in
crisis who require City services. The Parties acknowledge that the City has formed the City-wide
Mental Health Steering Committee and that the City may draw upon those resources to satisfy
the requirements of this Agreement.
120. The Advisory Committee, at a minimum, will meet quarterly to review and
recommend improvements to the City’s overall response to individuals in crisis, with
consideration to areas such as coordinated crisis response; data collection and evaluation;
community engagement and awareness; service outreach and prevention; and the CIT Program.
121. The City will request that the Advisory Committee provide guidance on crisis
response-related policies, procedures, and training of City agencies, including CPD and OEMC,
and assist the City in developing and expanding current strategies for responding to individuals
in crisis, including developing community resources, such as pre- and post-arrest diversion
resources and alternative response options.
122. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, the City will request that the Advisory
Committee identify and evaluate in writing any opportunities to develop or enhance crisis
response-related policies, procedures, and training of City agencies, including CPD and OEMC,
and increase community resources and alternative response options, including rapid-access
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
38
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
clinics, drop-off centers, and other pre- and post-arrest diversion efforts. The City will also
request that the Advisory Committee identify and evaluate the steps necessary to develop non-
criminal justice responses to individuals in crisis, including, but not limited to, a behavioral
health unit. In evaluating potential community resources and strategies, the Advisory Committee
will identify challenges and opportunities for improvement, if any, and make recommendations.
The City will address the feedback and recommendations identified by the Advisory Committee,
including identifying recommendations that it will adopt, and the plan for implementation, in the
Crisis Intervention Plan. The City will respond to each of the recommendations made by the
Advisory Committee. The response will include a description of the actions that CPD has taken
or plans to take with respect to the issues raised in the recommendations. If the City declines to
implement a recommendation, it will explain the reason(s) for declining.
123. The Advisory Committee will be chaired by the Mayor’s Office, which will invite
individuals with experience working with individuals in crisis and experts with knowledge in law
enforcement responses to individuals in crisis to serve as members of the Advisory Committee.
At a minimum, the Mayor’s Office will invite individuals from the following groups: first
responders; OEMC; county and city hospitals, health care providers, and mental health
professionals; the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office; the Cook County Public Defender’s
Office; at least one academic research entity; community mental health professionals; advocacy
groups for consumers of mental health services; mental health service providers; homeless
service providers; substance abuse providers; persons with lived experiences of mental illness;
and other similar groups.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
39
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
J. Crisis Intervention Policies
124. CPD policy will provide that a crisis intervention response may be necessary even
in situations where there has been an apparent violation of law.
125. CPD policy will encourage officers to redirect individuals in crisis to the
healthcare system, where feasible and appropriate.
126. CPD will ensure that the language used in policies, procedures, forms, databases,
and trainings to communicate about incidents involving individuals in crisis is appropriate,
respectful, and consistent with industry recognized terminology. CPD will seek input from
community stakeholders, including the Advisory Committee, for recommendations to identify
appropriate and respectful terminology.
127. CPD will develop and implement policies, procedures, and protocols regarding
the collection, maintenance, and use of information related to an individual’s medical and mental
health to facilitate necessary and appropriate communication while adequately protecting an
individual’s confidentiality. To develop these policies, procedures, and protocols, CPD will seek
input from community stakeholders, including the Advisory Committee.
128. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will review and revise its crisis
intervention-related policies as necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. CPD will
consider any recommendations or feedback provided by the Advisory Committee when revising
its policies.
K. Crisis Intervention-Related Call Intake and Dispatch
129. OEMC call-takers will continue to identify calls for service involving an
individual known, suspected, or perceived to be in crisis.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
40
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
130. OEMC police communication dispatchers will continue to prioritize Certified CIT
Officers for dispatch to incidents that involve an individual known, suspected, or perceived to be
in crisis. If a Certified CIT Officer is not available to timely respond, OEMC will continue to
dispatch an available officer to avoid compromising response time. OEMC dispatchers will
dispatch a Certified CIT Officer, when available, if the responding officer requests assistance
from a Certified CIT Officer.
131. CPD will provide OEMC with an updated list of current and active Certified CIT
Officers and their assignment at least every week. At the beginning of each watch, CPD will
continue to identify for OEMC the Certified CIT Officers on duty for each watch and in each
district so that OEMC dispatchers know which Certified CIT Officers to prioritize for dispatch to
incidents involving an individual known, suspected, or perceived to be in crisis.
132. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, OEMC will ensure that all current active
tele-communicators have received mental health and CIT awareness training (“OEMC
Training”). OEMC will provide the OEMC Training to new tele-communicators before tele-
communicators complete their training and begin answering calls independently.
133. The OEMC Training will be at least an eight-hour course taught jointly by
qualified OEMC staff and a mental health clinician or advocate.
134. The OEMC Training will cover, at a minimum, the following topics:
identification of individuals in crisis; telephonic suicide prevention strategies; crisis and stress
management, de-escalation, and scenario-based exercises; interactions with individuals with
mental illness; information that should be gathered and shared with the responding officer or
Certified CIT Officer when the call-taker suspects that the call involves an individual in crisis;
the types of calls that may require the dispatching of a Certified CIT Officer or a coordinated
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
41
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
crisis response of first responders reflective of established policy for intake and dispatch; and the
procedures for dispatching a Certified CIT Officer.
135. Any training on mental health and CIT awareness that has already been provided
to tele-communicators may fulfill the OEMC Training requirement of this Agreement, if the
previously provided training satisfies the criteria for the OEMC Training described in this
Agreement.
136. All tele-communicators will receive at least annual refresher training on mental
health and CIT awareness that is adequate to refresh the tele-communicators’ skills on
identifying, dispatching, and appropriately responding to calls for service that involve
individuals in crisis.
137. OEMC will evaluate all mental health and CIT awareness trainings for tele-
communicators on at least an annual basis to ensure that the trainings meet OEMC needs,
comply with this Agreement, incorporate best practices, and ensure that the training is effective
for personnel and for the individuals in crisis served. OEMC will consider recommendations and
feedback from the CIT Coordinator and the Advisory Committee when conducting its
evaluation.
138. OEMC will develop and implement its portion of the Crisis Intervention Plan.
139. OEMC supervisors, on an ongoing basis, will audit and provide feedback to call-
takers and dispatchers regarding their ability to identify, dispatch, and respond appropriately to
calls for service involving individuals in crisis.
140. The Parties acknowledge that OEMC currently meets regularly with CPD and the
City-wide Mental Health Steering Committee. OEMC will continue to meet regularly with CPD,
in addition to appropriate members of the Advisory Committee, including service providers and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
42
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
advocates, to review and assess data and information regarding the identification of, the dispatch
of, and response to calls for service involving individuals in crisis by OEMC tele-
communicators.
141. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, OEMC will review and revise its intake
and dispatch policies and protocols as necessary to meet the requirements of this Agreement.
OEMC will consider any recommendations or feedback provided by the Advisory Committee
when revising its policies.
142. OEMC will ensure that the language used in policies, procedures, forms,
databases, trainings, and by tele-communicators to communicate about calls involving
individuals in crisis is appropriate, respectful, and consistent with industry-recognized
terminology. OEMC will seek input from the Advisory Committee for recommendations to
identify appropriate and respectful terminology.
V. USE OF FORCE
143. CPD’s use of force policies, as well as its training, supervision, and accountability
systems, must ensure that: CPD officers use force in accordance with federal law, state law, and
the requirements of this Agreement; CPD officers apply de-escalation techniques to prevent or
reduce the need for force whenever safe and feasible; when using force, CPD officers only use
force that is objectively reasonable, necessary, and proportional under the totality of the
circumstances; and any use of unreasonable or unnecessary force is promptly identified and
responded to appropriately.
144. CPD adopted revised use of force policies on October 16, 2017 (“October 2017
Policies”). The October 2017 Policies incorporated multiple best practices that were not reflected
in CPD’s prior use of force policies. Building on these improvements, CPD will maintain the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
43
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
best practices reflected in the October 2017 Policies and make additional improvements to its
policies consistent with the terms of this Agreement.
A. Objectives
145. CPD officers have the authority to use force, but that authority is limited by the
law and Department policy. The provisions of this Agreement seek to facilitate compliance with
the law and Department policy regarding the use of force to reduce the circumstances in which
using force is necessary, and to ensure accountability when CPD officers use force that is not
objectively reasonable, necessary, and proportional under the totality of the circumstances.
146. CPD’s use of force policies and training, supervision, and accountability systems
will be designed, implemented, and maintained so that CPD members:
a. act at all times in a manner consistent with the sanctity of human life;
b. act at all times with a high degree of ethics, professionalism, and respect for
the public;
c. use de-escalation techniques to prevent or reduce the need for force whenever
safe and feasible;
d. use sound tactics to eliminate the need to use force or reduce the amount of
force that is needed;
e. only use force that is objectively reasonable, necessary, and proportional
under the totality of the circumstances;
f. only use force for a lawful purpose and not to punish or retaliate;
g. continually assess the situation and modify the use of force as circumstances
change and in ways that are consistent with officer safety, including stopping
the use of force when it is no longer necessary;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
44
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
h. truthfully and completely report all reportable instances of force used;
i. promptly report any use of force that is excessive or otherwise in violation of
policy;
j. are held accountable, consistent with complaint and disciplinary policies, for
use of force that is not objectively reasonable, necessary, and proportional
under the totality of the circumstances, or that otherwise violates law or
policy; and
k. act in a manner that promotes trust between CPD and the communities it
serves.
147. CPD will collect and analyze information on the use of force by CPD members,
including whether and to what extent CPD members use de-escalation techniques in connection
with use of force incidents. CPD will use this information to assess whether its policies, training,
tactics, and practices meet the goals of this Agreement, reflect best practices, and prevent or
reduce the need to use force.
B. Use of Force Policies
148. CPD’s use of force policies must comply with applicable law and this Agreement,
reflect the objectives described above, and promote trust between CPD and the communities that
it serves.
149. CPD will conduct an annual review of its use of force policies consistent with
accreditation requirements of the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies
(“CALEA”). In addition, every two years, CPD will conduct a comprehensive review of its use
of force policies to assess whether CPD’s use of force policies meet the requirements of this
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
45
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Agreement, incorporate best practices, address observed trends and practices, as necessary, and
reflect developments in applicable law.
150. CPD will establish and maintain clear channels through which community
members can provide input regarding CPD’s use of force policies and propose revisions or
additions to those policies. CPD will regularly review the input received, including during the
biennial review process.
1. General Policy Requirements
151. CPD recently adopted de-escalation as a core principle. CPD officers must use de-
escalation techniques to prevent or reduce the need for force whenever safe and feasible. CPD
officers are required to de-escalate potential and ongoing use of force incidents whenever safe
and feasible through the use of techniques that may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. using time as a tactic by slowing down the pace of an incident;
b. employing tactical positioning and re-positioning to isolate and contain a
subject, to create distance between an officer and a potential threat, or to
utilize barriers or cover;
c. continual communication, including exercising persuasion and advice, and
providing a warning prior to the use of force;
d. requesting assistance from other officers, mental health personnel, or
specialized units, as necessary and appropriate; and
e. where appropriate, use trauma-informed communication techniques, including
acknowledging confusion or mistrust, or using a respectful tone.
152. Consistent with CPD’s commitment to preventing and reducing the need for
force, CPD officers will allow individuals to voluntarily comply with lawful orders whenever
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
46
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
safe and feasible (e.g., allowing individuals the opportunity to submit to arrest before force is
used).
153. CPD officers may only use force for a lawful purpose. CPD officers are
prohibited from using force as punishment or retaliation, such as using force to punish or
retaliate against a person for fleeing, resisting arrest, insulting an officer, or engaging in
protected First Amendment activity (e.g., lawful demonstrations, protected speech, observing or
filming police activity, or criticizing an officer or the officer’s conduct).
154. CPD officers must only use force when it is objectively reasonable, necessary,
and proportional under the totality of the circumstances.
155. CPD officers are prohibited from using deadly force except in circumstances
where there is an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to an officer or another person.
CPD officers are not permitted to use deadly force against a person who is a threat only to
himself or herself or to property. CPD officers may only use deadly force as a last resort.
156. CPD officers are prohibited from using deadly force against fleeing subjects who
do not pose an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to an officer or another person.
157. CPD officers will operate their vehicles in a manner that is consistent with CPD
policy and training and with the foremost regard for the safety of all persons involved. CPD will
periodically include instruction regarding sound vehicle maneuvers in its in-service training
regarding use of force. As appropriate, CPD will provide supplemental training guidance
regarding dangerous vehicle maneuvers that should be avoided.
158. Starting no later than January 1, 2019, CPD will track and analyze the frequency
with which CPD officers engage in foot pursuits of persons attempting to evade arrest or
detention by fleeing on foot, regardless of whether the foot pursuit is associated with a reportable
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
47
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
use of force incident. CPD will track foot pursuits associated with reportable use of force
incidents through TRRs or any similar form of documentation CPD may implement.
159. For foot pursuits associated with reportable use of force incidents, by January 1,
2020, CPD will review all associated foot pursuits at the headquarters level to identify any
tactical, equipment, or training concerns.
160. CPD recently issued a foot pursuit training bulletin. By July 1, 2019, CPD will
develop and issue a supplemental foot pursuit training bulletin that reflects best practices from
foot pursuit policies in other jurisdictions. The supplemental training bulletin will be subject to
review and approval by the Monitor and OAG. The supplemental training bulletin will:
a. identify risks and tactical factors officers should consider prior to initiating
and during the course of a foot pursuit;
b. provide guidance to officers regarding radio communications during a foot
pursuit;
c. instruct officers to avoid, to the extent practical, separating from other officers
in the course of a foot pursuit;
d. provide guidance on circumstances when alternatives to a foot pursuit may be
appropriate; and
e. inform officers that they must follow supervisors’ instructions in the course of
a foot pursuit, including instructions to alter tactics or discontinue the pursuit.
161. CPD will provide scenario-based training regarding foot pursuits and the
supplemental foot pursuit training bulletin during the first annual use of force training required
by this Agreement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
48
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
162. By no later than January 1, 2021, the Monitor will complete an assessment of
CPD data and information to determine whether CPD should adopt a foot pursuit policy. If the
Monitor recommends that CPD should adopt a foot pursuit policy, CPD will adopt a foot pursuit
policy no later than July 1, 2021. Any foot pursuit policy adopted by CPD will be subject to
review and approval by the Monitor and OAG.
163. Following a use of force, once the scene is safe and as soon as practicable, CPD
officers must immediately request appropriate medical aid for injured persons.
164. Before January 1, 2021, CPD will ensure that all CPD officers receive Law
Enforcement Medical and Rescue Training (“LEMART”). The LEMART training provided to
CPD officers will incorporate scenario-based elements. Before January 1, 2021, CPD will equip
all CPD officers engaged in patrol activities who have completed LEMART training with an
individual first aid kit (“IFAK”) (as defined in current CPD policy, U06-02-23).
165. Starting January 1, 2021, in use of force incidents involving CPD officers, CPD
will require CPD officers to provide life-saving aid consistent with their LEMART training to
injured persons as soon as it is safe and feasible to do so until medical professionals arrive on
scene. CPD will replenish IFAKs as necessary to ensure officers have the equipment necessary
to render aid consistent with their LEMART training. Subsequent to January 1, 2021, CPD will
ensure that any officer regularly engaged in patrol activities who has no prior LEMART training
receives LEMART training within one year of beginning his or her regular patrol activities.
166. CPD officers must recognize and act upon the duty to intervene on the subject’s
behalf when another officer is using excessive force.
167. Consistent with CPD policy that force must be objectively reasonable, necessary,
and proportional, CPD officers must generally not use force against a person who is handcuffed
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
49
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
or otherwise restrained absent circumstances such as when the person’s actions must be
immediately stopped to prevent injury or escape or when compelled by other law enforcement
objectives.
168. CPD officers are prohibited from using carotid artery restraints or chokeholds (or
other maneuvers for applying direct pressure on a windpipe or airway, i.e., the front of the neck,
with the intention of reducing the intake of air) unless deadly force is authorized. CPD officers
must not use chokeholds or other maneuvers for intentionally putting pressure on a person’s
airway or carotid artery restraints as take-down techniques.
2. Policies Regarding Specific Weapons
169. CPD’s use of force policies must guide officers on all force techniques,
technologies, and weapons that CPD officers are authorized to use. CPD’s use of force policies
must clearly define and describe each force option and the circumstances under which use of
such force is appropriate to address potential types of resistance.
170. CPD will maintain policies for each of the following weapons, using the
following guidelines.
a. Firearms
171. CPD will continue to require that only officers who are currently certified may be
issued, carry, and use firearms.
172. CPD will require officers to consider their surroundings before discharging their
firearms and take reasonable precautions to ensure that people other than the target will not be
struck.
173. CPD will require officers to issue a verbal warning prior to the use of any
reportable force, including the use of firearms, when it is safe and feasible to do so.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
50
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
174. When CPD officers discharge firearms, they must continually assess the
circumstances that necessitated the discharge and modify their use of force accordingly,
including ceasing to use their firearm when the circumstances no longer require it (e.g., when a
subject is no longer a threat).
175. CPD will continue to prohibit officers from firing warning shots.
176. CPD officers must not fire at moving vehicles when the vehicle is the only force
used against the officer or another person, except in extreme circumstances when it is a last
resort to preserve human life or prevent great bodily harm to a person, such as when a vehicle is
intentionally being used to attack a person or group of people. CPD will continue to instruct
officers to avoid positioning themselves or remaining in the path of a moving vehicle, and will
provide officers with adequate training to ensure compliance with this instruction.
177. CPD will prohibit officers from firing from a moving vehicle unless such force is
necessary to protect against an imminent threat to life or to prevent great bodily harm to the
officer or another person.
b. Electronic Control Weapons (“Tasers”)
178. CPD will continue to require that only officers who are currently certified may be
issued, carry, and use Tasers.
179. CPD will instruct officers that Tasers can cause serious injury or death and, as a
result, officers should use Tasers only after balancing relevant factors including the threat
presented by the subject, the risk of injury if a Taser is used, and the seriousness of the suspected
offense. Consistent with this standard, CPD officers should not use Tasers against persons who
are reasonably perceived to be non-violent, unarmed, and suspected of low-level offenses, such
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
51
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
as property-related misdemeanors, quality of life offenses, moving or traffic violations, or
municipal code violations.
180. CPD will clarify in policy that flight alone, without any other basis for reasonable
articulable suspicion or probable cause, does not justify use of a Taser against a subject.
181. When safe and feasible to do so, CPD officers must give verbal commands and
warnings prior to, during, and after deployment of a Taser. When safe and feasible to do so, CPD
officers will allow a subject a reasonable amount of time to comply with a warning prior to using
or continuing to use a Taser, unless doing so would compromise the safety of an officer or
another person.
182. CPD will strongly discourage the use of Tasers in schools and on students. CPD
will require officers to consider the totality of the circumstances, including a subject’s apparent
age, size, and the threat presented, in assessing the reasonableness and necessity of using a Taser
in a school.
183. CPD officers will treat each application or standard cycle (five seconds) of a
Taser as a separate use of force that officers must separately justify as objectively reasonable,
necessary, and proportional. CPD will continue to require officers to, when possible, use only
one five-second energy cycle and reassess the situation before any additional cycles are given or
cartridges are discharged. In determining whether any additional application is necessary, CPD
officers will consider whether the individual has the ability and has been given a reasonable
opportunity to comply prior to applying another cycle.
184. CPD will require that if the subject has been exposed to three, five-second energy
cycles (or has been exposed to a cumulative 15 total seconds of energy) and the officer has not
gained control, officers switch to other force options unless the officer can reasonably justify that
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
52
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
continued Taser use was necessary to ensure the safety of the officer or another person,
recognizing that prolonged Taser exposure may increase the risk of death or serious injury.
185. CPD officers must:
a. determine the necessity, objective reasonableness, and proportionality of
Taser use based on the totality of the circumstances, including the subject’s
apparent age, size, physical and mental condition, disability, and impairment;
b. not use Tasers in drive-stun mode unless the subject is an assailant and other
force options are not readily available or would otherwise be ineffective;
c. when practicable, avoid the use of Tasers when it is reasonably evident that a
deployment may cause serious physical injury, including if the subject is
elevated above the ground, if the subject is operating or riding any mode of
transportation, or if the subject may be less able to catch or protect themselves
in a fall;
d. not use Tasers in any environment that contains potentially flammable,
volatile, or explosive material;
e. not use Tasers on a subject who is at a greater risk of serious injury or death
from Taser use, including, but not limited to, children, pregnant women, and
the elderly, unless the subject is an assailant and other force options are not
readily available or would otherwise be ineffective;
f. target the Taser in probe mode at the lower center mass and avoid the head,
neck, and genitalia;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
53
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
g. not activate more than one Taser at a time against a subject, unless an officer
already attempted to use a Taser against the subject but the probes did not
make contact with the subject; and
h. keep Tasers in a weak-side holster.
186. CPD officers must request medical aid for a person subjected to a Taser
application. CPD officers must place any person subjected to a Taser application in a position
that does not impair respiration, as soon as it is safe and feasible to do so. CPD officers must
render life-saving aid to injured persons consistent with their training until medical professionals
arrive on scene. Only trained medical personnel may remove Taser probes from a subject.
187. CPD will conduct Taser inspections on a periodic basis to perform information
downloads, ensure Tasers are operable, and perform necessary maintenance or repairs.
c. Oleoresin Capsicum Devices (“OC Devices”)
188. CPD officers may use OC devices only when such force is objectively reasonable,
necessary, and proportional under the totality of the circumstances, and consistent with the
objectives above.
189. CPD officers may only use OC devices for crowd dispersal when such force is
necessary, objectively reasonable, and proportional to the threat presented to public safety. CPD
will continue to require that the Superintendent or his or her designee provides authorization
before OC devices are used for noncompliant groups, crowds, or an individual taking part in a
group or crowd.
190. When safe and feasible to do so, CPD officers must issue verbal commands and
warnings to the subject prior to, during, and after the discharge of an OC device. When safe and
feasible to do so, CPD will require officers to allow a subject a reasonable amount of time to
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
54
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
comply with a warning prior to using or continuing to use an OC device, unless doing so would
compromise the safety of an officer or another person.
191. Each individual application of an OC device (e.g., each spray of an officer’s
personal OC device) by a CPD officer must be objectively reasonable, necessary, and
proportional under the totality of the circumstances, and consistent with the objectives above.
192. CPD officers must assist subjects exposed to application of an OC device with
decontamination and flushing when it is safe and feasible to do so. CPD officers must request the
appropriate medical aid for a subject after the discharge of an OC device if the subject appears to
be in any physical distress, or complains of injury or aggravation of a pre-existing medical
condition (e.g., asthma, emphysema, bronchitis, or a heart ailment).
193. CPD officers may only use department-issued or approved OC devices.
d. Impact Weapons
194. CPD officers must not use impact weapons (e.g., baton, asp, improvised impact
weapons) to intentionally strike a subject in the head or neck, except when deadly force is
justified.
195. When safe and feasible to do so, CPD officers must give verbal commands and
warnings prior to, during, and after using an impact weapon.
196. CPD officers must receive training on proper use of an impact weapon before
being permitted to carry such weapon.
197. CPD officers must request appropriate medical aid for a subject who experiences
an impact weapon strike when the subject appears to be in any physical distress or complains of
injury, or when the subject sustained a strike to the head from an impact weapon or a hard, fixed
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
55
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
object. CPD officers must render life-saving aid to the subject consistent with the officers’
training until medical professionals arrive on scene.
C. Reporting Uses of Force
198. To be effective, the foundation of CPD’s accountability system must be CPD
members. When CPD members use force, they must be able to demonstrate that the force used
complies with the law and CPD policy. When a member’s use of force does not comply with the
law and CPD policy, the member’s supervisors must be able to identify the non-compliance and
take appropriate action to address it. To facilitate evaluation of how CPD members use force,
CPD will ensure that members report incidents when they use force and that supervisors collect
and review available information about the incidents.
199. CPD members must report and document any reportable use of force. Beginning
January 1, 2019, a reportable use of force will be defined as any use of force by a CPD member
included in any of the following three levels:
a. A level 1 reportable use of force is the use of any force by a CPD member to
overcome the active resistance of a subject that does not rise to a level 2 or
level 3 reportable use of force. This would include force that is reasonably
expected to cause pain or an injury, but does not result in injury or complaint
of injury. The following techniques are level 1 reportable uses of force when
applied in response to active resistance: pressure point compliance techniques;
joint manipulation techniques; wristlocks; armbars; and any leg sweep,
weaponless defense techniques, or takedown that does not result in injury or
complaint of injury. It is not a reportable use of force for a CPD member to
escort, touch, or handcuff a person with no or minimal resistance.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
56
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
b. A level 2 reportable use of force is the use of any force by a CPD member that
includes use of a less-lethal weapon or that causes an injury or results in a
complaint of an injury, but that does not rise to a level 3 reportable use of
force. Force options in this level include: discharge of an OC device;
discharge of a Taser; impact weapon strikes to any part of the body other than
the head or neck; use of impact munitions; any physical apprehension by a
canine; any reportable use of force against a handcuffed subject; and any leg
sweep, weaponless defense technique, or takedown resulting in an injury or
complaint of injury.
c. A level 3 reportable use of force is when a CPD member does any of the
following: uses any force that constitutes deadly force, such as discharging a
firearm or using an impact weapon to strike a person’s head or neck; uses a
chokehold or other maneuver for intentionally putting pressure on a person’s
airway or carotid artery; uses any force that causes the death of any person; or
uses any force that causes injury to any person resulting in admission to a
hospital.
200. Whenever a CPD member engages in a reportable use of force, the member must
complete a TRR, or any similar form of documentation CPD may implement, prior to the end of
his or her tour of duty. In addition to completing the TRR, officers must also document the
reason for the initial stop, arrest, or other enforcement action per CPD policy. CPD may allow
members requiring medical attention a reasonable amount of additional time to complete the
required documentation. CPD may allow supervisors to complete the TRR for members who are
unable to complete the report due to injury or in other extraordinary circumstances.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
57
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
201. In completing the TRR, or whatever similar documentation CPD may implement,
CPD members must include a narrative that describes with specificity the use of force incident,
the subject’s actions, or other circumstances necessitating the level of force used; and the
involved member's response, including de-escalation efforts attempted and the specific types and
amounts of force used. The narrative requirement does not apply to CPD members who
discharged a firearm in the performance of duty or participated in an officer-involved death in
the performance of duty. Any CPD member who observes or is present when another CPD
member discharges a firearm or uses other deadly force must complete a written witness
statement prior to the end of his or her tour of duty. CPD members will note in their TRRs the
existence of any body-worn camera or in-car camera audio or video footage, and whether any
such footage was viewed in advance of completing the TRR or any other incident reports. CPD
members must complete TRRs, or whatever similar documentation CPD may implement, and
other reports related to the incident, truthfully and thoroughly.
202. Any CPD member who engages in a reportable use of force must immediately
report the incident to OEMC. OEMC is required to notify the involved member’s immediate
supervisor and the Watch Operations Lieutenant of the district of occurrence.
203. A CPD supervisor will immediately respond to the scene when a level 2 or level 3
reportable use of force occurs (“responding supervisor”). CPD supervisors may, at their
discretion, respond to the scene when a level 1 reportable use of force occurs, but they are not
required to do so.
204. For level 2 and level 3 reportable use of force incidents, the duties of the
responding supervisor will include, at a minimum:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
58
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. identifying known available witnesses to the use of force to the extent
reasonably possible and documenting their identities and statements in a
written report, except in incidents for which the Civilian Office of Police
Accountability (“COPA”) receives administrative notifications and responds
to the scene;
b. coordinating with COPA, as appropriate;
c. gathering and preserving evidence related to the use of force;
d. requesting the assignment of an evidence technician to photograph persons
involved in the incident, including any injuries sustained;
e. ensuring that members and subjects receive appropriate medical care;
f. making notifications as required by CPD policy; and
g. reviewing reports regarding the incident for legibility and completeness.
205. In addition, for level 2 and level 3 reportable use of force incidents involving an
injury or complaint of injury for which COPA does not have jurisdiction, the responding
supervisor will undertake reasonable efforts to identify and interview additional witnesses
beyond those that are known and available.
206. A supervisor who used force or ordered force to be used during a reportable use
of force incident will not perform the duties assigned to the responding supervisor for that
incident.
207. CPD will continue to require the responding supervisor to document information
collected and actions taken in performing his or her investigatory duties in the supervisor’s
portion of the TRR, or in any other similar form of documentation CPD may implement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
59
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
208. Any CPD member who becomes aware of information indicating that a reportable
use of force occurred but was not reported must immediately notify his or her supervisor.
D. Supervisory Review of Reportable Uses of Force
209. Supervisors play a critical role in ensuring that force is used legally, consistent
with CPD policy, and in a manner that will promote community confidence in the Department.
Supervisor reviews and investigations of uses of force are essential to identify necessary
individual and departmental corrective action.
210. All reportable uses of force by CPD members must be reviewed by CPD
supervisors.
211. After a reportable use of force has occurred, required TRRs have been completed,
and, in the case of level 2 and level 3 incidents, a responding supervisor has documented any
investigatory information collected, the incident will be reviewed and evaluated by a CPD
supervisor at least the rank of Lieutenant, and in all instances at least one rank level above that of
the highest-ranking member who engaged in the reportable use of force, or by a command staff
member, when designated (“reviewing supervisor”).
212. The reviewing supervisor will conduct an investigation into the reportable use of
force incident by reviewing all information reasonably available regarding the incident, including
written reports, video or audio recordings, and, in the case of level 2 and level 3 reportable use of
force incidents, witness statements, photographs (if available), and other evidence or information
collected by the responding supervisor. After advising the subject of his or her right not to
answer questions and other applicable rights, and only if the subject voluntarily consents to an
interview, the reviewing supervisor will interview the subject solely about the reportable use of
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
60
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
force. In addition, the reviewing supervisor will visually inspect the subject and document any
injuries observed.
213. For all reportable uses of force, the reviewing supervisor will determine, based on
the information reviewed, if the use of force requires a notification to COPA and will assess
whether the use of force was in compliance with CPD policy (except for incidents involving
deadly force or an officer-involved death). The reviewing supervisor will also review the TRR,
or any similar form of documentation CPD may implement, for sufficiency and completeness.
214. For all reportable use of force incidents, the reviewing supervisor will: provide
timely, constructive feedback, where appropriate, to the officer who engaged in the reportable
use of force, the officer’s supervisor, or both; recommend additional training and/or support as
necessary based on the incident; take appropriate action, including referring uses of force that
may violate law or CPD policy to COPA.
215. CPD will continue to require the reviewing supervisor to document in a Tactical
Response Report – Investigation (“TRR-I”), or in any other similar form of documentation CPD
may implement, his or her detailed assessment of compliance with CPD policy, any constructive
feedback, and any required or recommended action. In addition, the reviewing supervisor will
include in the TRR-I or in any other similar form of documentation CPD may implement, the
identities of CPD members on scene during the incident who are reasonably believed to have
relevant knowledge or information regarding the reportable use of force.
216. All district-level supervisory review documentation regarding a reportable use of
force incident must be completed within 48 hours of the incident, unless an extension is
approved by a command staff member.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
61
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
E. Body-Worn Cameras
217. CPD will continue to develop, implement, and maintain a system of video
recording officers’ encounters with the public with body-worn cameras. The use of body-worn
cameras will be designed to increase officer accountability, improve trust and CPD legitimacy in
the community, and augment CPD’s records of law enforcement-related activities.
218. CPD will continue to require all officers assigned to patrol field duties to wear
body-worn cameras and microphones with which to record law-enforcement related activities as
outlined in the Illinois Law Enforcement Officer-Worn Body Camera Act (50 ILCS 706/10-1 et
seq.), with limited exceptions, including, but not limited to, when requested by a victim or
witness of a crime, or interacting with a confidential informant. CPD will develop and implement
a written policy delineating the circumstances when officers will not be equipped with body-
worn cameras.
219. CPD will continue to maintain a policy regarding body-worn camera video and
audio recording that will require officers to record their law-enforcement related activities, and
that will ensure the recordings are retained in compliance with the Department’s Forms
Retention Schedule (CPD-11.717) and the Illinois Law Enforcement Officer-Worn Body Camera
Act. At a minimum, CPD’s body-worn camera policy will:
a. clearly state which officers are required to use body-worn cameras and under
which circumstances;
b. require officers, subject to limited exceptions specified in writing, to activate
their cameras when responding to calls for service and during all law
enforcement-related activities that occur while on duty, and to continue
recording until the conclusion of the incident(s);
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
62
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. require officers to articulate in writing or on camera their reason(s) for failing
to record an activity that CPD policy otherwise requires to be recorded;
d. require officers to inform subjects that they are being recorded unless doing so
would be unsafe, impractical, or impossible;
e. address relevant privacy considerations, including restrictions on recording
inside a home, and the need to protect witnesses, victims, and children;
f. establish a download and retention protocol;
g. require periodic random review of officers’ videos for compliance with CPD
policy and training purposes;
h. require that the reviewing supervisor review videos of incidents involving
reportable uses of force by a subordinate; and
i. specify that officers who knowingly fail to comply with the policy may be
subject to progressive discipline, training, or other remedial action.
220. CPD officers must comply with the body-worn camera policy. CPD will impose
progressive discipline, training, or other remedial action on officers who do not comply with the
body-worn camera policy, as permitted by applicable law.
221. Any CPD officer required to wear a body-worn camera must:
a. visually and physically inspect the body-worn camera and ensure that it is the
member’s assigned camera, fully charged, and operational at the beginning of
each tour of duty; and
b. immediately notify a supervisor if, at any time, the member’s assigned body-
worn camera becomes inoperable (including when either or both of the audio
or video recording functions is inoperable) or is damaged.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
63
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
222. CPD will ensure that any CPD officer who reports an inoperable or damaged
body-worn camera is promptly provided with a temporary or replacement body-worn camera,
which will in no event be later than the beginning of the member’s next tour of duty.
223. CPD will ensure that CPD officers assigned to Department vehicles that are
equipped with in-car cameras check that the cameras are fully functional at the beginning of each
watch and make appropriate notifications when they are not. CPD will ensure that any non-
functioning or malfunctioning in-car camera is repaired or replaced within two weeks of a CPD
officer reporting that the in-car camera is not functioning properly.
F. Use of Force Training
224. CPD’s pre-service and in-service training must provide officers with knowledge
of policies and laws regulating the use of force; equip officers with tactics and skills, including
de-escalation techniques, to prevent or reduce the need to use force or, when force must be used,
to use force that is objectively reasonable, necessary, and proportional under the totality of the
circumstances; and ensure appropriate supervision and accountability.
225. CPD’s training regarding the use of firearms, Tasers, OC devices, impact
weapons, and other force options that CPD currently authorizes or may authorize in the future
will be consistent with its commitment to de-escalation as a core principle. Any initial training,
qualification, or requalification regarding these force options will incorporate scenario-based
elements, including scenarios in which officers achieve resolution without employing force.
CPD’s training regarding these force options will also provide specific guidance to officers
regarding required procedures and techniques after each of these force options are used,
including procedures and techniques for limiting a subject’s injuries.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
64
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
226. CPD will provide all current CPD officers with in-service use of force training on
at least an annual basis, and more frequently when necessitated by developments in applicable
law and CPD policy. CPD will coordinate and review all use of force training to ensure quality,
consistency, and compliance with federal and state law, CPD policy, and this Agreement.
227. The annual use of force training will include the following topics:
a. CPD policies and Fourth Amendment law governing the use of force;
b. proper use of force decision-making that utilizes a critical thinking framework
in which officers gather relevant facts; assess the situation, threats, and risks;
consider CPD policy; identify options and determine the best course of action;
and act, review, and reassess the situation;
c. role-playing scenarios and interactive exercises that illustrate proper use of
force decision-making;
d. ethical decision-making and peer intervention, principles of procedural justice,
the role of implicit bias, and strategies for interacting with individuals in
crisis;
e. de-escalation techniques and tactics to prevent or reduce the need for force,
including exercising persuasion and advice, and providing a warning;
stabilizing the situation through the use of time, distance, or positioning to
isolate and contain a subject; and requesting additional personnel to respond
or make use of specialized units or equipment; the proper deployment of
CPD-issued or -approved weapons or technologies, including firearms and
Tasers;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
65
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
f. use of force reporting, investigation, and review requirements, including
documenting reportable use of force incidents; and
g. other topics as determined based on the training needs assessment required by
this Agreement.
228. CPD will also provide initial training on all of the topics identified above, as well
as others, to all recruits as part of its recruit training curriculum.
229. Supervisors of all ranks, as part of their initial pre-service promotional training
and other identified supervisory training, will receive training on the following:
a. conducting use of force reviews or investigations appropriate to their rank;
b. strategies for effectively directing officers in de-escalation principles and
acting to intervene on the subject’s behalf when any use of force is observed
that is excessive or otherwise in violation of policy; and
c. supporting officers who report objectively unreasonable or unreported force,
or who are retaliated against for attempting to prevent objectively
unreasonable force.
VI. RECRUITMENT, HIRING, AND PROMOTION
A. Guiding Principles
230. Having a department that recruits, hires, and promotes officers who are qualified
to meet the increasingly complex needs of law enforcement and that reflects a broad cross
section of the Chicago community in which it serves is critical to accomplishing the following
goals: running a professional police force; building community trust and confidence; increasing
legitimacy and acceptance of CPD’s supervision and accountability systems; and reducing
perceptions of bias.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
66
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
231. The provisions of this Agreement are designed to ensure that CPD attracts, hires,
retains, and promotes individuals who are equipped to perform their jobs safely, effectively, and
in accordance with the law, CPD policy, and the terms of this Agreement. Further, this
Agreement is designed to ensure that CPD promotes individuals who are capable of: providing
effective supervision; guiding officers under their command on lawful, safe, and effective
policing; and holding officers accountable for misconduct.
232. The City and CPD’s recruitment, hiring, and promotions policies and practices
will show a commitment to attracting, hiring, and promoting qualified candidates at all ranks that
reflect a broad cross section of the Chicago community the Department serves.
233. The Parties acknowledge that the City and CPD are currently subject to the City
of Chicago Police Department Hiring Plan for Sworn Titles (“Hiring Plan”), dated May 14,
2014, which may be subject to change in the future.
B. Policies and Practices
234. The City and CPD will ensure that its recruitment, hiring, and promotion policies
and practices are lawful, fair, and consistent with best practices, anti-discrimination laws, and the
terms of this Agreement.
235. CPD will provide clear guidance on its policies and procedures for recruiting,
hiring, and promoting police officers and will clearly allocate responsibilities for recruitment,
hiring, and promotion efforts.
236. To further this goal, the City and CPD will publish job descriptions for each
sworn member title code, specifying the current duties, responsibilities, and minimum
qualifications for each position.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
67
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
237. The City and CPD will continue to review any hiring and promotional exams to
ensure they are fair, validated, and properly administered.
238. CPD will inform officers of the role of the Office of the Inspector General
(“OIG”) in overseeing the hiring and promotions processes.
C. Recruitment and Hiring
239. By December 31, 2020, and at least every three years thereafter, CPD will assess
its recruitment and hiring processes to ensure that its policies and practices comply with the law,
are transparent, and are consistent with this Agreement.
240. The recruitment and hiring assessment will identify and consider:
a. the core set of characteristics and capabilities of qualified recruits;
b. methods for consideration of discriminatory or biased behavior by the
applicant against a member of a protected class in hiring decisions;
c. barriers and challenges to successfully completing the recruit application
process;
d. Department strategies for attracting and hiring qualified applicants that reflect
a broad cross section of the Chicago community;
e. input, which could consider surveys, from successful and unsuccessful
applicants, recruits and other CPD members, community members,
community-based organizations, legal and law enforcement professionals, and
internal and external subject matter experts regarding the strengths and
weaknesses of the recruitment and hiring processes;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
68
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
f. recommendations for any modifications to the current recruitment and hiring
processes that would enable CPD to satisfy the requirements of this section;
and
g. a plan for implementing any recommended modifications with a timeline for
implementation.
D. Sergeant and Lieutenant Promotions
241. Within 18 months of the Effective Date, and at least every three years thereafter,
CPD will obtain an independent expert assessment of its promotions processes for the ranks of
Sergeant and Lieutenant to ensure that its policies and practices comply with the law, are
transparent, and are consistent with this Agreement. The independent expert will review the
existing Hiring Plan, and any relevant collective bargaining agreements in order to conduct the
assessment of the Sergeant and Lieutenant promotions processes. The Sergeant and Lieutenant
promotions assessment, at a minimum, will identify:
a. the processes by which CPD selects candidates for promotion to Sergeant and
Lieutenant who possess a core set of competencies, characteristics, and
capabilities and, when applicable, who are effective supervisors in compliance
with CPD policy and this Agreement;
b. methods for consideration of each candidate’s disciplinary history in the
selection process;
c. Department strategies for promoting qualified applicants who reflect a broad
cross section of the Chicago community;
d. the frequency with which CPD should hold promotional exams;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
69
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
e. opportunities to increase transparency and officer awareness about the
promotions process and promotions decisions, including, but not limited to,
identifying criteria for promotions; and
f. recommendations for any modifications to the current promotions processes,
which would enable CPD to address the requirements of this section.
242. Within 60 days of the completion of the independent expert’s promotions
assessment, CPD will develop an implementation plan to respond to any recommendations
identified in the assessment, including any recommended modifications to the promotions
processes and a timeline for implementation. Upon completion, CPD will share the results of the
assessment and its implementation plan with the Monitor for review and approval. Within 60
days of receiving the Monitor’s approval, CPD will begin to implement the plan.
E. Captain and Commander Promotions
243. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, CPD will identify and publish, both
internally and externally, for the ranks of Captain and Commander, the duties, eligibility criteria,
knowledge, skills, and abilities considered to select qualified candidates who are effective
supervisors in compliance with CPD policy and this Agreement.
244. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop strategies to increase
transparency and awareness about the promotions process for the ranks of Captain and
Commander, including, but not limited to, criteria for promotions and promotion decisions.
VII. TRAINING
A. Guiding Principles
245. CPD will enhance its recruit training, field training, in-service training, and pre-
service promotional training so that they are sufficient in duration and scope to prepare officers
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
70
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
to comply with CPD directives consistently, effectively, and in accordance with the law, CPD
policy, best practices, and this Agreement.
246. CPD training will reflect its commitment to procedural justice, de-escalation,
impartial policing, and community policing.
247. CPD training will convey CPD’s expectations that officers perform their jobs
diligently and safely, and have an understanding of, and commitment to, the constitutional rights
of the individuals they encounter.
248. The training required under this Agreement is set out in this section and, for
specific topic areas, in the Community Policing, Impartial Policing, Crisis Intervention, Use of
Force, Officer Wellness and Support, and Accountability and Transparency sections.
B. Training Plan
249. The Parties acknowledge that in late 2016, CPD established the Training
Oversight Committee (“TOC”), which is responsible for overseeing the Department’s training
program.
250. The TOC, or other similarly-structured oversight entity, will continue to review
and oversee the Department’s training program and will be chaired by the First Deputy
Superintendent, or other high-ranking member of CPD’s command staff. The TOC will also
include, in some capacity, personnel from various units of the Department that are responsible
for overseeing patrol field operations; administering training; providing legal advice;
coordinating and exercising supervision over disciplinary matters; managing data, technology,
and information systems; overseeing and coordinating the community relations strategy; and
reviewing reportable use of force incidents. It will meet at least once a month and continue to
record meeting minutes.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
71
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
251. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, and on an annual basis thereafter, CPD’s
Education and Training Division will, under the supervision of the TOC, conduct a needs
assessment, which will, among other things identify and consider:
a. information collected from use of force reviews, discipline and civilian
complaints, and reports of officer safety issues;
b. input from CPD members of all ranks and their respective collective
bargaining units, if applicable;
c. input from members of the community;
d. recommendations from CPD oversight entities, including, but not limited to
COPA, the Deputy Inspector General for Public Safety (“Deputy PSIG”), and
the Police Board;
e. changes in the law, to the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards
Board requirements, and to CPD policy, if any;
f. court decisions and litigation;
g. research reflecting the latest in training and law enforcement best practices;
h. information obtained from evaluation of training courses, instructors, and
FTOs; and
i. member reaction to, and satisfaction with, the training they received.
252. Within one year of the Effective Date, and on an annual basis thereafter, the
Education and Training Division will develop—and the TOC will review and approve—a written
Training Plan for CPD’s recruit, field, in-service, and pre-service promotional training to ensure
that CPD members are trained to safely, effectively, and lawfully carry out their duties in
accordance with the law, CPD policy, best practices, and this Agreement. The Training Plan will:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
72
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. identify training priorities, principles, and broad goals consistent with this
Agreement;
b. prioritize the needs identified during the needs assessment and identify those
needs that will be addressed by the plan;
c. include a plan and schedule for delivering all CPD training as necessary to
fulfill the requirements and goals of this Agreement;
d. identify subject areas for CPD training;
e. determine the mandatory and elective courses, consistent with this Agreement,
to be provided as part of the In-Service Training Program;
f. develop a plan to inform officers about the In-Service Training Program, its
course offerings, and its requirements;
g. determine which aspects of the In-Service Training Program can be delivered
in a decentralized manner, including e-learning, and which training requires
more intensive, centralized delivery, to ensure effective delivery and
comprehension of the material;
h. address any needed modification of the Field Training and Evaluation
Program to fulfill the requirements and goals of this Agreement;
i. identify necessary training resources including, but not limited to, instructors,
curricula, equipment, and training facilities;
j. determine the content, consistent with this Agreement, to be provided as part
of pre-service promotional training for Sergeants, Lieutenants, Captains, and
command staff;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
73
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
k. develop a plan to implement and utilize a centralized electronic system for
scheduling and tracking all CPD training;
l. develop a plan to implement and utilize a system for assessing the content and
delivery of all CPD training, including training provided by outside instructors
or non-CPD entities; and
m. identify community-based organizations that represent a broad cross section
of the city to participate, as feasible, practical, and appropriate, in the
development and delivery of the curriculum regarding subjects including, but
not limited to, procedural justice, de-escalation, impartial policing, and
community policing, and make efforts to encourage such participation by such
organizations.
C. Training Development and Delivery
253. With oversight from the TOC, CPD will develop and implement recruit, field, in-
service, and pre-service promotional training curricula and lesson plans that comport with CPD’s
Training Plan and that address the requirements and goals of this Agreement.
254. Under the supervision of the TOC, CPD’s Education and Training Division,
pursuant to the Training Plan, will develop and approve training curricula, lesson plans, and
course materials that are (a) consistent across subjects; (b) of sufficient quality to adequately
communicate the intended subject matter to CPD members; and (c) in accordance with the law,
CPD policy, best practices, and this Agreement.
255. The TOC will oversee the integration of the concepts of procedural justice, de-
escalation, impartial policing, and community policing into CPD training, including, but not
limited to use of force, weapons training, and Fourth Amendment subjects, as appropriate.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
74
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
256. The TOC will oversee continued development and integration of instructional
strategies that incorporate active learning methods such as problem-solving, scenario-based
activities, and adult learning techniques—in addition to traditional lecture formats—into training
delivery.
257. Where it would add to the quality or effectiveness of the training program, the
Education and Training Division will seek the assistance of outside expertise, as feasible,
practical, and appropriate, either in developing or reviewing CPD curricula and lesson plans, or
reviewing pilot versions of CPD courses.
258. The TOC will continue to oversee a process that effectively incorporates material
changes in relevant case law, statutes, and CPD policy into recruit, field, in-service, and pre-
service promotional training in a timely and effective manner.
259. All training materials disseminated to CPD members and displayed at CPD
facilities will reflect current CPD policy.
260. CPD will develop, implement, and utilize a centralized electronic system for
scheduling and tracking all CPD training to allow the Education and Training Division to
effectively plan and manage training schedules and instructor assignments for all training.
261. The City will be responsible for providing appropriate training facilities that offer
adequate access to safe and effective training.
D. Instructor Selection and Development
262. All CPD training instructors must be appropriately qualified for their instructional
roles and use only approved curricula and lesson plans. CPD will actively recruit and retain
qualified instructors to ensure that CPD has sufficient qualified instructors to meet the needs of
the Department and requirements of the Training Plan.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
75
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
263. As appropriate to accomplish the requirements and goals of this Agreement, CPD
will incorporate experts and guest speakers to participate in the development and instruction of
relevant courses, as feasible, practical, and appropriate, including, but not limited to:
a. CPD members of all ranks;
b. members of the community;
c. legal and law enforcement professionals, such as judges, prosecutors, public
defenders;
d. crime victims; and
e. subject matter experts.
264. CPD will require that all new and current Education and Training Division
instructors and curriculum developers are certified by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and
Standards Board and, as appropriate to their roles, receive initial and annual refresher training on
subjects including, but not limited to, effective teaching, adult-learning techniques, and
curriculum development. CPD will further require that instructors are trained in the specific
subject matter they are assigned to teach and are also cross-trained in other related subjects so
that they are equipped to deliver effective interdisciplinary instruction. Instructor training will
also include peer review.
265. The Education and Training Division will conduct annual instructor performance
reviews. Performance reviews will include classroom observations, member feedback, and in-
person meetings with instructors to discuss performance and areas of improvement. These
performance reviews will be considered in assessing whether instructors may continue to serve
in that role.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
76
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
E. Training Evaluation
266. The review and analysis of the content and delivery of training will enable CPD to
determine whether the training provided to members effectively prepares them to police fairly,
safely, and in accordance with the law, CPD policy, best practices, and this Agreement.
267. Pursuant to its Training Plan, CPD will develop and implement a process that
provides for the collection, analysis, and review of course and instructor evaluations to document
the effectiveness of existing training and to improve the quality of future instruction and
curriculum. This process will include member feedback on the training they have received and
analysis of the extent to which such training is reflected in how members perform. The
Education and Training Division will consider this information in conducting its annual needs
assessment.
268. The Education and Training Division will develop and implement a process to
maintain audits, reviews, assessments, or evaluations of the sufficiency or effectiveness of the
training programs.
269. CPD will develop and implement testing policies and procedures to ensure that
any member testing that is administered is reliable and fair. To achieve this purpose, both
knowledge-based and performance-based tests will be designed, developed, administered, and
scored according to best practices. All tests will assess the knowledge and skills required for
successful job performance and will align with the materials delivered in training.
F. Training Records
270. CPD will develop, implement, and utilize a centralized electronic file system for
assessing the content and delivery of all CPD training, including training provided by outside
instructors or non-CPD entities. This system will allow the Education and Training Division to
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
77
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
electronically track and maintain complete and accurate records of all training provided to CPD
members, including curricula, lesson plans, training delivered, member feedback, assessments,
and other training materials. This system will, at a minimum:
a. maintain training records for each member of the Department;
b. record the course description, duration, curriculum, date, location, and the
members who completed the training; and
c. identify members who did not complete required training and describe
remedial training actions that were taken.
271. The Education and Training Division will document all training provided to or
received by CPD members, whether required or not. Members will sign an acknowledgement of
attendance or digitally acknowledge completion of training.
272. The Education and Training Division will, on an annual basis, report on training
to the TOC and the Superintendent. At a minimum, this report will:
a. contain a description of each course, including a summary of the subject
matter;
b. state the duration, date, location, and number of persons by rank who
completed the training;
c. identify whether the training was part of the recruit, in-service, or pre-service
promotional training program;
d. state whether the training was centralized or decentralized, and delivered in
person or through electronic means;
e. list whether the training was mandatory, elective, or remedial; and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
78
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
f. document the members who did not complete required training and any
remedial training actions taken.
G. Recruit Training
273. A solid foundation of recruit training is important for equipping new police
officers with the skills, knowledge, and values to police fairly, safely, effectively, and in
accordance with the law, CPD policy, best practices, and this Agreement.
274. CPD will ensure that upon graduation from the Academy, recruits demonstrate a
firm grasp of the basic technical and tactical skills, critical thinking, problem-solving, and
interpersonal skills that form the basis for safe and effective policing. In order to do so, CPD will
rely on appropriate evaluation tools to measure recruits’ skills and qualifications.
275. The Parties acknowledge that CPD, through its Recruit Curriculum Working
Group, revised and updated the content and delivery of its recruit training curriculum in 2017.
CPD will further modify the amount, content, and delivery of its recruit training to comport with
its Training Plan and the requirements and goals of this Agreement.
276. CPD will ensure that the Academy is sufficiently staffed to effectively train
recruits. CPD will further ensure that, except in extraordinary circumstances, courses are
scheduled with sufficient advance time for instructors to be notified of the class and to properly
prepare and deliver quality instruction.
277. CPD will require end-of-course training evaluations of recruits that ensure they
graduate with the requisite knowledge and skills to engage in policing activities safely,
effectively, and lawfully.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
79
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
H. Field Training and Evaluation Program
278. An effective field training program is necessary for reinforcing the policies,
practices, and skills taught in recruit training and instilling in new police officers the principles
of safe, effective, and lawful policing that will guide them throughout their careers. CPD will
sufficiently staff, supervise, and manage its field training program (“Field Training and
Evaluation Program”) to train and evaluate new officers in the necessary skills required to de-
escalate or use force in accordance with the sanctity of life, the law, CPD policy, and this
Agreement.
279. CPD will revise, as necessary and appropriate, the Field Training and Evaluation
Program to comport with CPD’s Training Plan and this Agreement.
280. The Field Training and Evaluation Program will follow recruit training and be at
least 12 weeks in duration and include at least three training cycles. The Field Training and
Evaluation Program will not designate probationary police officers (“PPOs”) as “field qualified,”
as defined by this Agreement, until they have successfully completed the entire program.
281. CPD will review and revise as necessary its FTO selection policies and
procedures to establish and implement a program that effectively attracts and retains qualified
FTOs.
282. CPD’s policies and procedures will continue to delineate the criteria and
methodology for selecting FTOs. Subject to its collective bargaining agreements with the CPD
unions, CPD will review and, as appropriate, revise its eligibility criteria and promotional
practices to ensure that FTOs are selected based on their applications, previous performance as
police officers, FTO training examination scores, and disciplinary histories.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
80
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
283. FTOs will receive initial and refresher training that is adequate in quality,
quantity, scope, and type, and that addresses subjects including, but not limited to management
and mentoring, community policing, effective problem-solving techniques, ethics, diversity, field
communication, and any recent substantive changes made to the recruit training curriculum.
FTOs will receive refresher training on an annual basis as part of the In-Service Training
Program outlined in this Agreement. FTOs will be promptly notified of any substantive changes
to policies and practices that affect their roles as mentors and trainers of recruit officers.
284. FTOs will be required to maintain and demonstrate their proficiency in managing
and mentoring recruits, as well as modeling and teaching, by their example, procedural justice,
de-escalation, impartial policing, and community policing. The Education and Training Division
will maintain documentation of the training of FTOs. The Bureau of Patrol will maintain
documentation of the evaluations of FTOs.
285. CPD will revise the Field Training and Evaluation Program to ensure that no
more than one PPO is assigned to an FTO during each training cycle. The City will provide CPD
with the necessary support and resources to designate a sufficient number of FTOs to meet the
requirements of this Agreement. Officers performing FTO duties in a temporary capacity are
considered FTOs under this Agreement so long as they meet the requirements set forth for FTOs
in this Agreement, except for the selection requirements.
286. CPD will ensure that PPOs in the Field Training and Evaluation Program train
with different FTOs during each of their training cycles.
287. CPD will ensure that PPOs awaiting assignment to an FTO will not be placed on
assignments in the field without adequate supervision. CPD will track and document all instances
of PPOs placed in field assignments prior to starting the Field Training and Evaluation Program.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
81
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
288. The Field Training and Evaluation Program will continue to require that FTOs
document PPO progress and performance each day in the Daily Observation Report, at the end of
each of the first two cycles in the Cycle Summary Report, at the end of the third cycle in the
Final Summary Report and, if necessary, at the end of any additional cycles in the Remedial
Summary Report. FTOs will identify and document in those reports areas for PPO improvement.
289. In each Cycle Summary Report, the FTO will assess whether the PPO should
progress to the next cycle of training based on the PPO’s performance and compliance with the
Field Training and Evaluation Program standards.
290. A PPO must be deemed “field qualified” in order to complete the Field Training
and Evaluation Program. For a PPO to be deemed “field qualified”, all end-of-cycle reports must
be completed by the FTO and reviewed and approved by the necessary supervisors.
291. FTOs may recommend specific remedial field or classroom training for a PPO.
Any recommendation for remedial training will be provided as promptly as possible to the
necessary supervisors and must be documented in the PPO’s training record, including, but not
limited to, the Final Summary Report or Remedial Summary Report. Recommendations for
remedial training must be reviewed by the necessary supervisors and, if approved, recommended
training must be completed by the PPO before the PPO completes the Field Training and
Evaluation Program.
292. The Field Training and Evaluation Review Board, or other entity with similar
responsibilities, will review a PPO’s performance at the request of an assigned FTO or
supervisor and have the power to recommend separation, re-training by the Academy, or
additional field training. A request for review by the Board must be made, and the Board must
convene, if a PPO is not deemed “field qualified” at the end of any remedial training cycle. The
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
82
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Field Training and Evaluation Review Board will provide all such referrals and
recommendations for action to the Chief of the Bureau of Patrol.
293. CPD will create a mechanism for PPOs to provide confidential feedback
regarding their field training, including the extent to which their field training was consistent
with what they learned at the Academy; whether their FTOs did or did not provide effective
guidance and instruction; and suggestions for changes to recruit training based upon their
experience in the Field Training and Evaluation Program.
294. The Education and Training Division and Bureau of Patrol will review, consistent
with their scope of responsibility within the Field Training and Evaluation Program, aggregate
PPO feedback on a quarterly basis; document their responses, including the rationale behind any
responsive action taken or decision to take no action; and share such feedback with the TOC and,
as necessary, FTOs and FTO supervisors.
295. CPD will create a mechanism for FTOs to provide feedback regarding the quality
of the Field Training and Evaluation Program, including suggestions for changes to FTO
training, the PPO evaluation process, and recruit training. The Education and Training Division
and Bureau of Patrol will review, consistent with their scope of responsibility within the Field
Training and Evaluation Program, FTO feedback on a quarterly basis and, as necessary and
appropriate, share such feedback with the TOC, FTOs, and FTO supervisors.
296. The TOC will annually review the Field Training and Evaluation Program and
consider best practices in this area as well as feedback and recommendations from FTOs and
PPOs. Additionally, the TOC will review referrals and recommendations by the Field Training
and Evaluation Review Board to the Bureau of Patrol. Based on this information, the TOC will
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
83
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
recommend to the Superintendent the implementation of any appropriate changes to policies or
procedures related to the Field Training and Evaluation Program.
I. In-Service Training Program
297. Regular in-service training is critical to ensure that CPD officers continue to hone
important policing skills and remain up-to-date on changes in the law, CPD policy, technology,
community expectations, and developments in best practices. In-service training should, as
appropriate, reinforce CPD’s commitment to procedural justice, de-escalation, impartial policing,
and community policing.
298. The Parties recognize that CPD has begun to develop and implement an In-
Service Training Program for its officers. The Parties acknowledge that CPD has developed a
project plan establishing development and implementation of the In-Service Training Program
from 2018 through 2019 that includes the following components:
a. a list of planned courses, including the status of the development and approval
of any new course curricula;
b. the dates that CPD officers collectively will start and complete the planned
courses;
c. the identification of any need for additional instructors, equipment, and
training facilities and a schedule for addressing the needs; and
d. a list of CPD personnel responsible for overseeing each project plan task.
299. CPD will implement the In-Service Training Program to comport with the
Training Plan and the requirements and goals of this Agreement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
84
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
300. The In-Service Training Program will require that all non-probationary police
officers who are active duty and available for assignment, including supervisors and command
staff, receive, at a minimum, the following amount of in-service training each year:
a. 16 hours by the end of 2018;
b. 24 hours by the end of 2019;
c. 32 hours by the end of 2020; and
d. 40 hours by the end of 2021, and in each subsequent year.
301. CPD’s In-Service Training Program will include specific courses that will be
mandatory for every officer in that training year.
302. CPD’s In-Service Training Program may also offer specific courses as elective
subjects. The elective subjects will be selected and approved by the TOC in accordance with the
Training Plan. The TOC will solicit and consider officer requests and will rely on the Education
and Training Division’s needs assessments when selecting and evaluating elective subjects.
303. As part of the In-Service Training Program, mandatory and elective courses will
be apportioned as follows:
a. in 2018, CPD will require that each officer receive at least 16 hours of in-
person mandatory courses;
b. in 2019, CPD will require that each officer receive at least 16 hours of in-
person mandatory courses, with the remaining 8 hours to be provided either as
mandatory or elective courses, as determined by the TOC;
c. in 2020, CPD will require that each officer receive at least 24 hours of in-
person mandatory courses, with the remaining 8 hours to be provided either as
mandatory or elective courses, as determined by the TOC;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
85
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
d. starting in 2021, and every year thereafter, CPD will require that each offer
receive at least 24 hours of in-person mandatory courses with the remaining
16 hours to be provided either as mandatory or elective courses, as determined
by the TOC; and
e. this Agreement does not require CPD to provide more than 40 hours of annual
department-wide in-service training.
304. Various sections of this Agreement contain in-service training requirements
which require CPD to provide some or all of its members with training on specific topics. CPD
retains the discretion to determine the sequencing, scheduling, and location of such training,
unless otherwise specified by this Agreement, provided that: all in-service training identified
herein will begin no later than the 2021 calendar year; is adequate in quantity, quality, type, and
scope; and is consistent with the terms of this Agreement.
305. The Parties acknowledge that CPD has begun to develop and implement
decentralized training in CPD districts and units. To date, decentralized training instructors have
been selected by CPD’s Education and Training Division and have received instructor
certification by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board.
306. Training provided through the In-Service Training Program may take place at the
Academy or in a decentralized manner, including at the district or unit level, so long as the
training is:
a. developed by the Education and Training Division;
b. reviewed by the TOC and approved by the Education and Training Division
before training is delivered; and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
86
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. taught by instructors pursuant to the requirements provided above Part D of
this section.
307. Courses offered by CPD to fulfill the portion of the In-Service Training Program
not required to be delivered in person may be provided through e-learning or other electronic
means, so long as they are reviewed and approved by the TOC and are consistent with this
Agreement. In considering e-learning courses for approval, the TOC will ensure that
instructional objectives can be sufficiently achieved through e-learning. Following the
completion of any e-learning course provided as part of the In-Service Training Program, CPD
will test participants on their comprehension of the underlying subject matter.
308. CPD will develop and implement a process for addressing non-compliance with
training requirements to ensure that all officers who are active duty and available for assignment,
including supervisors and command staff, successfully complete all required training programs
within the time frames set out in this Agreement.
309. Officers, including supervisors and command staff, returning to active duty after
taking a leave of absence of a year or more must complete all mandatory training content
required as part of the In-Service Training Program that was missed during the previous three
years, in addition to the mandatory courses required in the current year.
a. At a minimum:
i. officers must complete training on the content required in Part F of the
Use of Force section of this Agreement before returning to assignment;
and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
87
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
ii. officers must complete training on all other mandatory content required
during the previous three years within the first full year of resumed active
duty.
b. Where the same mandatory content has been updated or required multiple
times during the period of inactivity, officers are only required to take the
most recent offering. The training required in this paragraph will count
towards the total amount of training required by the In-Service Training
Program.
J. Supervisory Training
310. Effective, comprehensive pre-service promotional and in-service training for
supervisors is essential to successful supervision.
311. CPD will require that every newly promoted supervisor, except those promoted to
the rank of Commander and above, receives mandatory supervisory, management, leadership,
and command accountability training, tailored to each level of supervision and command before
assignment to a supervisory rank or assumption of supervisory responsibilities associated with a
particular supervisory rank.
312. CPD will require that supervisors, after their first promotion to the rank of
Commander or above, receive mandatory supervisory, management, leadership, and command
accountability training, tailored to command staff positions within six months of assignment to
or assumption of supervisory responsibilities as a member of command staff.
313. The amount of pre-service promotional training may differ according to rank and
command, but all pre-service promotional training will be adequate in quality, quantity, type, and
scope and will cover topics appropriate to the specific rank and command.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
88
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
314. By January 1, 2020, as appropriate and tailored to the specific rank and command,
pre-service promotional training will include, but not be limited to:
a. an overview of CPD’s department-wide crime reduction strategies;
b. tools and techniques for developing, communicating, and understanding
district-level crime reduction strategies that are consistent with the principles
of community policing and that provide clear direction to officers on
incorporating the principles of community policing in crime reduction
strategies;
c. techniques for effectively guiding and directing officers and promoting
effective and ethical police practices, including detecting and addressing bias-
based profiling and other forms of discriminatory policing;
d. de-escalation strategies and the principles of force mitigation;
e. intervening on a subject’s behalf when observing a use of force that is
excessive or otherwise in violation of policy;
f. evaluating the completeness, correctness, and sufficiency of written reports;
g. monitoring, reviewing, and investigating uses of force to ensure consistency
with CPD policies;
h. understanding the function and proper use of supervisory tools, such as Early
Intervention System (“EIS”) and body-worn cameras, at each rank;
i. evaluating officer performance, informally and formally as part of CPD’s
annual performance evaluation process;
j. CPD and COPA’s disciplinary system requirements and available non-
punitive corrective action;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
89
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
k. mentoring officers and fostering career development;
l. responding to allegations of officer misconduct, including, but not limited to,
excessive force and racial discrimination, for purposes of documenting the
complaint and reporting it to COPA;
m. building community partnerships and guiding officers on how to implement
this requirement; and
n. CPD policy and legal updates.
315. The pre-service promotional training for new Sergeants and Lieutenants will
include a field training component to provide newly promoted supervisors with a better
understanding of the requirements of the position to which they have been promoted.
a. The field training component for new Sergeants will consist of two days of
shadowing current Sergeants in districts: one day observing the activities of a
District Station Supervisor and one day observing the activities of a Field
Sergeant.
b. The field training component for new Lieutenants will consist of one day of
shadowing a current Lieutenant in a district and observing the activities of a
Watch Operations Lieutenant.
316. Within 30 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop a formalized structure for
the field training component to ensure consistency across districts. This structure will include a
process for selecting which supervisors will be shadowed and guidance materials to ensure that
the topics and information regarding supervisor responsibilities covered during the field training
component are consistent with CPD policy and this Agreement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
90
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
317. CPD will ensure that all supervisors who are active duty and available for
assignment also receive in-service training consistent with the requirements of CPD’s In-Service
Training Program. As part of the In-Service Training Program, supervisors will receive refresher
training related to their supervisory duties and training that covers managerial and leadership
skills. The in-service training for supervisors may include, but is not limited to, the topics
identified above for pre-service promotional training.
318. Any training course offered as part of a pre-service promotional training, which is
also a mandatory In-Service Training Program course, satisfies that mandatory In-Service
Training Program requirement. Any other training course completed during a pre-service
promotional training will count towards the total amount of training required by the In-Service
Training Program requirement.
K. Training on this Agreement
319. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, CPD will require that all members who are
active duty and available for assignment are provided with training on the requirements of this
Agreement, together with its goals, implementation process, and timelines.
320. In connection with issuing a policy or procedure pursuant to this Agreement, CPD
will ensure that:
a. all relevant CPD members review their responsibilities pursuant to the policy
or procedure, including the requirements that each member is held
accountable for their compliance and is required to report violations of policy;
b. supervisors of all ranks are informed that they will be held accountable for
identifying and responding to policy or procedure violations by members
under their direct command; and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
91
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. CPD can document that each relevant CPD officer or other employee has
received and reviewed the policy.
VIII. SUPERVISION
A. Guiding Principles
321. Effective supervisors, who lead by example and actively engage with the
subordinates under their direct command, play a critical role in ensuring lawful, safe, effective,
and community-centered policing. To achieve this outcome, the Parties agree to the requirements
set out below.
322. The provisions of this Agreement are designed to ensure that CPD supervisors
provide the effective supervision necessary for members to perform their duties lawfully, safely,
and effectively and for members to improve and grow professionally. Further, the provisions of
this Agreement are designed to allow supervisors to spend time monitoring and training
members under their direct command so as to provide adequate opportunities to prevent,
promptly identify, and promptly correct adverse officer behavior. This meaningful supervision
will facilitate the establishment and re-enforcement of a culture of community policing and
accountability throughout the Department.
323. CPD should have the staffing necessary to promote lawful, safe, effective, and
community-centered policing; provide effective supervision; ensure officer safety and
accountability; and implement the terms of this Agreement.
324. Immediate supervisors of all ranks are responsible for supervising, managing, and
overseeing, as appropriate, the day-to-day work activities of members under their direct
command.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
92
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
325. Supervisors of all ranks are accountable for the performance of subordinate
members directly observed or under their direct command.
326. Effective supervisors will:
a. engage in activities and conduct that support the mission and goals of the
Department, including those set forth in this Agreement;
b. model appropriate conduct, including abiding by high standards of integrity
and adhering to the United States Constitution and other laws, CPD policy,
and the terms of this Agreement; and
c. consistently demonstrate professionalism, courtesy, and respect towards all
people with whom they interact.
B. Responsibilities and Duties
327. CPD will require its supervisors, through policy and auditing, to consistently
apply CPD policies and procedures from shift to shift, among all geographic areas of the city,
and in all units of the Department.
328. By January 1, 2020, CPD will review and, as necessary, revise its policies for
supervision to ensure that such policies set out clear responsibilities for supervisors to comply
with the requirements of this Agreement. CPD will inform all supervisors of their specific duties
and responsibilities that are required by CPD policies, including this Agreement.
329. CPD will require that all supervisors perform their specific duties and
responsibilities in compliance with CPD policy, including the terms of this Agreement.
330. CPD will regularly inform its members, including supervisors, of available
training, professional development opportunities, and employee assistance resources.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
93
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
331. Supervisors of all ranks will effectively supervise the members under their
command to ensure accountability across the Department.
332. Effective supervision requires that all supervisors, at a minimum, will:
a. establish and enforce the expectation that members under their command
perform their duties in a manner that complies with federal and state law, CPD
policy, this Agreement, and that is consistent with the principles of procedural
justice, de-escalation, impartial policing, and community policing;
b. provide leadership, guidance, mentoring, direction, and support to members
under their command to promote improved performance and professional
development; and
c. lead efforts to ensure that members under their command are working actively
to engage the community and promote public trust and safety.
333. Additionally, effective supervision requires that immediate supervisors will, for
members under their direct command:
a. respond to, review, and investigate uses of force and other incidents and
conduct as required by CPD policy and this Agreement;
b. monitor, manage, and coordinate incident response;
c. confirm the correctness, sufficiency, and completeness of written reports
submitted for review and approval;
d. identify any adverse behavior or misconduct and ensure that it is adequately
addressed through corrective action, training, or referral for discipline;
e. respond appropriately to each complaint of misconduct received, in
accordance with CPD’s complaint and disciplinary policies;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
94
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
f. review and act upon information regarding at-risk behavior by the members
under their direct command, as required by the Data Collection, Analysis, and
Management section of this Agreement;
g. advise members under their direct command of available training, professional
development opportunities, and employee assistance resources;
h. conduct annual performance evaluations and meet with members under their
direct command on an ongoing basis as necessary to provide guidance,
mentoring, direction, and support to the members regarding their performance
and to identify areas for improvement; and
i. document the performance of their supervisory duties as required by CPD
policy and this Agreement using the appropriate records management system,
the Performance Recognition System (“PRS”), and/or the EIS.
334. During their tour of duty, immediate supervisors in the Bureau of Patrol will
spend time interacting with, observing, and overseeing the members under their direct command,
including time in the field, consistent with their duty assignment.
335. Immediate supervisors will be required to document their actions taken with
members under their direct command, pursuant to CPD policy, including, but not limited to:
a. non-disciplinary or corrective actions, including, but not limited to, those
taken pursuant to any internal or external review of the conduct of CPD
officers or taken pursuant to the operation of any existing and future
automated electronic systems contemplated by Part D of the Data Collection,
Analysis, and Management section of this Agreement;
b. disciplinary referrals;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
95
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. response to incident scenes as required by CPD policy;
d. observations of member conduct, as required by CPD policy; and
e. reviews and investigations of reportable uses of force and other reports
required by CPD policy and this Agreement.
C. Staffing, Allocation, and Deployment
1. Generally
336. As otherwise set out in this Agreement, CPD will ensure that it makes staffing
and allocation decisions that provide for:
a. the number of patrol field supervisors to ensure span of control and unity of
command as required in this Part;
b. the number of well-trained, qualified FTOs, as required in Part H of the
Training section of this Agreement;
c. the number of well-trained, qualified staff to train recruits and officers, as
required in Part D of the Training section of this Agreement;
d. the number of well-trained, qualified staff to conduct timely misconduct
investigations, as required in the Accountability and Transparency section of
this Agreement;
e. the number of certified CIT Officers, as required in Part D of the Crisis
Intervention section of this Agreement; and
f. the number of officer assistance and wellness staff as required in the Officer
Wellness and Support section of this Agreement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
96
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
2. Unity of Command and Span of Control
337. The City and CPD will deploy a sufficient amount of qualified supervisors to
provide effective supervision, as outlined in this section.
338. For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
a. “District law enforcement” means the CPD patrol districts, which are
currently organized into three police areas (North, Central, South), with the
responsibility of general field operations, including but not limited to, the
protection of life and property; enforcement of laws and ordinances; and
response to dispatched calls for service.
b. “Field units” means the primary beat cars, rapid response cars, and watch
specialty cars (squadrol, traffic car, and park car), assigned to watch field
operations in district law enforcement.
c. “Sector” means a specific and contiguous grouping of geographic beats within
a designated district or a Sergeant and a team of officers assigned to field units
within district law enforcement.
d. “Span of control” means the number of officers assigned to each immediate
supervisor for a tour of duty.
e. “Unity of command” means officers are supervised by a consistent and clearly
identified immediate supervisor. Additionally, officers and their immediate
supervisor will regularly have the same start time, the same day-off-group,
and patrol the same geographic areas.
339. CPD will ensure that the principles of unity of command and span of control are
realized for watch personnel assigned to field units within district law enforcement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
97
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
340. By January 1, 2020, CPD will develop a staffing model to achieve the principles
of unity of command and span of control. CPD’s staffing model will identify methods to
implement unity of command and a span of control ratio of no more than ten officers to one
Sergeant for all field units on each watch in each of CPD’s patrol districts. To achieve this
objective, CPD will maintain, at a minimum, one Sergeant for each sector.
341. In order to achieve unity of command and a span of control of no more than ten
officers to one Sergeant in the field units on each watch in each patrol district, the staffing model
may consider:
a. staffing requirements for watch operations, including, but not limited to,
watch personnel assigned to field duties and watch administration functions;
b. staffing requirements for all other district law enforcement functions,
including, but not limited to, district administration, community policing, and
tactical teams;
c. data-driven resource allocation methods incorporating district-specific factors,
including, but not limited to, calls for service, public violence, and property
crime; and
d. any other considerations CPD deems relevant to achieving unity of command
and a span of control ratio of no more than ten officers to one Sergeant in all
field units on each watch of the City’s patrol districts.
342. By January 1, 2020, CPD will develop a system and protocols to allow the
Department to assess, both long-term and on a day-to-day basis, whether field units on each
watch in each patrol district meet the requirements for unity of command and span of control.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
98
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
343. When calculating the span of control ratios for field units, CPD may not use
department-wide averages or factor in span of control ratios for Bureau of Patrol units or
functions that are not included in the definition of field units above.
344. Beginning no later than January 31, 2020, CPD will begin to implement a staffing
model to achieve unity of command and a span of control ratio of no more than ten officers to
one Sergeant assigned to field units on each watch in each patrol district.
345. By January 31, 2022, CPD will fully implement and maintain a staffing model
that achieves unity of command and a span of control ratio of no more than ten officers to one
Sergeant for all field units on each watch in each of CPD’s patrol districts. To achieve this
objective, CPD will maintain, at a minimum, one Sergeant for each sector.
346. CPD will continue to maintain unity of command and a span of control ratio of no
more than ten officers to one Sergeant for district tactical teams and area saturation teams.
347. CPD may review and revise its staffing model as necessary to ensure that all field
units on each watch in each patrol district achieve unity of command and a span of control ratio
of no more than ten officers to one Sergeant.
348. Beginning 365 days after the Effective Date, and annually thereafter, the Monitor
will review and assess CPD’s progress toward achieving unity of command and a span of control
ratio of no more than ten officers to one Sergeant.
D. Performance Evaluation
349. A performance evaluation process will enable CPD to identify, support, and
recognize members who perform their duties lawfully, safely, and effectively, as well as to
identify and respond to members who perform poorly, demonstrate adverse behaviors, or engage
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
99
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
in inappropriate conduct or conduct that otherwise undermines member or public safety and
community trust.
350. CPD’s performance evaluation process will identify, support, and recognize
members’ activity, performance, and conduct through an assessment of specific quantitative and
qualitative performance dimensions, which will address, among other things, constitutional
policing, community policing, problem-solving, and the effective use of de-escalation. Although
CPD may use quantitative measures in evaluating members to ensure that members are
performing their required duties, CPD will not require members to achieve specific numerical
thresholds, such as the number of arrests, investigatory stops, or citations. CPD will ensure that
its performance evaluation process is consistent with the law and best practices. Within 18
months of the Effective Date, CPD will revise its performance evaluation policies and practices
as necessary to meet the requirements of this Agreement.
351. Annual performance evaluations for members of all ranks, excluding the
Superintendent, will be based upon work performance completed during a specific rating period
and will include a written description of performance dimension expectations; the member’s
proficiency in fulfilling the specific duties and responsibilities of the assigned position, unit, or
team; any areas of particular growth and achievement; and areas where the member requires
further support and/or supervision. The evaluation process will provide for support, feedback,
communication of expectations, and, when appropriate, corrective actions.
352. CPD will require supervisors of all ranks to conduct timely, accurate, and
complete performance evaluations.
353. Supervisors may only conduct a performance evaluation of members they have
directly supervised and observed during the specific rating period.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
100
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
354. In addition to the formal annual performance evaluation, supervisors will meet
with members under their direct command on an ongoing basis as necessary to provide guidance,
mentoring, direction, and support to the members regarding their performance and to identify
opportunities for improvement.
355. Supervisors will recognize, when appropriate, formally (e.g., recommendation for
commendation) and/or informally (e.g., public and private praise) subordinate members who
demonstrate a commitment to procedural justice, de-escalation, impartial policing, and/or
community policing.
356. CPD will maintain records of performance evaluations in the appropriate
electronic data tracking system.
IX. OFFICER WELLNESS AND SUPPORT
A. Guiding Principles
357. In fulfilling their duties, CPD members expose themselves to significant danger,
high stress, and a wide spectrum of human tragedy. There is growing recognition that
psychological and emotional wellness are critical to officers’ health, relationships, job
performance, and safety. The City and CPD have an obligation to help CPD members cope with
the consequences that come from their service to the public.
358. The City and CPD’s obligation to CPD members includes providing adequate
support systems to treat members experiencing mental health, substance abuse, and other
emotional challenges.
359. The City and CPD’s obligation to CPD members also includes equipping them in
a manner that enables them to do their jobs as safely as reasonably possible. CPD will ensure that
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
101
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
the safety of its members is not jeopardized by equipment and technology that is outdated,
broken, or in need of repair or replacement.
360. The City and CPD will implement the following requirements in order to achieve
a healthy, effective, and constitutionally compliant police force.
B. Expanding and Improving Officer Support Systems
361. CPD will provide its members with a range of support services that comport with
mental health professional standards and that seek to minimize the risk of harm from stress,
trauma, alcohol and substance abuse, and mental illness. These support services will include:
readily accessible confidential counseling services with both internal and external referrals; peer
support; traumatic incident debriefings and crisis counseling; and stress management and officer
wellness training.
1. Officer Support Systems Plan
362. CPD currently offers clinical counseling services, programs regarding alcoholism
and other addictions, and a peer support program to help CPD members cope with the
psychological and personal toll their jobs can impose. By September 1, 2019, CPD will complete
a needs assessment to determine what additional resources are necessary to ensure the support
services available to CPD members comport with best practices and mental health professional
standards.
363. The needs assessment should analyze, at a minimum:
a. staffing levels in CPD’s Professional Counseling Division;
b. the current workload of the licensed mental health professionals and drug and
alcohol counselors employed by CPD;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
102
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. how long it takes CPD members requesting counseling services to be seen by
a licensed mental health professional or drug and alcohol counselor;
d. the professional specialties of CPD’s licensed mental health professionals;
e. the frequency and reasons for referrals of CPD members to clinical service
providers external to CPD and the quality of those services;
f. CPD member feedback, through statistically valid surveys that ensure
anonymity to participants consistent with established Professional Counseling
Division guidelines, regarding the scope and nature of the support services
needs of CPD members and the quality and availability of services and
programs currently provided through the Employee Assistance Program;
g. similar mental health services offered in other large departments, including
the ratio of licensed mental health professionals to sworn officers and the
number of counseling hours provided per counselor per week;
h. guidance available from law enforcement professional associations;
i. the frequency and adequacy of CPD’s communications to CPD members
regarding the support services available to them;
j. the frequency, quality, and demand for in-service trainings related to stress
management, officer wellness, and related topics; and
k. the quality of recruit training related to stress management, officer wellness,
and related topics.
364. Within 60 days of the completion of the needs assessment, CPD will develop a
plan, including a timeline for implementation, to prioritize and address the needs identified
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
103
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
through the needs assessment required by the immediately preceding paragraph (“Officer
Support Systems Plan”).
365. As a component of CPD’s Officer Support Systems Plan, CPD will develop and
implement a communications strategy. The objectives of this communications strategy will be:
a. to inform CPD members of the support services available to them;
b. to address stigmas, misinformation, or other potential barriers to members
using these services; and
c. to emphasize that supporting officer wellness is an integral part of CPD’s
operations.
366. As part of this communications strategy, CPD will, at a minimum:
a. make information about the support services available, on a continuing basis,
to members on its internal websites;
b. post information, including pamphlets and posters, in each CPD facility in
areas frequented by officers;
c. issue wallet-sized cards to every CPD member with contact information for
the CPD support services available;
d. inform and remind members about the CPD support services offered,
including providing handouts with contact information, at the annual use of
force training required by this Agreement, during Academy training of new
recruits, and at in-service trainings relating to stress management and officer
wellness;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
104
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
e. provide training to supervisory personnel regarding available CPD officer
support services and strategies for communicating with officers about these
services in a manner that minimizes any perceived stigma; and
f. seek to identify and correct misperceptions among CPD members about
receiving counseling services.
367. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will develop and implement a roll
call training to explain and address the effects on Firearm Owners Identification (“FOID”) card
eligibility, if any, when a CPD member seeks or receives CPD support services, including, but
not limited to, counseling and mental health treatment.
368. As a component of the Officer Support Systems Plan, by January 1, 2020, CPD
will develop and implement a comprehensive suicide prevention initiative (“Suicide Prevention
Initiative”). In designing the Suicide Prevention Initiative, CPD will examine similar initiatives
implemented in other large departments and incorporate guidance available from law
enforcement professional associations. The Suicide Prevention Initiative will be overseen by a
licensed mental health professional working in conjunction with a command staff member.
369. At least annually, the Director of the Professional Counseling Division will
provide a written report to the Superintendent, through his or her chain of command, that
includes anonymized data regarding support services provided to CPD members, how long it
takes CPD members requesting counseling services to receive them, and other metrics related to
the quality and availability of these services. This report will also contain resource, training, and
policy recommendations necessary to ensure that the support services available to CPD members
reasonably address their identified needs and comply with the Officer Support Systems Plan.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
105
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
2. Clinical Mental Health Services
370. CPD currently employs three licensed mental health professionals and a
supervising psychologist who serves as the Director of CPD’s Professional Counseling Division.
CPD offers free counseling services to CPD members through the Professional Counseling
Division and through external referrals in certain circumstances. CPD will expand its capacity to
provide the counseling services to CPD members as set forth in this Agreement.
371. CPD will initially increase the staffing level in its Professional Counseling
Division to at least ten full-time licensed mental health professionals (or a combination of full-
and part-time licensed mental health professionals capable of providing an equivalent amount of
weekly clinical therapy hours) by January 1, 2020. CPD may contract with licensed mental
health professionals external to CPD on an interim basis while CPD completes the process for
creating these new positions and hiring individuals to fill them. Additional changes to staffing
levels will be made consistent with the results of the needs assessment and Officer Support
Systems Plan.
372. CPD will ensure that its staff of licensed mental health professionals includes
individuals with specialized training in one or more of each of the following subjects: post-
traumatic stress disorder, domestic violence, alcohol and substance abuse, anger management,
depression, and anxiety.
373. In order to provide support services that are culturally appropriate, sensitive to
differing circumstances, and attentive to the issues facing all CPD members, including, but not
limited to, women, people of color, religious minorities, and LGBTQI individuals, CPD will
ensure that:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
106
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. the licensed mental health professionals and counselors employed by CPD are
trained and equipped to provide services in a manner respectful of these
diverse experiences and perspectives;
b. CPD members receiving services have the opportunity to provide feedback
regarding whether such services are culturally appropriate and adapted to
diverse experiences and perspectives; and
c. appropriate corrective action is taken to the extent necessary based on
feedback received.
374. CPD will offer members referrals for counseling services by external clinical
service providers, including, but not limited to, private therapists, specialists, outside agencies, or
hospitals, when a member requires specialized counseling that is beyond the training and
expertise of CPD’s licensed mental health professionals or certified counselors.
375. CPD will ensure that CPD members have access to:
a. non-emergency, generalized counseling sessions with CPD’s licensed mental
health professionals within two weeks of a member’s request; and
b. generalized emergency counseling by CPD’s licensed mental health
professionals within 24 hours of a member’s request.
376. CPD will continue to ensure that any mental health counseling services provided
to CPD members remain confidential in accordance with state law, federal law, and current CPD
policy.
377. CPD will continue to ensure that licensed mental health professionals employed
by the Professional Counseling Division do not participate in fitness for duty evaluations, which
will be conducted exclusively by third-party licensed mental health professionals.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
107
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
3. Alcohol and Other Addiction Services
378. CPD currently employs five drug and alcohol counselors, all of whom are sworn
CPD officers operating under the supervision of the Director of the Professional Counseling
Division. These counselors provide free counseling for alcohol and substance abuse. CPD will
continue to offer counseling services to CPD members for alcohol and substance abuse.
379. CPD will ensure the number of drug and alcohol counselors available, either on
staff or through referrals, meets the needs of CPD members consistent with the needs assessment
and the Officer Support System Plan.
380. CPD will ensure that its drug and alcohol counselors are certified in Illinois as
Certified Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Counselors.
381. CPD currently offers anonymous support groups and programs for alcoholism and
other addictions. CPD will ensure that a licensed mental health professional assigned to the
Professional Counseling Division oversees any such programs offered by CPD, that the
programs adhere to generally accepted practices in the field of addiction treatment (e.g., 12-step
addiction treatment program), and that each program is reviewed at least annually by the
Director of the Professional Counseling Division.
382. CPD will train all supervisors regarding recognizing signs and symptoms of
alcoholism and substance abuse, how to recommend available support services to CPD members
experiencing alcoholism and substance abuse issues, and their obligations under CPD policy to
report members exhibiting signs of alcohol or drug impairment.
4. Peer Support Program
383. CPD currently has a peer support program consisting of specially trained
volunteer officers (“Peer Support Officers”). A well-run peer support program can provide an
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
108
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
important access point for CPD members encountering challenging emotional or personal
circumstances.
384. CPD will maintain a peer support program, ensuring that:
a. a licensed mental health professional assigned to the Professional Counseling
Division oversees and adequately manages the program;
b. Peer Support Officers receive initial training in stress management, grief
management, officer wellness, obligations and limitations regarding
confidentiality and privacy, communication skills, common psychological
symptoms and conditions, suicide assessment and prevention, dependency and
abuse, and support services available to CPD members;
c. Peer Support Officers are trained to recommend the services offered by the
Professional Counseling Division in situations that are beyond the scope of
their training;
d. CPD offers Peer Support Officers the opportunity to meet at least annually to
share successful strategies and identify ways to enhance the program;
e. Peer Support Officers receive and comply with a written procedures manual
approved by a licensed mental health professional assigned to the Professional
Counseling Division;
f. Peer Support Officers are offered sufficient non-monetary incentives and
recognition to ensure broad recruitment of volunteers and widespread access
to peer support services; and
g. the scope and quantity of peer support services provided to CPD members are
identified in a manner that facilitates effective management of the program
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
109
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
and that preserves the anonymity and confidentiality of members receiving
peer support services.
5. Chaplains Unit
385. CPD maintains a Chaplains Unit consisting of CPD officers and non-CPD
volunteers, operating under the supervision of a Director, who reports directly to a command
staff member.
386. By January 1, 2020, CPD will develop and adopt a standard operating procedure
(“SOP”) outlining the roles and responsibilities of the Chaplains Unit. The Chaplains Unit SOP
will identify that:
a. the purpose of the Chaplains Unit is to:
i. support the wellness of CPD members who voluntarily seek consultation
with representatives of the Chaplains Unit;
ii. make referrals to licensed mental health professionals and other service
providers, when appropriate;
iii. provide pastoral care to CPD members who voluntarily seek such services;
iv. offer voluntary preventive programs for the purposes of supporting,
encouraging, and affirming CPD members in their professional and family
lives; and
v. provide support in moments of crisis as requested by CPD members.
b. when acting in the official capacity of a CPD Chaplain, representatives of the
Chaplains Unit will refrain from actions or statements that are inconsistent
with CPD policy.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
110
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. representatives of the Chaplains Unit, including CPD members and non-CPD
members, will receive training regarding the roles and responsibilities of the
Chaplains Unit.
6. Traumatic Incident Response
387. CPD will continue to require that whenever a CPD member has experienced a
duty-related traumatic incident, the member must attend counseling with a licensed mental health
professional. The Director of the Professional Counseling Division or his or designee will be
responsible for documenting that a CPD member has attended the mandatory counseling and has
completed the requirements of the Traumatic Incident Stress Management Program prior to the
member returning to regular duty assignment. CPD will require any CPD member who has
experienced a duty-related traumatic incident, unless medically unable to do so, to meet with a
licensed mental health professional within seven days of the incident, and will ensure that it has
an adequate staff of licensed mental health professionals who can accommodate this timing
requirement.
388. In addition to providing mandatory initial consultations and additional
consultations as appropriate or as requested by CPD members, CPD’s licensed mental health
professionals will follow up with members who have experienced a duty-related traumatic
incident within six months to offer additional support services.
389. CPD has also implemented a mandatory program for members who have
experienced an officer-involved firearms discharge that consists of peer group discussions and
other components. CPD will ensure that this program is overseen by a licensed mental health
professional assigned to the Professional Counseling Division, reflects best practices, and
comports with CPD’s use of force policies and training.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
111
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
390. CPD will continue to place any CPD member who has discharged a firearm,
excluding training discharges, unintentional discharges, or discharges for the destruction of an
animal where no person was injured, on mandatory administrative duty assignment for a
minimum period of 30 days. Prior to permitting the member to return to regular field duties, CPD
will require the member to (a) complete the Traumatic Incident Stress Management Program and
any training determined by CPD to be appropriate; and (b) receive authorization from the First
Deputy Superintendent. Authorization to return to regular field duties may be withheld pending
the outcome of any administrative or criminal investigation.
391. At least annually, CPD will determine whether members who have experienced a
duty-related traumatic incident have attended the mandatory counseling sessions and have
completed the Traumatic Incident Stress Management Program.
7. Training
392. Where it would add to the quality or effectiveness of the training, CPD will
involve mental health professionals, as feasible, practical, and appropriate, in developing and
reviewing recruit and in-service training on stress management, alcohol and substance abuse,
officer wellness, and the support services available to CPD members.
393. CPD will involve experts, such as psychologists and cognitive and behavioral
scientists, in developing training on use of force where their expertise would enhance the
effectiveness of the training. The training topics that may benefit from such expertise could
include:
a. peer intervention by fellow officers to stop the use of excessive force;
b. the interaction of human perception and threat assessment; and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
112
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. de-escalation and defusing techniques, including psychological methods of
situation control, verbal control and communication, conflict resolution, and
anger management.
394. CPD will ensure that all CPD members are provided in-service training on stress
management, alcohol and substance abuse, and officer wellness at least every three years. CPD
will include training regarding stress management, alcohol and substance abuse, officer wellness,
and support services in the recruit training program.
C. Equipment and Technology
395. By July 1, 2020, and periodically thereafter, CPD will conduct a department-wide
equipment and technology audit to determine what equipment is outdated, broken, or otherwise
in need of repair or replacement. During each audit, CPD will solicit feedback from
representatives of the collective bargaining units representing CPD members.
396. Within 90 days of the completion of the initial audit, CPD will develop a plan,
including a timeline for implementation, to prioritize and address the needs for repair or
replacement of equipment and technology as identified through the needs assessment
(“Equipment and Technology Audit Response Plan”).
397. As a component of the Equipment and Technology Audit Response Plan, CPD
will develop a schedule for future periodic audits. The schedule will specify the time period
within which future periodic audits will occur. The time period may vary for different equipment
types to account for differences in the expected useful life of different equipment types. CPD
will perform the periodic audits in accordance with the schedule.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
113
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
398. In order to facilitate physical health and mental well-being, CPD will ensure its
members have access to exercise equipment at CPD facilities in geographically dispersed areas
throughout the City.
X. ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY
A. Guiding Principles
399. Holding public servants accountable when they violate law or policy is essential
to ensuring legitimacy and community confidence.
400. A robust and well-functioning accountability system in which CPD members are
held to the highest standards of integrity is critical to CPD’s legitimacy and is a priority of CPD.
A culture of accountability also promotes employee safety and morale, and improves the
effectiveness of CPD operations. Organizational justice also plays an important role in ensuring
that CPD members have confidence in the legitimacy of the system that holds them accountable.
401. In order to foster public trust and receive critically important community
feedback, and promote confidence in CPD, the City and CPD will ensure the process for
submitting and pursuing complaints that allege violations of CPD policy or the law by CPD
members is open and accessible for all individuals who wish to file complaints.
402. Meaningful community involvement is imperative to CPD accountability and
transparency. Nothing in this Agreement should be construed as limiting or impeding community
participation in CPD’s accountability system, including the creation and participation of a
community safety oversight board. OAG and the City acknowledge the significant work many of
Chicago’s community organizations have undertaken and are continuing to undertake, including
work alongside CPD, in the area of police reform and accountability, and OAG knows this
critical work will continue.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
114
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
403. The City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that all complaints of misconduct, whether
from internal or external sources, are thoroughly, fairly, timely, and efficiently investigated in
accordance with this Agreement; that all investigative findings are supported by the appropriate
standard of proof and documented in writing; and that all CPD members who commit
misconduct are held accountable pursuant to a disciplinary system that is fair, timely and
consistent, and provides due process.
B. Receiving and Tracking Misconduct Complaints
404. When members of the public submit complaints to the City (“complainants”),
those complaints must be courteously received, properly classified, and efficiently investigated.
Throughout a non-criminal investigation related to misconduct or the actions of a member (an
“administrative investigation”), complainants should be able to track the status of their
complaints and receive current, accurate information.
1. Receiving Complaints
405. The City, CPD, and COPA will ensure individuals are allowed to submit
complaints in multiple ways, including: in person to COPA or at a CPD district station, by
telephone, online, anonymously, and through third party representatives. To ensure broad and
easy access to its complaint system, within 90 days of the Effective Date:
a. the City, CPD, and COPA will make the process for filing a complaint widely
available to the public, including in-person, by telephone, and online;
b. the City, CPD, and COPA will make the process for filing a complaint
available electronically;
c. the City, CPD, and COPA will make information on filing a complaint and
accompanying instructions accessible to people who speak languages other
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
115
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
than English and will provide telephonic language interpretation services
consistent with the City’s and CPD’s existing limited English proficiency
policies and this Agreement;
d. the City, CPD, and COPA will ensure individuals may submit allegations of
misconduct, regardless of whether the individual is a member or perceived
member of an identifiable group, based upon, but not limited to: race,
ethnicity, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, disability status, gender,
gender identity, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, military
discharge status, financial status, or lawful source of income;
e. the City, CPD, and COPA will continue to ensure that members of the public
may make complaints via telephone using free 24-hour services, including by
calling 311 and being given the option to leave a voicemail for COPA or
speak to a CPD supervisor, and will clearly display this information on their
respective websites and other appropriate City and CPD printed materials;
f. the City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that instructions for submitting
complaints are available via telephone, on-line, and in-person; and
g. the City and CPD will ensure that complaint filing information is prominently
displayed on CPD website’s homepage, including by linking to COPA’s
online complaint form.
406. As part of the COPA’s system for processing non-confidential complaints and
administrative notifications (the “intake process”), each complaint and administrative
notification will be assigned a unique tracking number. This unique tracking number will be
linked with all phases of the investigation and disciplinary process, through the final disposition.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
116
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
407. The City and CPD will ensure all complaints are accepted, documented,
submitted to COPA, and investigated in accordance with this Agreement and the applicable
collective bargaining agreement, whether submitted: by a CPD member or a member of the
public; verbally or in writing; in person, by telephone, online, or by a complainant anonymously;
or by a third-party representative.
408. When a CPD member becomes aware of an individual who wants to make a
complaint regarding a CPD member’s conduct, he or she will promptly provide the individual
with COPA’s contact information and notify a supervisor of the complaint received in the field.
CPD will also ensure that, in response to complaints about CPD members, supervisors respond to
the scene, document the complaint, and submit it to COPA. If the supervisor allegedly
authorized, engaged in conduct that led to, witnessed, or otherwise allegedly participated in the
incident complained of the supervisor will contact his or her immediate supervisor, who will
assign another supervisor to immediately document the complaint and submit it to COPA.
409. The City will continue to ensure that a website is made available to CPD members
to anonymously report officer misconduct (“anonymous reporting website”) and will internally
disseminate information regarding the anonymous reporting website to all CPD members.
Reports made on the anonymous reporting website will not relieve CPD members of their duties
under CPD Rules of Conduct 21 and 22.
410. COPA will ensure that individuals who submit electronic complaints receive a
copy of the information contained in the complaint via electronic mail, if an electronic mail
address is provided, upon submission.
411. The City and CPD will undertake best efforts to ensure that the absence of a
signed complainant affidavit alone will not preclude an administrative investigation.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
117
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
412. The City and CPD will require that complaints about any CPD member are
accepted, documented, submitted to COPA, and investigated even if the complainant could not
identify the CPD member’s name or other employee-identifying number, including star or badge
number.
413. CPD will require that officers provide their name and star number, or in the case
of non-sworn members other employee-identifying number, to any member of the public, upon
request.
414. When CPD responds to or investigates incidents involving allegations of officer-
involved domestic violence, CPD will ensure that COPA is provided an administrative
notification. COPA will initiate the intake process and investigate all such allegations in
accordance with this Agreement.
415. The City, CPD, and COPA will require that complaints alleging that a CPD
member refused to accept a complaint, discouraged the filing of a complaint, or provided false or
misleading information about filing a complaint are accepted, documented, and submitted to
COPA for investigation and, where appropriate, recommended for discipline.
416. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, CPD will ensure that there are adequate
policies and practices in place to encourage and protect CPD members who report potential
misconduct by other CPD members. Such policies will provide, at a minimum:
a. that CPD members promptly report any misconduct of which they are aware
to a supervisor;
b. that the supervisor document such alleged misconduct and promptly report it
to COPA; and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
118
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. that all forms of retaliation, interference, intimidation, and coercion against a
CPD member who reports misconduct or cooperates with an investigation of
misconduct, are strictly prohibited.
417. CPD will expressly prohibit all forms of retaliation, intimidation, coercion, or
adverse action against any person who reports misconduct or cooperates with an administrative
investigation.
2. Classifying and Tracking Investigations
418. OAG acknowledges that the City, CPD, and COPA are working to create an
electronic Case Management System (“CMS”). The City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that the
CMS maintains accurate data regarding the number, classification, and status of all
administrative investigations, from the intake process through the final disciplinary decision, if
any, and through any grievance process, arbitration, Police Board proceeding or appeal relating
to the final disciplinary decision (the “final disposition”). CMS will be maintained by appropriate
personnel from the City, CPD, and COPA. The CMS will be fully operational by 2020.
419. The City and CPD will ensure that complainants and their representatives are able
to track non-confidential unique tracking numbers from the intake process through final
disposition via telephone and in person. By 2020, the City will also ensure complainants and
their representatives are able to track the status of non-confidential unique tracking numbers
from the intake process through final disposition online.
420. The City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that all non-confidential complaints are
processed by COPA as follows:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
119
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. all non-confidential complaints of alleged misconduct received by CPD,
including BIA and CPD supervisors, are documented and submitted to COPA
within 24 hours of receipt;
b. all complaints of alleged misconduct submitted to the anonymous reporting
website and all non-confidential complaints of alleged misconduct received by
the OIG will be submitted to COPA by the end of the next business day after
the complaint was received;
c. upon receipt of a complaint, COPA will promptly assign the complaint a
unique tracking number, make an initial determination of the classification(s)
of the alleged misconduct, and will either retain the complaint for
investigation or transfer the complaint to BIA for investigation;
d. COPA, pursuant to its ordinance and this Agreement, will have the
jurisdiction to conduct administrative investigations of all allegations of
misconduct that involve:
i. excessive force;
ii. domestic violence;
iii. improper search or seizure of individuals or property;
iv. coercion;
v. verbal abuse as defined under Municipal Code of Chicago, § 2-78-100,
including any unwelcome sexual advances or requests for sexual favors; or
vi. unlawful denial of access to counsel.
e. COPA, pursuant to its ordinance and this Agreement, will receive immediate
administrative notification of and have jurisdiction to conduct administrative
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
120
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
investigations of all incidents, including those in which no allegation of
misconduct has been made, involving:
i. firearm discharges by CPD officers that could potentially strike an
individual (“officer-involved shooting”);
ii. Taser or stun gun discharges by CPD officers that result in death or
serious bodily injury;
iii. any person who dies or sustains serious bodily injury while in CPD
custody, or as a result of CPD actions;
iv. “officer-involved deaths,” as that term is defined in 50 ILCS 727/1-5; and
v. other weapons discharges and other uses of CPD-issued equipment as a
weapon that results in death or serious bodily injury, at the COPA Chief
Administrator’s discretion;
f. the City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that all allegations are recorded and
classified appropriately, even if the complainant does not accurately
characterize the alleged misconduct;
g. if BIA or district personnel conducting investigations into misconduct identify
allegations of misconduct that are within COPA’s administrative investigative
jurisdiction as defined herein, the investigator will promptly notify COPA;
and
h. if a complaint contains multiple allegations of misconduct, one or more of
which falls within COPA’s administrative investigation jurisdiction as defined
herein, COPA will have the right of first refusal to conduct an administrative
investigation of the entire complaint.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
121
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
421. The City will undertake best efforts to ensure that COPA has jurisdiction to
conduct administrative investigations of allegations of officer-involved sexual misconduct, as
defined by this Agreement.
422. Consistent with COPA’s jurisdiction, after conferring about the details of a
particular criminal sexual misconduct investigation involving a CPD member, COPA and BIA
may jointly agree that BIA may conduct the administrative investigation into allegations of
sexual misconduct when they jointly determine that doing so avoids unnecessary disruption to
the complainant.
423. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, CPD will create a written policy regarding
the circumstances under which BIA will retain and investigate complaints itself and under which
BIA will transfer complaints to a CPD district for investigation. The policy will include as
factors in that decision: consideration of the involved CPD member’s complaint and disciplinary
history and the seriousness of the alleged misconduct. It will be designed to ensure that all
investigations are completed in a timely and thorough manner and in compliance with this
Agreement.
424. Within ten days of the final disciplinary decision of each complaint of sexual
misconduct or sexual assault against a CPD member alleging conduct against a non-CPD
member, the City will provide the Deputy PSIG with the complete administrative investigative
file, subject to applicable law. The Deputy PSIG will review and analyze each administrative
investigative file and, on an annual basis, the Deputy PSIG will publish a report:
a. assessing the quality of the sexual misconduct or sexual assault administrative
investigations reviewed;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
122
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
b. recommending changes in policies and practices to better prevent, detect, or
investigate officer-involved sexual misconduct or sexual assault; and
c. providing aggregate data on the administrative investigations reviewed,
including:
i. the volume and nature of allegations investigated, broken down by
investigating agency;
ii. the percentage of investigations referred to the Cook County State’s
Attorney’s Office (“CCSAO”) for criminal review;
iii. the percentage of investigations criminally prosecuted;
iv. the percentage of investigations closed after the preliminary investigation;
v. the percentage of investigations closed for lack of a signed complainant
affidavit; and
vi. the investigative findings and recommendations, including a summary
breakdown of discipline recommended for investigations with sustained
findings.
425. The City will use best efforts to initiate and undertake a process with the CCSAO
to share information on at least a quarterly basis regarding any affirmative judicial findings made
during the course of criminal proceedings that a CPD member was untruthful, including any
findings made at suppression hearings. Upon receipt of information from the CCSAO that may
suggest misconduct COPA will initiate the intake process.
3. Communicating with Complainants and CPD Members
426. In the course of investigating a complaint, the City, CPD, and COPA will ensure:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
123
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. within five business days of receipt of a non-confidential complaint COPA or
BIA will send non-anonymous complainants or their representatives a written
notice of receipt. The notice will include the unique tracking number assigned
to the complaint. The notice will advise the complainant or his or her
representative whether BIA or COPA will be investigating the complaint, and
how the complainant or his or her representative may inquire about the status
of the investigation. The notice will not contain any language discouraging
participation in the investigation.
b. within 60 days of the final disciplinary decision the complainant will be
provided a copy of the Administrative Summary Report.
427. The City and CPD will require that all COPA and BIA personnel and
Accountability Sergeants communicate with complainants and involved CPD members in a
professional and respectful manner.
428. If COPA, BIA, or the district does not arrive at the investigative findings and
recommendations within 180 days, COPA, BIA or an Accountability Sergeant will, thereafter,
periodically, but not less than once every 60 days, attempt contact with the complainant or his or
her representative to provide status updates until the investigative findings and recommendations
are issued. Such contacts will be documented in the administrative investigative file. By 2020,
this requirement will be satisfied by providing complainants and their representatives the ability
to track the status of non-confidential unique tracking numbers from the intake process through
final disposition online.
429. The City and CPD will notify the complainant in writing if an officer elects to file
a labor grievance relating to any discipline imposed as a result of the complainant’s complaint.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
124
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Upon reaching the final disposition, the City and CPD will advise the complainant in writing of
the final disposition.
430. CPD will develop and implement policies to ensure that a CPD member who is
alleged to be involved in misconduct (the “involved member”) receives notice that he or she is
under administrative investigation. The policies will provide, at a minimum:
a. CPD members under investigation will not receive such notice of confidential
investigations, but will receive notice prior to being formally interviewed by
COPA, BIA, or an Accountability Sergeant;
b. such notice will comport with due process and the law, and will describe the
nature of the complaint made against the involved member, and the involved
member’s rights, but will not contain any information that is part of a
confidential investigation; and
c. once a CPD member has been notified or otherwise becomes aware that he or
she is the subject of an administrative investigation, the CPD member will not
review the following documents and evidence related to an incident under
administrative investigation, until notified by BIA that he or she is permitted
to do so, or as may be required to testify as a witness in criminal or civil
proceedings:
i. any investigative files;
ii. any reports (except for reports about the incident authored by the CPD
member); or
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
125
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
iii. any other evidence, from any source, including body and dashboard
camera footage (except as permitted for purposes of completing incident
reports or other documentation).
431. A CPD member who reviews audio or video evidence for purposes of completing
an incident report will document in writing that he or she reviewed the evidence in each relevant
incident report.
432. Consistent with the applicable collective bargaining agreements, CPD will require
members to cooperate with administrative investigations, including appearing for an
administrative interview when requested by COPA, BIA, or an Accountability Sergeant and will
provide all requested documents and evidence under the CPD member’s custody and control.
433. If a criminal investigation of a CPD member’s conduct has commenced, COPA,
BIA, or the Accountability Sergeant will continue the administrative investigation, absent
specific circumstances that would jeopardize the criminal investigation. In such circumstances,
the determination to postpone the administrative investigation, along with the rationale for doing
so, will be documented by COPA, BIA or the district in writing.
C. Disciplinary Investigations
434. COPA, BIA, and the districts will conduct objective, comprehensive, and timely
investigations of complaints.
435. All investigative findings will be based on the appropriate standard of proof. This
standard will be clearly delineated in COPA and BIA policies, training, and procedures.
436. The City will ensure that the disciplinary histories of current and former CPD
members are reviewed prior to employment with COPA, or assignment within BIA or as an
Accountability Sergeant.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
126
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
437. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to overrule paragraph 1 of the Arbitrator’s
Award in City of Chicago v. Policemen’s Benevolent & Protective Assoc. of Illinois, Unit 156A
– Sergeants and Unit 156B – Lieutenants, Gr. Nos. SGTS 14-023 and LTS 14-004 (Aug. 21,
2015) (Roumell, Jr., Arb.), that OIG may investigate any alleged misconduct on the part of CPD
members.
1. Investigative Practices
a. Preliminary Investigations
438. Within 30 days of receiving an allegation:
a. COPA and BIA will assess the allegation to determine whether the
complainant has alleged potential misconduct; and
b. if potential misconduct is alleged, COPA, BIA, or the district will initiate a
preliminary investigation into the complaint.
439. Preliminary investigations will take all reasonable steps to discover any and all
objective verifiable evidence relevant to the complaint or administrative notification through the
identification, retention, review, and analysis of all available evidence, including, but not limited
to: all time-sensitive evidence, audio and video evidence, physical evidence, arrest reports,
photographic evidence, GPS records, computer data, and witness interviews. All reasonable steps
will be taken to preserve relevant evidence identified during the preliminary investigation.
440. Allegations of misconduct based on verbal abuse will be preliminarily
investigated to determine whether it is appropriate to continue the investigation. Anonymously
submitted misconduct allegations will be preliminarily investigated to determine whether it is
appropriate to continue the investigation, in accordance with the applicable collective bargaining
agreements in effect at the time of the allegation is made.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
127
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
441. A signed complainant affidavit will not be required to conduct a preliminary
investigation.
442. The City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that, within 30 days of receiving a
complaint, COPA, BIA, and Accountability Sergeants initiate and make reasonable attempts to
secure a signed complainant affidavit, including in-person visits, phone calls, and other methods.
Such attempts will reasonably accommodate the complainant’s disability status, language
proficiency, and incarceration status.
a. If COPA, BIA, or the Accountability Sergeant is unable to obtain a signed
complainant affidavit despite having made reasonable attempts to do so,
COPA or BIA (for investigations conducted by both BIA and Accountability
Sergeants) will assess whether the evidence collected in the preliminary
investigation is sufficient to continue the investigation.
b. If the preliminary investigation reveals objective verifiable evidence
suggesting it is necessary and appropriate for the investigation to continue,
BIA (for investigations conducted by BIA and Accountability Sergeants) will
seek written approval for an override affidavit executed by the Chief
Administrator of COPA, and COPA (for investigations conducted by COPA)
will seek written approval for an override affidavit executed by the Chief of
BIA.
c. The Chief Administrator of COPA or the Chief of BIA will provide an
override affidavit if there is objective verifiable evidence suggesting it is
necessary and appropriate, and in the interests of justice, for the investigation
to continue.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
128
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
b. Misconduct Investigations
443. In the course of conducting thorough and complete misconduct investigations,
COPA, BIA, and the districts will:
a. take all reasonable steps to promptly identify, collect, and consider all relevant
circumstantial, direct, and physical evidence, including officer-recorded audio
or video taken with body-worn cameras or other recording devices;
b. take all reasonable steps to locate and interview all witnesses as soon as
feasible, including non-CPD member witnesses, and attempt to interview any
complainant or witness in-person at a time and place that is convenient and
accessible for the complainant or witness, when feasible;
c. determine whether there are any other open administrative investigations
involving the same involved member, and monitor or combine the
investigation(s), as appropriate;
d. audio record non-CPD member interviews subject to the interviewee’s
consent, or promptly prepare summaries of interviews when the interview is
not recorded;
e. take all reasonable steps to identify the involved and witness CPD member(s)
if the complainant was unable do so;
f. determine if there may have been additional misconduct beyond that initially
alleged. COPA, BIA, or the district will take all reasonable steps to ensure that
such identified misconduct is fully and fairly documented, classified, and
investigated;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
129
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
g. as applicable, consider a CPD member’s behavior based on the available
training records and disciplinary history, including complaints in which
allegations were not sustained, as permitted by law and any applicable
collective bargaining agreement; and
h. identify and take into account known relevant evidence gathered in parallel
criminal investigation or criminal or civil litigation, if available.
444. When conducting an administrative interview of any CPD member, COPA, BIA,
and the districts will:
a. ask the identity of other persons with whom he or she has communicated
regarding the incident in question, and the date, time, place, and content of
such communication, subject to any evidentiary privilege recognized under
Illinois or federal law;
b. ask whether he or she has reviewed any audio or video footage of the incident
in question, and, if so, the date, time, and place the video or audio was
reviewed;
c. ask whether he or she is aware of any media or social media coverage of the
incident in question, and, if so, the content and source of such known media
coverage;
d. note on the record of the interview anytime the CPD member seeks or obtains
information from his or her legal or union representative, as well as the length
of any “off the record” discussion between the CPD member and his or her
legal or union representative and ensure that the CPD member’s counsel or
representative does nothing to disrupt or interfere with the interview;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
130
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
e. document, and make part of the investigative file, all requests made on behalf
of a CPD member to reschedule an interview; and
f. audio record all CPD member in-person interviews.
445. When assessing credibility, COPA, BIA, and the districts will:
a. make credibility determinations of statements made by complainants,
involved CPD members, and witnesses based on independent, unbiased, and
credible evidence, taking into account any known record or final
determination of deception or untruthfulness in legal proceedings,
administrative investigations, or other investigations; and
b. critically evaluate all statements, like any other evidence, giving no automatic
preference to, or discounting, any statement solely due to its source, including
statements made by CPD members.
446. For each allegation associated with a misconduct investigation, COPA, BIA, or
the districts will explicitly identify and recommend one of the following findings:
a. “Sustained,” where it is determined the allegation is supported by a
preponderance of the evidence;
b. “Not Sustained,” where it is determined there is insufficient evidence to prove
the allegations by a preponderance of the evidence;
c. “Unfounded,” where it is determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that
an allegation is false or not factual; or
d. “Exonerated,” where it is determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that
the conduct described in the allegation occurred but is lawful and proper.
447. COPA, BIA, and the districts will ensure that investigators do not:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
131
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. ask leading questions that suggest legal justifications for the CPD member’s
conduct during interviews of witnesses, complainants, or the involved CPD
member;
b. make statements that could discourage a CPD member or non-CPD member
witness from providing a full account of the specific allegations;
c. close an administrative investigation solely because of findings in a related
criminal proceedings;
d. consider findings in a related criminal investigation to solely determine
whether a CPD member engaged in misconduct;
e. disregard a witness’s statement solely because the witness has some
connection to either the complainant or the CPD member or because the
witness or complainant has a criminal history; or
f. close an investigation solely because the complainant seeks to withdraw the
complaint or is unavailable, unwilling, or unable to cooperate with an
administrative investigation. If the complainant is unable or unwilling to
provide information beyond the initial complaint, the administrative
investigation will continue based on the available evidence in accordance with
this Agreement, applicable law, and any applicable collective bargaining
agreements.
448. The City, COPA, and CPD recognize the negative impact of actual bias or the
appearance of bias on the legitimacy of administrative investigations. For that reason, conflicts
of interest in administrative investigations will be identified and prohibited. The City, COPA,
and CPD will ensure the following:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
132
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. COPA, BIA, and district personnel will not be assigned to conduct any
investigation that could create a conflict of interest;
b. an investigation may not be conducted by any supervisor or CPD member
who allegedly authorized, engaged in conduct that led to, witnessed, or
otherwise allegedly participated in the incident giving rise to the complaint, or
who has a conflict of interest as defined by CPD policy or this Agreement. No
such person may participate in making any disciplinary recommendations
with respect to the investigation;
c. no CPD member who has an external business relationship or close personal
relationship with an involved CPD member or witness in an administrative
investigation will conduct or review the administrative investigation. No such
person may participate in making any disciplinary recommendations with
respect to the misconduct investigation including in the determination of any
applicable grievance or appeal arising from any discipline; and
d. no CPD member will participate in making any disciplinary decisions or
recommendations with respect to any person to whom he or she directly
reports to in his or her chain of command. In cases where CPD is unable to
meet this requirement, the investigation must be transferred to OIG.
449. The City will ensure that COPA arrives at the investigative findings and
recommendations within 180 days of the initiation of the investigation. Any request for an
extension of time must be approved in writing by the Chief Administrator of COPA, or his or her
designee, who must provide a short explanation of the reason(s) for granting or denying the
extension.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
133
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
450. The City and CPD will ensure that BIA arrives at the investigative findings and
recommendations within 180 days of the initiation of the investigation. Any request for an
extension of time must be approved in writing by the Chief of BIA or his or her designee.
451. The City and CPD will ensure that the districts arrive at the investigative findings
and recommendations within 90 days of the initiation of an investigation. Any request for an
extension of time must be approved in writing by the appropriate District Commander.
452. The City will ensure that if COPA does not arrive at the investigative findings and
recommendations within 180 days, the Chief Administrator of COPA, or his or her designee, will
notify, within five days after the end of the 180-day period, the Mayor or his or her designee, the
Superintendent, the Chairman of the City Council Committee on Public Safety, the complainant
or his or her representative, and the involved CPD member, or his or her counsel (unless such
notification would compromise the integrity of the investigation). Such notification will include
the reasons the administrative investigation has not concluded within 180 days. COPA will
update such notice every 180 days until the administrative investigation is completed.
453. CPD will ensure that if BIA does not arrive at the investigative findings and
recommendations within 180 days, or an Accountability Sergeant does not arrive at the
investigative findings and recommendations within 90 days, BIA will notify, within five days of
the end of the designated timeframe, the complainant or complainant representative, and the
involved CPD member, or his or her counsel (unless such notification would compromise the
integrity of the investigation). Such notification will include the reasons for the inability to
complete the administrative investigation within the designated timeframe. BIA or the
Accountability Sergeant will update such notice every 90 days until the administrative
investigation is completed.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
134
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
454. The City and CPD will undertake best efforts to ensure that the identities of
complainants are not revealed to the involved CPD member prior to the CPD member’s
interrogation.
455. The City, CPD, and COPA will require that COPA and BIA supervisors regularly
communicate with the investigators under their supervision, including Accountability Sergeants,
to evaluate the progress of administrative investigations.
456. The City and CPD will undertake best efforts to ensure that all complaints,
including anonymous complaints, can be the subject of a misconduct investigation.
457. Within 120 days of the Effective Date, CPD and COPA will each review and
revise its policies regarding preliminary investigations, including preliminary investigations of
anonymous complaints, and the process for seeking an override affidavit in the absence of a
signed complainant affidavit.
458. Within 120 days of the Effective Date, CPD and COPA will each adopt or review
and, to the extent necessary, revise its policy establishing investigative timelines, benchmarks,
and goals by which the progress of investigations will be measured.
459. Within 120 days of the Effective Date, the City, CPD, and COPA will each
develop a policy establishing procedures for COPA, BIA, and Accountability Sergeant’s review
and consideration of evidence from civil and criminal litigation.
460. The City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that if CPD, COPA, or the OIG requests
the Superintendent’s authorization to open an investigation concerning incidents that allegedly
occurred more than five years before the date that COPA, CPD, or the OIG became aware of the
allegations, the Superintendent will respond within 30 days.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
135
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
461. The City and CPD will ensure that BIA regularly conducts proactive
investigations and integrity tests.
462. The City and CPD will ensure there are regularly conducted satisfaction surveys
relating to the complaint intake and investigation processes. The City and CPD will evaluate
trends and training opportunities identified as a result of information received from such quality
control surveys.
463. If at any time during the intake or investigation of a complaint, COPA, BIA, or
Accountability Sergeants find evidence indicating criminal conduct by any CPD member, the
Chief Administrator of COPA or Chief of BIA will refer the investigation to the appropriate
prosecuting agency.
464. The City will continue to provide the Chief Administrator of COPA the discretion
to direct COPA to review and investigate the facts of individual civil lawsuits and criminal
proceedings involving alleged misconduct in order to identify and investigate incidents of
misconduct.
465. The City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that CPD and COPA maintain thorough
and complete administrative investigative files. Such administrative investigative files will
include:
a. documentation of all evidence that was gathered, including names, phone
numbers, and addresses of witnesses to the alleged misconduct. In situations
in which there are no known witnesses, the file will specifically state this fact.
In situations in which witnesses were present but circumstances prevented the
investigator from collecting information from those witnesses, the
investigative file will state the reasons why. The investigative file also will
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
136
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
include all available identifying information for anyone who refuses to
provide a statement;
b. documentation of each interview conducted and the recording of those
interviews, if available;
c. the names of all CPD members who have been identified as witnesses to the
alleged misconduct;
d. COPA’s, BIA’s, or the district’s narrative description and evaluation of the
alleged misconduct, based on its review of the evidence gathered, including a
determination of whether the CPD member’s actions appear to be within CPD
policy, procedure, regulations, orders, or other standards of conduct required
of CPD members;
e. in cases where material inconsistencies exist between complainant, CPD
member, and witness statements, explicit identification of the inconsistencies,
including a description of the evidence reviewed and written credibility
findings;
f. if a CPD member deployed a weapon, documentation of whether the CPD
member’s certification and training for the weapon were current;
g. all CPD member original statements, as well as any amendments or
clarifications to the original statement, and any subsequent statements; and
h. an explicit identification of each allegation and the recommended finding for
each allegation of misconduct in an investigation.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
137
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
466. Investigators will consider all original statements, and any subsequent statements,
including amended or modified statements, for purposes of determining whether a CPD member
willfully made a false statement about a fact material to the incident under investigation.
2. Officer-Involved Shootings and Deaths
467. In addition to the general investigative requirements established in this
Agreement, with respect to the investigation of officer-involved shootings and deaths, the City
and CPD will ensure that:
a. COPA investigators be provided the opportunity to participate in the
preliminary assessment during the immediate aftermath of an officer-involved
shooting or death to the same extent as any CPD member or any other law
enforcement agency investigating the incident;
b. the Chief Administrator of COPA, or his or her designee, is present for the
first viewing by CPD of available video or audio material related to the
incident and when any audio or video material is collected and preserved at or
near the scene from CPD or third-party surveillance systems.
i. the requirements of subparagraph (b), above, will not apply if:
(1) the Chief Administrator of COPA, or his or her designee, has been
informed of the incident and is not available; and
(2) COPA is not on scene and there is a public safety need to review or
listen to certain available audio or video prior to the COPA arrival
on scene.
c. there is written documentation identifying each CPD member who viewed
video evidence or listened to audio evidence at the scene;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
138
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
d. within 30 days of the Effective Date, CPD issues a policy providing that:
i. involved and witness CPD members do not discuss the facts relating to the
incident with any witness until interviewed by COPA, except to the extent
necessary to ensure public safety, as instructed by counsel in relation to
civil or criminal proceedings, or participating in CPD officer wellness
programs;
ii. COPA may extend the prohibition on discussion to the extent necessary to
preserve the integrity of the investigation; and
iii. in no event may this prohibition extend beyond the final disciplinary
decision, if any.
e. involved and witness CPD members will be separated, transported separately
from the scene, and monitored to avoid contact or communications relating to
the incident until released by the responding supervisor at or above the rank of
Commander ;
f. administrative interviews of involved and witness CPD members will be audio
recorded and, where possible, video recorded, with COPA investigators
present, except that a member may speak with his or her attorney or union
representative in private; and
g. investigators will not delay interviewing involved and witness CPD members,
and will conduct such interviews as soon as feasible, consistent with any
applicable collective bargaining agreement. Investigators will document, and
make part of the administrative investigative file, all requests made on behalf
of involved or witness CPD members to reschedule an interview.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
139
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
468. In addition to the investigative requirements set forth in this Agreement, with
respect to officer-involved shootings and officer-involved deaths, the City and CPD will ensure
that CPD members act in a manner that is consistent with CPD’s commitment to the principle of
the sanctity of life, including the prompt screening or covering of human remains and, following
timely evidence collection procedures, removal of human remains.
469. Criminal investigations into the actions of any CPD member relating to any
“officer-involved death” will comply with the Police and Community Relations Improvement
Act, 50 ILCS 727/1-1 et seq. (“PCRIA”). The City will use best efforts to ensure that a “law
enforcement agency,” as that term is defined under PCRIA, will conduct such investigations. The
“law enforcement agency” conducting criminal investigations into the actions of any CPD
member relating to any “officer-involved death” will have substantial experience and expertise in
criminal homicide investigations.
3. Accountability Sergeants
470. OAG acknowledges that, in many districts, CPD has designated Accountability
Sergeants whose responsibilities include receiving, processing, and investigating complaints
made against CPD members, which are referred to the districts by BIA. Within 120 days of the
Effective Date, CPD will develop a policy outlining the responsibilities of Accountability
Sergeants, their respective Commanders, and the BIA Lieutenants responsible for supervising the
Accountability Sergeant’s investigations (“BIA Lieutenants”). The policy will provide, among
other things, a process by which:
a. within 72 hours of receiving a complaint from BIA for investigation, an
immediate supervisor will be provided a summary of the complaint allegations
concerning the involved CPD member;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
140
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
b. within seven days of the final disciplinary decision, the Commander and an
immediate supervisor will be provided with the investigative findings,
recommended discipline or corrective action, if any; and
c. an immediate supervisor of the involved CPD member and the Accountability
Sergeant will meet with the involved CPD member regarding the investigative
findings, recommended discipline or corrective action, if any, unless the CPD
member declines to meet.
471. CPD will require that:
a. investigations completed by Accountability Sergeants are held to the same
investigative standards as those completed by BIA;
b. beginning in 2020, and by January 31, 2022, each District Commander
designates at least two Accountability Sergeants who will report to the District
Commander, and whose primary responsibility is receiving, processing, and
investigating complaints against CPD members;
c. before a Sergeant is designated an Accountability Sergeant, his or her name
will be provided by his or her District Commander to BIA for BIA’s review;
d. each Accountability Sergeant is provided with the name of and contact
information for the BIA Lieutenant responsible for reviewing the
Accountability Sergeant’s work;
e. BIA Lieutenants provide regular case-related and overall performance
feedback to each of the Accountability Sergeants and his or her respective
District Commander;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
141
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
f. BIA Lieutenants review and approve all of the Accountability Sergeant’s
proposed investigative findings and disciplinary recommendations;
g. all Accountability Sergeants and BIA Lieutenants have access to the PRS or
any system replacing the PRS;
h. all Accountability Sergeants have access to BIA policies, directives, protocols,
and training materials; and
i. all Accountability Sergeants receive the initial and in-service training
provided to BIA investigators as provided for in this Agreement.
4. Supervisory Review and Analysis of Investigations
472. Supervisory reviews of investigations will be conducted as follows:
a. Accountability Sergeants will forward the administrative investigative file
through his or her chain of command to the BIA Lieutenant:
i. the Accountability Sergeant’s chain of command will ensure that the
proposed investigative findings and recommendations are complete, meet
the requirements of law, CPD policy, and this Agreement, and that
findings are supported by the appropriate standard of proof;
ii. BIA Lieutenants will review the proposed investigative findings and
recommendations for accuracy and completeness, and will order
additional investigation when it appears that there is additional relevant
evidence that may assist in resolving inconsistencies or improving the
reliability or credibility of the findings; and
iii. whenever a higher ranking officer orders additional investigation, it will
be documented in writing.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
142
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
b. all investigations conducted by COPA or BIA, once complete, will be
forwarded through the investigator’s chain of supervision/command to the
Chief Administrator of COPA or the Chief of BIA, respectively:
i. COPA and BIA will each ensure that their respective administrative
investigative files are complete, meet the requirements of law, COPA and
CPD policy, and this Agreement; and that findings are supported by the
appropriate standard of proof;
ii. the Chief Administrator or the Chief of BIA, or his or her designee, will
order additional investigation when it appears that there is additional
relevant evidence that may assist in resolving inconsistencies or improving
the reliability or credibility of the findings; and
iii. whenever COPA or BIA orders additional investigation, the request and
resulting investigation will be documented in writing.
473. The City and CPD will ensure that interfering with an administrative
investigation, including being untruthful in an investigation into misconduct or colluding with
other individuals to undermine such an investigation, or intentionally withholding requested
evidence or information from an investigator, will result in disciplinary action and/or criminal
prosecution based on the seriousness of the conduct.
474. COPA and CPD will review and revise, as necessary, the policies governing
COPA and CPD to ensure the processes for prevention of CPD member collusion and witness
contamination comply with the terms of this Agreement.
475. The City and CPD will ensure that any command channel review conducted is
complete within 30 days. Within 30 days of the Effective Date, CPD may draft a policy that
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
143
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
provides, for the most serious administrative investigations, the circumstances under which up to
45 days will be provided for command channel review. The draft policy will be provided to the
Monitor for review and approval.
5. Investigation Findings and Recommendations
476. When COPA, BIA, or the investigating district has arrived at the investigative
findings and recommendations, it will promptly finalize a summary report (“Administrative
Summary Report”). The Administrative Summary Report will include:
a. a description of the CPD members and individuals involved in the alleged
misconduct;
b. the date, time, and location of the alleged misconduct;
c. a description of the allegations and applicable policies;
d. a narrative summary of the alleged misconduct;
e. a narrative summary of the investigation; and
f. the investigating body’s findings and conclusions for each allegation of
misconduct, including any discipline recommended.
477. For all misconduct investigations, BIA or COPA will publish the Administrative
Summary Report within 60 days of the final disciplinary decision.
478. Within 60 days of the final disposition, the City will publish: the charges filed and
the discipline recommended; the written decision(s), if any, related to the final disposition; and
the discipline imposed. When available, the City will publish the date on which the discipline is
scheduled to be imposed.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
144
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
479. Information contained in the Administrative Summary Report that is legally
exempt from disclosure for privacy or other purposes will be redacted prior to electronic
publication.
480. When an allegation of misconduct contains multiple separate potential policy
violations, all applicable violations will be identified and investigated. Exoneration for the most
serious allegations of misconduct will not preclude the recommendation of discipline, training, or
other corrective measures for less serious misconduct stemming from the same set of allegations.
481. As soon as feasible, but by no later than January 2020, upon arriving at the final
disciplinary decision, CPD and COPA will ensure that the Administrative Summary Report is
provided to the involved CPD member and the Department. CPD will ensure that the
Administrative Summary Report is provided to the involved CPD member’s District or Unit
Commander and immediate supervisor.
D. Case Management System
482. The CMS will have the following capacities:
a. maintain accurate and reliable data regarding the number, nature, and status of
all complaints and administrative notifications, from the intake process to
final disposition;
b. identify the status of administrative investigations;
c. identify caseloads for investigators; and
d. maintain all documents and investigative materials—including audio and
video—in a digital format, accessible via the CMS.
483. COPA, BIA, and the Accountability Sergeants will have access to the CMS as
necessary to undertake their respective duties.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
145
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
484. Administrative investigative files will be electronically preserved within the
CMS.
485. The City and CPD will undertake best efforts to ensure that all administrative
investigation files, disciplinary history card entries, COPA and BIA disciplinary records, and any
other disciplinary record or summary of such record, are retained electronically, and indefinitely,
for purposes of historical trend analysis, non-disciplinary EIS, and public transparency.
486. For each complaint, the CMS will separately track, and have capacity to conduct
searches and generate reports sufficient to identify and analyze trends relating to, at a minimum,
the following:
a. allegations of discriminatory policing based on an individual’s membership or
perceived membership in an identifiable group, based upon, but not limited to:
race, physical or mental disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation,
religion, and age;
b. allegations of unlawful stop, search, citation, or arrest practices;
c. allegations of excessive force;
d. allegations of misconduct arising during an interaction with individuals in
crisis;
e. allegations of retaliation against non-CPD members;
f. allegations of conduct alleged to have occurred in retaliation for engaging in
First Amendment protected activities, such as lawful demonstrations,
protected speech, observing or filming police activity, or criticizing an officer
or the officer’s conduct;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
146
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
g. allegations of officer-involved gender-based violence, domestic violence, or
sexual misconduct;
h. allegations of CPD member substance and/or alcohol abuse; and
i. the self-reported demographic information of complainants, including race,
physical or mental disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation,
religion, and age.
E. Community Mediation of Complaints
487. Mediation can be a valuable tool for expediting the resolution of complaints,
building trust between community members and police, and fostering mutual respect.
488. In order to develop a new mediation policy governing the resolution of
disciplinary actions by the agreement of the CPD member and non-CPD member complainant,
the City will solicit public input, through community engagement efforts, regarding the methods
by which mediation will most effectively build trust between community members and police
and foster mutual respect.
489. The City will ensure that within 365 days of the Effective Date, COPA and BIA
have developed parallel policies regarding the mediation of misconduct complaints by non-CPD
members. The policies will govern mediation of misconduct complaints involving non-CPD
member complainants. The policies will specify, at a minimum, (a) the criteria for determining
incidents eligible for resolution through mediation; (b) the goals of mediation, including
efficiency, transparency, procedural justice, restorative justice, and strengthening public trust; (c)
the steps in the mediation process; and (d) methods of communication with complainants
regarding the mediation process and the opportunity to participate. Items (a) through (d) above
will be consistent between the CPD and COPA mediation policies.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
147
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
F. Final Disciplinary Decision
490. COPA and CPD will ensure that the recommended level of discipline for findings
is consistently applied in a fair, thorough, and timely fashion, based on the nature of the
misconduct. COPA and CPD will also ensure that mitigating and aggravating factors are
identified, consistently applied, and documented.
491. The City, COPA, and CPD will use best efforts to ensure that the level of
discipline recommended for sustained findings is applied consistently across CPD districts and
without regard for the race of the complainant or the race of the involved CPD member.
492. All disciplinary decisions and discipline imposed will be documented in writing,
maintained in the administrative investigative file and the CPD member’s disciplinary history,
and reported within the CMS consistent with CPD policy and this Agreement.
493. Each sustained finding contained within a CPD member’s disciplinary history will
be considered for the purposes of recommending discipline for a subsequent sustained finding
for a period of up to five years after the date of the incident or the date on which the violation is
discovered, whichever is later.
494. The City, CPD, and COPA will ensure that findings of “Sustained – Violation
Noted, No Disciplinary Action”:
a. may not be used in any investigation in which the conduct resulted in injury to
any person; and
b. will only be used for investigations that warrant a sustained finding, but were
a result of unintentional violations of policy or law.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
148
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
495. CPD will provide the required notice regarding disciplinary matters to the Illinois
Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board, including when an officer resigns while a
misconduct investigation or disciplinary charges are pending.
496. The failure to complete an administrative investigation within the timeframes set
forth in this Agreement will not invalidate, impair, or otherwise negatively impact CPD’s ability
to issue discipline for sustained findings.
G. Staffing and Equipment Needs
497. OAG acknowledges that the City has spent considerable time and resources to
create and staff COPA and the Deputy PSIG.
498. The City, CPD, and COPA will continue to build on these critical efforts by
ensuring that BIA, COPA, the Police Board, and the Deputy PSIG have sufficient funding and an
adequate number of qualified staff to fulfill their respective missions as required by law, each
entity’s policies, and this Agreement.
499. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, COPA, the Deputy PSIG, and BIA will
create separate staffing and equipment-needs plans. Such plans will include analyses setting forth
the basis for the plans’ staffing requirements and equipment needs assessments.
500. On an annual basis, COPA, the Deputy PSIG, and BIA will review and revise, if
needed, each entity’s respective staffing and equipment-needs plans.
501. BIA’s staffing and equipment-needs plans will include the investigation staffing
and equipment needs of the districts.
502. Within 60 days of the Effective Date, the City will propose a permanent method
of selecting the Chief Administrator of COPA. In creating the permanent selection method for
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
149
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
COPA’s Chief Administrator, the City will consider the views and recommendations of
community stakeholders.
H. Training
503. Within 180 days of being assigned to BIA or being hired by COPA, all new BIA
personnel and COPA employees will receive initial on-boarding training that is adequate in
quality, quantity, scope, and type. Within 120 days of the Effective Date, COPA and BIA will
verify that all existing personnel received training that is consistent with this Agreement.
504. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, COPA and BIA will begin providing all
investigation staff members with at least eight hours of annual, comprehensive, in-service
training.
505. The initial and annual in-service training for COPA and BIA investigators will
include instruction in:
a. how to properly handle complaint intake, and the consequences for failing to
take complaints;
b. best practices in procedural justice, including techniques for communicating
with complainants and members of the public;
c. the collection of objective verifiable evidence;
d. the process for seeking an override affidavit in the absence of a signed
complainant affidavit;
e. for COPA investigators, techniques for conducting impartial investigations of
domestic violence and sexual misconduct;
f. for BIA investigators, techniques for conducting impartial investigations of
sexual assault;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
150
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
g. investigative skills, including proper interrogation and interview techniques,
gathering and objectively analyzing evidence, and data and case management;
h. the challenges of law enforcement administrative investigations, including
identifying alleged misconduct that is not clearly stated in the complaint or
that becomes apparent during the investigation;
i. properly weighing the credibility of witnesses against CPD members;
j. using objective evidence to identify and resolve inconsistent statements;
k. implicit bias;
l. the proper application of the relevant standards of proof;
m. relevant COPA and CPD rules, policies, and protocols including the
requirements of this Agreement;
n. relevant state and federal law;
o. relevant CPD Rules of Conduct, including Rules 14, 21, and 22;
p. the CMS;
q. the applicable collective bargaining agreements; and
r. how to access and use the PRS or information available on the PRS.
506. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will begin providing training to all
CPD members on the terms of this Agreement and COPA’s and CPD’s revised or new policies
related to administrative investigations and discipline. To the extent appropriate and necessary
based upon a CPD member’s duties, and contact with members of the public and/or individuals
in custody, this training will include instruction on:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
151
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. identifying and reporting misconduct, the consequences for failing to report
misconduct, and the consequences for retaliating against a person for
reporting misconduct or participating in an investigation;
b. use of the City’s anonymous reporting website;
c. for CPD supervisors:
i. the proper initiation of the intake process, including providing COPA’s
contact information and the consequences for failing to initiate the intake
process; and
ii. techniques for turning the initiation of a complaint into a positive police-
community member interaction.
507. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, COPA and BIA will create separate initial
and in-service training plans.
I. Police Board
508. In order to function effectively, CPD’s accountability system must protect the due
process rights of involved CPD members. In order to build public trust and credibility, CPD must
provide opportunities for meaningful community engagement that extends beyond the complaint
process. The Police Board strives to play the important dual roles of protecting CPD members’
due process rights and providing a platform for regular community feedback. The City will
ensure that the Police Board has adequate resources, training, and institutional support to fulfill
its important duties.
509. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, the City will draft selection criteria for
Police Board members with the objective of identifying individuals who possess sufficient
experience, judgment, and impartiality to perform the duties of members of the Police Board.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
152
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Selection criteria may include prior work in law or law enforcement, and service with Chicago-
based community and non-profit organizations. The draft selection criteria will be published on
the Police Board’s website for a period of 30 days for public review and comment. Following the
30-day public review and comment period, the City will provide the draft criteria to OAG for
review and comment. The final selection criteria will be published and maintained on the Police
Board’s website. The City will ensure that the selection criteria are the basis for future selection
of Police Board members.
510. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, the Police Board will submit selection
criteria for Police Board hearing officers to the Monitor and OAG for review and comment. The
criteria will be drafted to help identify individuals who possess sufficient competence,
impartiality, and legal expertise to serve as hearing officers. The selection criteria will be
published on the Police Board’s website. The City and the Police Board will ensure that the
selection criteria are the basis for future selection of Police Board hearing officers.
511. In any disciplinary action requiring the vote of the Police Board, the City will
ensure:
a. a hearing officer will preside over the disciplinary proceedings; and
b. disciplinary hearings will be videotaped in their entirety.
512. Following any disciplinary action requiring the vote of the Police Board, the City
will ensure:
a. all Police Board members are required to watch and certify that they have
watched the videotape of the entire evidentiary hearing;
b. all Police Board members are provided copies of the complete record,
including demonstrative exhibits;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
153
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
c. hearing officers will prepare a written report that sets forth evidence
presented at the hearing: (i) in support of the charges filed; (ii) in defense or
mitigation; and (iii) in rebuttal, including evidence and aggravation, if any; the
hearing officer’s report will also include information relating to witness
credibility;
d. the Police Board may, at its discretion, ask a hearing officer to additionally
prepare a written report and recommendation that sets forth findings of fact
and conclusions of law, including any findings relating to witness credibility;
e. the parties before the Police Board will have 14 days to review the hearing
officer’s report, and recommendation, and file any written objections; and
f. all Police Board members will review de novo the hearing officer’s report and
any recommendation, and the parties’ written objections to the same.
513. As part of the Police Board proceedings, the parties to the Police Board case (the
Superintendent and the involved CPD member) will be given access to the CPD member’s
complete disciplinary file and will have the opportunity to move for entry into the record of
proceedings any relevant aspect of the CPD member’s disciplinary file, as permitted by law and
any applicable collective bargaining agreements.
514. All regular meetings convened by the Police Board that are open to the public will
be attended by the CPD Superintendent or his or her designee; the Chief Administrator of COPA
or his or her designee; the Deputy PSIG or his or her designee; and the Chief of BIA or his or her
designee.
515. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, the City will create a policy for collecting,
documenting, classifying, tracking, and responding to community input received during the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
154
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Police Board’s regular community meetings. The policy will outline the methods for: (a)
directing community input to the appropriate responding entity, agency, or office; and (b)
documenting and making public, all responses to community input.
516. The Police Board will make best efforts to streamline discovery efforts in all
pending proceedings.
517. Within 180 days of the Effective Date, Police Board members and hearing
officers will receive initial and annual training that is adequate in quality, quantity, scope, and
type and will cover, at minimum, the following topics:
a. constitutional and other relevant law on police-citizen encounters, including
law on the use of force and stops, searches, and arrests;
b. police tactics;
c. investigations of police conduct;
d. impartial policing;
e. policing individuals in crisis;
f. CPD policies, procedures, and disciplinary rules;
g. procedural justice; and
h. community outreach.
518. The trainings will be provided by sources both inside and outside of CPD, as
needed, to provide high quality training on investigative techniques, and CPD policies,
procedures, and disciplinary rules.
519. Within 90 days of the Effective Date, the City will create a training policy for
Police Board members and hearing officers.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
155
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
520. With regard to the promulgation or adoption of CPD rules and regulations, the
Police Board’s authority will be limited to issuing policy recommendations in the manner set
forth in this Agreement.
J. Transparency and Trend Analysis
521. The City, CPD, and COPA recognize the importance of transparency to
improving CPD-community relations, and the City, CPD, and COPA have taken important steps
to increase transparency about their operations, including how they conduct investigations into
CPD member misconduct. The City, CPD, and COPA will continue to take steps to increase
transparency, including the implementation of the requirements set forth below.
1. CPD Transparency and Annual Report
522. To the extent permissible by law, within 60 days of its implementation, each CPD
policy and directive, including those created pursuant to this Agreement, will be posted online
and otherwise made publicly available. Any exception will be limited to documents that must
remain confidential to protect public safety, and as approved by the Superintendent.
523. Within 180 days following the expiration of each calendar year of the term of this
Agreement, the City will produce and publish an annual report describing CPD activity during
the previous calendar year (“CPD Annual Report”). The purpose of the CPD Annual Report will
be to inform the public of the City’s law enforcement achievements and challenges, as well as
new programs and steps taken to address challenges and build on successes. The CPD Annual
Report will further provide information regarding the City’s implementation and status of this
Agreement. The CPD Annual Report will not include any specific information or data by law
that may not be disclosed. Subject to applicable law, the CPD Annual Report will provide data
and program updates analyzing:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
156
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. community engagement and problem-solving policing efforts, identifying
successes, challenges, and recommendations for future improvement;
b. stop, search, and arrest data and any analysis of that data that was undertaken;
c. use-of-force data and associated analyses;
d. CPD responses to requests for service from individuals in crisis;
e. initiatives that CPD has implemented for officer assistance and support;
f. recruitment efforts, challenges, and successes; and
g. in-service and supplemental recruit training.
524. CPD will regularly analyze the information it collects regarding reportable uses of
force to identify significant trends. CPD will include information about any such trends in the
CPD Annual Report.
525. Within 180 days following the expiration of each calendar year of the term of this
Agreement, the City will produce and publish an annual report describing certain legal activity
involving CPD during the previous calendar year (“CPD Annual Litigation Report”). The CPD
Annual Litigation Report will not include any specific information or data that may not be
disclosed pursuant to applicable law. Subject to applicable law, the CPD Annual Litigation
Report will address:
a. a list of civil lawsuits in which the plaintiff(s) seek(s) to hold the City
responsible for the conduct of one or more current or former CPD members
and information that either (i) the lawsuit was concluded by final order and all
opportunities for appellate review were exhausted, or (ii) any judgment was
satisfied during the prior calendar year. This list will include civil lawsuits
handled by the City’s Department of Law’s (“DOL’s”) Federal Civil Rights
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
157
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Division, as well as lawsuits handled by DOL’s Torts Division if the
complaint seeks relief associated with a vehicle pursuit, only.
b. for each case identified in (a) above, the following information will be
provided in spreadsheet or open-data format:
i. case name;
ii. case number;
iii. the date the trial court entered the final order;
iv. a list of the parties at the time the final order was entered;
v. the nature of the order (e.g., dismissal with prejudice, summary judgment
for plaintiff(s)/defendant(s), judgment of not liable, judgment of liable);
vi. the amount of the compensatory and punitive damages awarded (if
applicable); and
vii. the amount of attorney’s fees and costs awarded (if applicable).
c. a list of civil lawsuits in which the plaintiff(s) seek(s) to hold the City
responsible for the conduct of one or more current or former CPD members
and a settlement was reached (including approval by City Council, if
applicable) during the prior calendar year. This list will include civil lawsuits
handled by DOL’s Federal Civil Rights Division, as well as such lawsuits
handled by DOL’s Torts Division if the complaint seeks relief associated with
a vehicle pursuit, only.
d. for each case identified in (c) above, the following information will be
provided in spreadsheet or open-data format:
i. case name;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
158
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
ii. case number;
iii. a list of the parties at the time the case was settled;
iv. the amount of the settlement; and
v. the amount of settlement allocated to attorney’s fees and costs (if known).
e. the amount of attorney’s fees paid by the City during the prior calendar year to
outside counsel engaged to defend the City and/or one or more current or
former CPD members in civil lawsuits handled by DOL’s Federal Civil Rights
Division, as well as such lawsuits handled by DOL’s Tort’s Division if the
complaint seeks relief associated with a vehicle pursuit, only. This amount
will be presented in the aggregate.
f. for all individually named defendants in the cases identified in (a) and (c)
above, the status (e.g., pending with BIA/COPA/OIG or charges sustained,
not sustained, unfounded, or exonerated by BIA/COPA/OIG) of any
administrative investigation(s) by BIA, COPA, or OIG at the time the trial
court entered its final order or the settlement was reached.
g. the disposition of any felony criminal prosecutions of current or former CPD
members from the previous year.
h. the number of pending civil lawsuits that seek to hold the City responsible for
one or more current or former CPD members that the City is defending. This
number will include civil lawsuits handled by the Department of Law’s
Federal Civil Rights Division, as well as lawsuits handled by DOL’s Torts
Division if the complaint seeks relief associated with a vehicle only.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
159
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
526. As part of the CPD Annual Litigation Report, the City will analyze the data and
trends collected, and include a risk analysis and resulting recommendations.
2. BIA and COPATransparency and Reporting
527. By April 2020, CPD and COPA will electronically publish quarterly and annual
reports that will include, at a minimum, the following:
a. aggregate data on the classification of allegations, self-reported complainant
demographic information, and complaints received from anonymous or third
party complainants;
b. aggregate data on complaints received from the public, specified by district or
unit of assignment and subcategorized by classification of allegations;
c. aggregate data on the processing of investigations, including:
i. The average time from the receipt of the complaint by COPA, BIA, or the
district to the next or initial contact with the complainant or his or her
representative;
ii. the average time from the investigative findings and recommendations to
the final disciplinary decision;
iii. the average time from the investigative findings and recommendations to a
final disposition; and
iv. the number of investigations closed based on the absence of a complainant
affidavit, including the number of attempts (if any) to obtain an override
affidavit in the absence of a signed complainant affidavit;
d. aggregate data on the outcomes of administrative investigations, including the
number of sustained, not sustained, exonerated, and unfounded allegations;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
160
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
the number of sustained allegations resulting in a non-disciplinary outcome;
and the number resulting in disciplinary charges;
e. aggregate data on discipline, including the number of investigations resulting
in written reprimand, suspension, demotion, and termination;
f. aggregate data on grievance proceedings arising from misconduct
investigations, including: the number of cases grieved; the number of cases
that proceeded before the Police Board; the number of cases that proceeded to
arbitration; and the number of cases that were settled prior to a full evidentiary
hearing, whether before the Police Board or in arbitration;
g. aggregate data on outcomes of misconduct investigations by classification of
allegations, broken down by self-reported race, gender, and age of the
complainant and the CPD member;
h. aggregate data on (i) the number of CPD members who have been the subject
of more than two completed misconduct investigations in the previous 12
months, and (ii) the number of CPD members who have had more than one
sustained allegation of misconduct in the previous 12 months, including the
number of sustained allegations;
i. aggregate data on CPD members who have been the subject, in the previous
12 months, of more than two complaints in the following classifications of
allegations, regardless of the outcome of those complaint investigations:
i. allegations of discriminatory policing based on an individual’s
membership or perceived membership in an identifiable group, based
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
161
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
upon, but not limited to: race, physical or mental disability, gender, gender
identity, sexual orientation, religion, and age;
ii. allegations of excessive force; and
iii. allegations of unlawful stops, searches and arrests;
j. the disposition of misdemeanor criminal prosecutions of current CPD
members.
528. BIA’s quarterly and annual reports will include data reflecting investigations
conducted by the districts.
529. For non-disciplinary purposes, including historical trend analysis, CPD will track,
for each CPD member, for every misconduct investigation: the nature of allegations, the outcome
of the investigation, and the disposition of discipline.
530. Beginning in 2020, CPD will audit, on at least an annual basis, the investigation
and disciplinary process involving complaints investigated by BIA and the districts to ensure that
the investigations are conducted in accordance with BIA policies and this Agreement. The audits
will include completed investigations and the recommendations of discipline. CPD will make
public any of the audit findings, ensuring that any personally identifiable information is redacted.
531. OAG acknowledges that the City adopted a policy relating to the public release of
video footage capturing weapons discharges and incidents involving death or serious bodily
injury. Consistent with applicable law, the City will continue to ensure COPA publicly releases
such video footage pursuant to the June 2016 Video Release Policy for the City of Chicago. The
Video Release Policy will not supersede or otherwise limit the City’s legal obligations pursuant
to state and federal transparency laws, including the Illinois Freedom of Information Act, 5 ILCS
140/1 et seq.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
162
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
3. Police Board
532. On an annual basis, the Police Board will track and publish case-specific and
aggregate data about Police Board decisions. Such publications will contain and include, at
minimum, the following:
a. the date on which the investigating agency (COPA, BIA, district, or OIG)
received the complaint or notification for investigation;
b. the date of the Police Board hearing over which the hearing officer presided;
c. the disciplinary recommendations and/or decisions (where applicable) made
by COPA, BIA, the Superintendent, and the Police Board;
d. the average time between the filing of disciplinary charges with the Police
Board and the first day of hearing;
e. the average time between the filing of disciplinary charges with the Police
Board and the Police Board’s decision;
f. the average time between the date on which the investigating agency (COPA,
BIA, district, or OIG) received the complaint for investigation and the Police
Board’s decision;
g. the date of the alleged misconduct;
h. the average time between the date of the alleged misconduct giving rise to the
complaint or notification and the Police Board’s decision; and
i. whether any Police Board decision has been appealed to any state court and, if
so, the court’s final judgment.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
163
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
4. Deputy Inspector General for Public Safety
533. The Deputy PSIG will conduct periodic analysis and evaluations, and perform
audits and reviews as authorized by Municipal Code of Chicago § 2-56-230.
534. The Deputy PSIG’s audits and reviews will be conducted pursuant to the
Association of Inspectors General Principles and Standards for Offices of Inspector General.
535. Within 60 days of the Effective Date, the Deputy PSIG will develop policies for
regularly, and at least annually, conducting data-driven reviews and audits to measure the
effectiveness of the City and CPD’s accountability practices. These reviews and audits will be
designed to measure whether members of the community can readily make a complaint alleging
misconduct and whether such complaints are investigated and adjudicated consistently with CPD
policy, this Agreement, and the law. Reviews and audits will include:
a. analysis of the number of complaints received, the disposition of complaints
by complaint type, the timeliness and average length of administrative
investigations, and disciplinary actions taken;
b. analysis of complaint trends;
c. analysis of CPD’s enforcement of its Rule 14, Rule 21, and Rule 22;
d. analysis of the thoroughness of administrative investigations, and of the
justifications for terminating investigations before the investigative findings
and recommendations;
e. analysis of disciplinary grievance procedures and outcomes; and
f. analysis of complainant-involved mediations.
536. The Deputy PSIG will conduct reviews of individual closed COPA and CPD
administrative investigative files for thoroughness, fairness, and objectivity, and will make
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
164
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
recommendations based on those reviews, including the recommendation that an investigation be
reopened upon a finding of a deficiency that materially affects the outcome of the investigation.
537. The Deputy PSIG will have timely and full access to all information in the
possession or control of COPA, CPD, the Police Board, and any other City departments or
agencies in order to conduct any review or audit within the Deputy PSIG’s jurisdiction.
538. The Deputy PSIG will hire a full-time diversity and inclusion monitor, who will
have specific authority to review CPD actions for potential bias, including racial bias for any
topic within the Deputy PSIG’s statutory authority. The diversity and inclusion monitor will
regularly publish reports sharing his or her findings and analysis, at minimum, on an annual
basis, with the public, COPA, CPD, the Police Board, and the City.
539. The Deputy PSIG will provide all staff members with comprehensive initial on-
boarding training and annual in-service training. The Deputy PSIG will create initial and in-
service training plans and submit these plans to the Monitor and OAG for review and comment.
540. At least 60 days prior to publishing its annual audit plan, the Deputy PSIG will
provide the Monitor with a draft of its audit plan for review and comment.
541. The Deputy PSIG will exercise his or her discretionary and oversight
responsibilities without interference from any person, group, or organization, including CPD,
COPA, the Police Board, and City officials. Any person that knowingly interferes with the
Deputy PSIG’s performance of his or her duties will be subject to the penalties set forth in
Municipal Code of Chicago Sections 2-56-140, 145, 270.
K. CPD Policy Recommendations
542. At least quarterly, COPA, the Deputy PSIG, and the President of the Police
Board, or his or her designee, will meet to confer and share information regarding trends and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
165
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
analyses of data relating to CPD. They will jointly or separately provide any resulting
recommendations for changes in CPD policy or rules, in writing, to the Superintendent.
Thereafter:
a. the Superintendent will respond to any such recommendation within 60 days
of receipt;
b. the Superintendent’s response will include a description of the actions that the
Superintendent has taken or plans to take with respect to the issues raised in
the recommendations; and
c. all policy recommendations and responses to the same will be published on a
City website.
XI. DATA COLLECTION, ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT
A. Guiding Principles
543. Data can empower CPD to engage in the type of critical self-examination
essential to instilling and maintaining constitutional policing. CPD can leverage data to ensure
constitutional policing by: systematically collecting enough data to have a broad-based
understanding of officers’ interactions with the public; auditing the data to ensure it accurately
reflects those interactions; analyzing the data to identify trends or areas of concern; developing
tailored support and interventions to address behavior that is or may become problematic; and
assessing the effectiveness of attempts to modify officers’ behavior.
544. In addition to enhancing CPD’s capacity for internal accountability, CPD can use
data to promote accountability to the public by regularly publishing data it collects.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
166
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
B. Use of Force Data Collection, Review, and Auditing
545. CPD will collect and maintain the data and records necessary to accurately
evaluate its use of force practices and to facilitate transparency and accountability regarding
those practices.
546. CPD must collect, track, and maintain all available documents related to use of
force incidents, including:
a. TRRs, or any other similar form of documentation CPD may implement for
initial reporting of reportable use of force incidents;
b. TRR-Is, or any other similar form of documentation CPD may implement to
document supervisory investigation of reportable use of force incidents;
c. Tactical Response Reports – Review (“TRR-Rs”), or any other similar form of
documentation CPD may implement to document review or auditing of
reportable use of force incidents;
d. arrest reports, original case incident reports, and investigatory stop reports
associated with a reportable use of force incident;
e. administrative investigative files, including investigative materials generated,
collected, or received by BIA, or COPA, or any similar form of
documentation CPD may implement for misconduct allegations or civilian
complaints; and
f. all reasonably available documentation and materials relating to any
reportable use of force, in-custody injury or death, or misconduct allegation,
including body-worn, in-car, or known third-party camera recordings, and
statements, notes, or recordings from witness and officer interviews.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
167
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
547. The City will ensure that reasonably available documents related to reportable
uses of force that are or become subject to misconduct complaints or investigations are promptly
provided to the appropriate investigative entity (e.g., COPA, BIA). The City will ensure that any
reasonably available documents related to reportable uses of force subject to misconduct
complaints or investigations, except for open confidential investigations, are accessible in the
CMS the City is working to create, or in any similar electronic system, by 2020. Within seven
days of the receipt of a misconduct complaint or the initiation of an administrative investigation,
whichever occurs first, the City will identify any available reportable use of force documentation
associated with the incident and ensure such documentation is accessible via the CMS or similar
system. By 2020, whenever a reportable use of force incident becomes the subject of a
misconduct investigation, COPA will notify CPD via the CMS within three days of the initiation
of the investigation.
548. CPD must have an electronic system that accurately and reliably tracks all data
derived from reportable use of force incidents, including:
a. the response by CPD members during the incident, including the type(s) of
force used;
b. the date, time, location, and district of the incident;
c. whether a foot or vehicle pursuit occurred that is associated with the incident;
d. the actual or, if unavailable, perceived race, ethnicity, age, and gender of the
subject;
e. the name, watch, employee number, and unit and beat of assignment of any
CPD member(s) who used force;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
168
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
f. CPD units identified in the incident report as being on the scene of the use of
force incident;
g. whether the incident occurred during an officer-initiated contact or a call for
service;
h. the subject’s mental health or medical condition, use of drugs or alcohol,
ability to understand verbal commands, or disability, as perceived by the CPD
member(s) at the time force was used;
i. the subject’s actions that led to the CPD member’s use of force;
j. whether the CPD member perceived that the subject possessed a weapon and,
if so, what type(s);
k. whether the subject possessed a weapon and, if so, what type(s);
l. whether reportable force was used against a subject that was handcuffed or
otherwise in physical restraints;
m. any injuries sustained by CPD members;
n. any injuries sustained or alleged by the subject(s) and any medical treatment
that was offered or performed on the scene of the incident;
o. for each weapon discharged by an officer, including firearms, Tasers, and OC
Devices, the number of discharges per weapon; and
p. whether the subject was charged with an offense and, if so, which offense(s).
549. CPD will regularly review citywide and district-level data regarding reportable
uses of force to:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
169
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. assess the relative frequency and type of force used by CPD members against
persons in specific demographic categories, including race or ethnicity,
gender, age, or perceived or known disability status; and
b. identify and address any trends that warrant changes to policy, training,
tactics, equipment, or Department practice.
550. Prior to conducting the initial assessment required by Paragraph 549, CPD will
share its proposed methodology, including any proposed factors to be considered as part of the
assessment, with the Monitor for review and approval. The Monitor will approve CPD’s
proposed methodology provided that the Monitor determines that CPD’s methodology comports
with published, peer-reviewed methodologies and this Agreement.
551. A designated unit at the CPD headquarters level will routinely review and audit
documentation and information collected regarding each level 2 reportable use of force incident,
a representative sample of level 1 reportable use of force, and incidents involving accidental
firearms discharges and animal destructions with no human injuries to ensure:
a. CPD members completely and thoroughly reported the reason for the initial
stop, arrest, or other enforcement action, the type and amount of force used,
the subject’s actions or other circumstances necessitating the level of force
used, and all efforts to de-escalate the situation;
b. the district-level supervisory review, investigation, and policy compliance
determinations regarding the incident were thorough, complete, objective, and
consistent with CPD policy;
c. any tactical, equipment, or policy concerns are identified and, to the extent
necessary, addressed; and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
170
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
d. any patterns related to use of force incidents are identified and, to the extent
necessary, addressed.
552. CPD recently established a Force Review Unit (“FRU”) and tasked the FRU with
certain responsibilities described in the preceding paragraph. CPD will ensure that the FRU or
any other unit tasked with these responsibilities has sufficient resources to perform them. CPD
will ensure that the FRU or any other unit tasked with these responsibilities is staffed with CPD
members, whether sworn or civilian, with sufficient experience, rank, knowledge, and expertise
to: effectively analyze and assess CPD’s use of force practices and related reporting and review
procedures; conduct trend analysis based on use of force data; identify tactical, equipment,
training, or policy concerns based on analysis of use of force incidents and data; and develop
recommendations regarding modifications to tactics, equipment, training, or policy as necessary
to address identified practices or trends relating to the use of force.
553. CPD will conduct random audits of body-worn and in-car camera recordings of
incidents that involved civilian interactions to assess whether CPD officers are complying with
CPD policy. CPD will take corrective action to address identified instances where CPD officers
have not complied with CPD policy as permitted by law, and will identify any trends that
warrant changes to policy, training, tactics, equipment, or Department practice.
554. CPD will create a Force Review Board (“FRB”) to review, from a Department
improvement perspective: (a) any level 3 reportable use of force incident, except for accidental
firearms discharges and animal destructions with no human injuries, and (b) any reportable uses
of force by a CPD command staff member.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
171
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
555. For any reportable use of force incident subject to an ongoing investigation by
COPA, COPA will be exclusively responsible for recommending disciplinary action relating to
the incident. The purpose of FRB’s review will be to:
a. evaluate if actions by CPD members during the incident were tactically sound
and consistent with CPD training; and
b. if applicable, identify specific modifications to existing policy, training,
tactics, or equipment that could minimize the risk of deadly force incidents
occurring and the risk of harm to officers and the public.
556. The FRB will be chaired by the Superintendent, or his or her designee, and will
include, at a minimum, the Chief of the Bureau of Patrol, or his or her designee, and CPD
members at the rank of Deputy Chief, or above, who are responsible for overseeing policy
development, policy implementation, training, and misconduct investigations. CPD’s General
Counsel, or his or her designee, will also serve on the FRB.
557. The FRB will review each incident within its purview promptly, which will in no
event be more than 96 hours after the incident occurs. Within 30 days after its review of an
incident, the FRB will issue recommendations, if appropriate, to the Superintendent regarding
any need for additional training or modifications to policies, tactics, equipment, or department
practices. Upon review and approval by the Superintendent, or his or her designee, the FRB will
assign each approved recommendation to a specific CPD command staff member for
implementation. CPD will promptly implement each approved recommendation.
C. Publication of Data Regarding Reportable Uses of Force
558. Beginning within 180 days of the Effective Date, CPD will publish on at least a
monthly basis aggregated and incident-level data, excluding personal identifying information
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
172
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
(e.g., name, address, contact information), regarding reportable use of force incidents via a
publicly accessible, web-based data platform.
559. The publicly accessible, web-based data platform will enable visitors to:
a. identify where reportable uses of force occur through interactive maps
depicting incident frequencies at a citywide, district, neighborhood, and ward
level;
b. identify the frequency, in the aggregate and by type, of reportable uses of
force at the citywide, district, neighborhood, and ward level through graphs,
charts, and other data visualizations; and
c. review aggregate demographic information about the race, ethnicity, age, and
gender of persons subjected to reportable uses of force at the citywide, district,
neighborhood, and ward level through graphs, charts, and other data
visualizations.
D. Early Intervention System
560. CPD must collect and provide information to supervisors that enables them to
proactively identify at-risk behavior by officers under their command, and to provide
individualized interventions and support to address the at-risk behavior. CPD must provide
supervisors with an automated electronic system that provides this information and equips
supervisors to perform these duties.
561. The automated electronic system must be:
a. data-driven and developed with statistical methods and analytic techniques;
b. customizable to CPD’s particular needs;
c. adaptive as new information becomes available;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
173
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
d. capable of being audited and evaluated to improve accuracy; and
e. able to generate sufficient data that enables assessment of the effects, if any,
of support provided and interventions undertaken.
562. The automated electronic system must perform these primary functions:
a. using statistical methods to identify officers who are at elevated risk of
engaging in conduct leading to at-risk behavior;
b. identifying and facilitating support and interventions that prevent or reduce
the occurrence of the identified at-risk behavior;
c. providing supervisors with a dashboard of relevant information about
members under their direct command to facilitate appropriate supervisory
intervention and support; and
d. performing peer group analysis with comparative data to account for
differences in job assignments, and to identify group- and unit-level patterns
of activity.
563. A primary goal of the automated electronic system will be to facilitate early
identification of officers at elevated risk of being involved in certain types of events so that the
officers can receive tailored interventions intended to reduce such risk. The types of events
sought to be avoided could include, depending upon the feasibility of identifying these events
using statistical methods and analytic techniques, examples such as any instance in which a CPD
member is: directly involved in an excessive force incident; subject to a sustained finding in a
misconduct investigation; a defendant in a civil lawsuit resulting in an adverse judgment or
settlement; suspended more than five days; the subject of a recommendation of employment
termination by COPA, BIA, or the Superintendent; a direct participant in an officer-involved
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
174
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
shooting or death determined to be unjustified or out of policy by COPA, BIA, the
Superintendent, the Police Board, or a court of law; convicted of a crime; or subject to an
increased risk of suicide or alcohol and/or substance abuse.
564. The automated electronic system must include a computerized relational database
that will be used to collect, maintain, integrate, analyze, visualize, and retrieve data for each CPD
officer. The information collected and maintained must include but is not limited to:
a. all reportable uses of force;
b. all arrests by CPD personnel;
c. all injuries to and deaths of persons in CPD custody;
d. all injuries and deaths resulting from conduct by CPD personnel;
e. all vehicle pursuits and traffic collisions involving CPD equipment or
personnel;
f. all misconduct complaints and investigations involving CPD officers,
including the disposition of each allegation;
g. all civil or administrative claims initiated against the City or CPD, or CPD
officers for job-related conduct;
h. all criminal proceedings initiated against a CPD officer, which CPD will
require officers to report;
i. all instances in which CPD is notified that a court has made a negative
credibility determination regarding a CPD officer;
j. instances in which CPD learns through the Cook County State’s Attorney’s
Office that an affirmative finding was made during the course of a criminal
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
175
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
proceeding that a CPD member was untruthful, including any findings made
at suppression hearings;
k. all instances in which CPD learns through the Cook County State’s Attorney
Office, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of
Illinois, or other prosecutorial authority that prosecution was declined based in
whole or in part on concerns about a CPD officer’s credibility;
l. judicial proceedings where an officer is the subject of a restraining or
protective order, which CPD will require officers to report;
m. disciplinary history for all CPD members;
n. all non-disciplinary corrective action retained electronically;
o. all violations of CPD’s body-worn and in-car camera policies;
p. all awards and commendations received by CPD officers;
q. officer sick leave usage;
r. missed court appearances;
s. training history; and
t. rank, assignment, and transfer history.
565. CPD will collect and maintain all information reasonably necessary to identify
patterns of behavior that are indicative of a future instance of at-risk behavior. The automated
electronic system must employ specific criteria to identify officers who will be subject to an
intervention or targeted support. The criteria may be based on a single indicator, such as the
number of misconduct complaints against an officer, a combination of multiple indicators, or an
algorithmic scoring model. CPD will adjust the criteria as necessary based on data and
experience to ensure interventions and support are optimally targeted.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
176
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
566. CPD will ensure that all required information is entered into the automated
electronic system in a timely, accurate, and complete manner. All information captured within
the automated electronic system will be accessible in an organized manner that facilitates
identification of at-risk officer conduct.
567. CPD will require unit commanding officers to review the automated electronic
system data regarding all officers who are transferred to their command within 14 days of the
transfer. CPD will require supervisors to conduct monthly reviews of the automated electronic
system data regarding officers under their direct command. The purpose of these reviews will be
for supervisors to identify and address patterns of behavior by officers under their direct
command that are indicative of a future instance of at-risk behavior. CPD will also require
supervisors to review the automated electronic system data together with officers under their
direct command during the annual performance evaluation process.
568. The automated electronic system will employ push notifications and similar
mechanisms to alert supervisors when patterns of conduct indicative of a future instance of at-
risk behavior are identified. CPD will provide appropriate interventions and support in a timely
manner.
569. CPD will ensure than any CPD member required to receive counseling after being
identified through the automated electronic system has the opportunity to participate in an initial
counseling session within 14 days of the member being notified of the requirement.
570. CPD will ensure that command staff regularly use the automated electronic
system data to effectively manage CPD officers and supervisors across all ranks, watches, beats,
and districts.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
177
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
571. CPD will provide training to all officers, supervisors, and command staff
regarding the automated electronic system to ensure proper understanding and use of the system.
572. CPD will train all supervisors to use the automated electronic system as designed,
to interpret the outputs, to perform appropriate interventions and support, to address underlying
stressors to promote officer well-being, and to improve the performance of officers under their
direct command.
573. CPD will conduct annual audits of the automated electronic system. The audits
will:
a. assess the overall effectiveness of the automated electronic system and the
support and interventions prompted by the system;
b. assess whether and to what extent supervisors are completing monthly reviews
of the automated electronic system information regarding officers under their
direct command;
c. assess whether and to what extent CPD is providing interventions and support
in a timely manner;
d. assess whether the interventions and support provided are appropriate and
effective; and
e. identify any recommended changes to improve the effectiveness of the
automated electronic system.
574. CPD will provide timely and appropriate interventions and support to officers
identified through the automated electronic system. Interventions and support will be designed to
assist officers in avoiding and correcting at-risk behavior. All interventions and support will be
documented in the automated electronic system. CPD will review, evaluate, and document in the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
178
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
automated electronic system the progress and effectiveness of the intervention or support
strategy for each officer.
575. In seeking to provide improved support and wellness to its officers, CPD will seek
to identify which supports and interventions are most helpful to officers and develop support and
training based on CPD feedback and best practices. The types of support services offered to CPD
officers may include, but not be limited to: counseling; training; coaching and mentoring; and
additional supervision or monitoring.
576. CPD currently maintains a PRS, which is modeled on first-generation attempts by
other large departments to develop early intervention systems to identify and address at-risk
conduct by officers. CPD has partnered with the University of Chicago’s Crime Lab (“Crime
Lab”) to develop a next-generation EIS that will improve on early intervention systems
implemented in other jurisdictions.
577. CPD will maintain its partnership with the Crime Lab or another similarly
qualified service provider until such time as an EIS consistent with the requirements of this
Agreement has been implemented department-wide, and CPD has developed sufficient technical
competency to maintain and improve the EIS as necessary.
578. CPD will continue to solicit input and feedback from representatives of its
collective bargaining units during the development and implementation of the EIS.
579. Prior to beginning the phased implementation of the EIS, CPD will develop and
implement new or revised policies and procedures for using the EIS and, if applicable, the
updated PRS and information obtained from them. The policies and procedures will address data
storage, data retrieval, data analysis, reporting, pattern identification, supervisory use,
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
179
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
intervention and support options and procedures, documentation and audits, access to the system,
and confidentiality of personally identifiable information.
580. After the completion of the development of the EIS, CPD will implement the EIS
through a phased rollout that incorporates pilot testing to identify and address any technical or
design issues. CPD will begin phased implementation of the EIS within 18 months of the
Effective Date, and will complete full implementation of the EIS by no later than 24 months after
the Effective Date.
581. Prior to full implementation of the EIS, CPD will continue to use the PRS as well
as other existing tools and resources to identify patterns of conduct by officers that warrant
support and intervention. Following the development and implementation of the EIS, the
functions required of the automated electronic system described above may be performed by a
combination of the EIS and the PRS as long as all required functions are performed and
supervisors are using the system(s) as required by CPD policy. To the extent CPD continues
utilizing PRS to perform any of the functions required by this Agreement, CPD will update the
PRS to enhance the system’s effectiveness, usability, and accuracy by no later than January 1,
2020.
582. The City will ensure CPD has adequate funding to develop, implement, and
maintain the EIS and, if necessary, the updated PRS, including ongoing hardware and support
requirements and officer support services.
E. Data Systems Plan
583. Within 365 days of the Effective Date, CPD will conduct an assessment of CPD’s
current information collection mechanisms and data management technology to identify:
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
180
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
a. what data CPD currently collects and what additional data is required to be
collected to comply with this Agreement;
b. the manner of collection (e.g., electronic or paper);
c. the frequency with which each type of data is updated;
d. the quality control mechanisms in place, or the need for such mechanisms, to
ensure the accuracy of data collected;
e. what software applications or data systems CPD currently has and the extent
to which they are used or accessed by CPD members;
f. redundancies or inefficiencies among the applications and systems currently
in use; and
g. the extent to which the applications and systems currently in use interact with
one another effectively.
584. Within 90 days of completion of the assessment described in the preceding
paragraph, CPD will develop a plan, including a timeline for implementation, to prioritize and
address the needs identified to enhance CPD’s information collection mechanisms and data
management technology (“Data Systems Plan”). CPD will implement the Data Systems Plan in
accordance with the specified timeline for implementation.
585. CPD will continue to maintain an Information Systems Development Group
(“ISDG”). The ISDG will continue to be chaired by the Chief of the Bureau of Technical
Services or other high-ranking member of CPD’s command staff. The ISDG will also include, in
some capacity, personnel from various units of the Department that are responsible for
overseeing patrol field operations; conducting criminal investigation and processing juvenile
offenders; initiating and conducting investigations of organized crime; overseeing the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
181
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
administrative aspects of CPD; managing data, technology, and information systems;
coordinating and exercising supervision over disciplinary matters; administering training;
providing legal advice; developing and publishing department policies and procedures; and
overseeing and coordinating CPD’s budget and fiscal responsibilities. The ISDG will be
responsible for:
a. ensuring implementation of the Data Systems Plan;
b. ensuring CPD’s information collection mechanisms and data management
technologies are in the best long-term interests of the Department for
improving operations and management consistent with the terms of this
Agreement; and
c. recommending strategies to promote the development, sharing, and reporting
of relevant information to the Superintendent, the public, the FRB, COPA,
BIA, and OIG.
586. On an annual basis, to improve the accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of its data
collection, CPD will review and, as necessary, revise departmental forms relating to: use of
force, arrests, interactions with individuals in crisis, and the disciplinary process.
XII. IMPLEMENTATION, ENFORCEMENT, AND MONITORING
A. Independent Monitor
587. The Parties will jointly select an independent monitor who will assess and report
whether the requirements of this Agreement have been implemented, and whether
implementation is resulting in constitutional policing and increased community trust of CPD.
The independent monitor will be assisted by a team of individuals (collectively, “Monitor”) with
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
182
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
the knowledge, skills, and expertise necessary to accomplish the Monitor’s duties under this
Agreement.
588. The Monitor will be the agent of the Court and subject to the supervision and
orders of the Court, consistent with this Agreement. The Monitor will only have the duties,
responsibilities, and authority conferred by this Agreement. The Monitor will not, and is not
intended to, replace or assume the role or duties of any CPD or City official. The Superintendent
of CPD continues to be in charge of the Department.
589. In order to assess and report on whether the requirements of this Agreement have
been implemented and its objectives are being achieved, the Monitor will conduct the reviews,
audits, and assessments specified below, and such additional audits, reviews, and assessments as
the Monitor reasonably deems necessary to determine whether the Agreement has been
implemented as required.
B. Selection and Compensation of the Monitor
590. The Parties will jointly select a Monitor, acceptable to both. The Monitor will
have expertise in: policing and law enforcement practices, monitoring and oversight, preparation
of reports or other written materials for diverse audiences on complex topics, law and civil
rights, project management, data analysis and information technology, communication, and
budgeting. The Monitor will also have a demonstrated ability to collaborate with government
entities, and members of the monitoring team should have knowledge of Chicago communities
and experience working in Chicago with various constituencies. The Monitor and personnel
assisting the monitor will act in accordance with standards of integrity, and will consistently
demonstrate professionalism and respect in all interactions with the community, CPD members,
and all others with whom they interact in the course of performing the Monitor’s duties.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
183
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
591. In selecting the Monitor, the Parties have established a mutually agreed process in
which the public has opportunities to provide input.
a. Request for Proposals: The Parties have issued a Request for Proposals
(“RFP”) from candidates interested in serving as the Monitor. Responses to
the RFP will be due no earlier than 39 days after issuance. Representatives of
the Parties will form an Evaluation Committee, which will include
representation from OAG and the City and will be authorized to conduct the
selection process on behalf of the Parties.
b. Evaluation of Proposals and Public Comment: Following the RFP submission
deadline, the Parties will publicly identify the RFP respondents and publicly
post RFP responses for all respondents. The Parties will establish a public
comment period during which members of the public can review the
submissions and provide feedback about the applicants to the Parties. The
Evaluation Committee will evaluate the RFP Respondents’ written
submissions, conduct due diligence on the applicants, review and consider the
public comments, and use that information to reach agreement on a subset of
the teams to interview as finalists.
c. Interviews of Finalists: After the Evaluation Committee narrows the pool of
candidates to a group of finalists, those finalists will be invited to participate
in a series of interviews with the Parties and various engaged community
stakeholders. All interviews will be in person and conducted in Chicago.
d. Public Forum: The Parties will also provide an opportunity for finalists to
present and respond to questions and concerns from the Chicago community.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
184
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
The Evaluation Committee will host a public meeting during which finalists
will make short presentations and respond to written questions submitted by
members of the public in attendance at the forum. The public will be given an
opportunity to provide additional feedback on the finalists at the end of the in-
person forum.
e. Selection and Recommendation to the Court: The Parties will review and
consider all information gathered by the Evaluation Committee regarding each
finalist and work to jointly select a Monitor and monitoring team. The Parties
will then submit a joint motion to the Court seeking approval of the Monitor
they have selected. The Court may also conduct a private interview of the
Parties’ selection before granting or denying its approval of the Monitor.
592. The Parties’ Monitor selection will be subject to the Court’s approval.
593. If the Parties are unable to agree on a Monitor, each Party will submit the name of
one individual or one group of individuals, along with resumes and cost proposals, to the Court,
and the Court will choose a candidate or candidate team proposed by one of the Parties. When
deciding between the Parties’ preferred candidates, the Court may consider submissions from the
Parties in making its determination.
594. The City will bear all reasonable fees and costs of the Monitor. During the
selection process for the Monitor, the Parties agreed to an annual cap of $_________ per year.
595. The Parties recognize the importance of ensuring that the fees and costs borne by
the City are reasonable. Accordingly, the Monitor will submit a proposed budget annually to the
Court for approval. Upon a motion by the Monitor or either Party, or sua sponte, the Court may
revise the Monitor’s annual budget consistent with the terms of this Agreement if it finds that the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
185
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
increase is necessary for the Monitor to fulfill its duties under the Agreement and the increase is
not due to a failure in planning, budgeting, or performance by the Monitor.
596. In the event that any dispute arises regarding the reasonableness or payment of the
Monitor’s fees and costs, the Parties and the Monitor will attempt to resolve such dispute
cooperatively prior to seeking the assistance of the Court.
597. The City will provide the Monitor with office space and reasonable office
support, such as furniture, telephones, computers, internet access, information technology
support, secure document storage, and document scanning and copying capabilities.
598. At any time after being selected, the Monitor may request to be allowed to hire,
employ, or contract with such additional persons or entities as are reasonably necessary to
perform the tasks assigned to the Monitor by this Agreement. Any person or entity hired or
otherwise retained by the Monitor will be subject to the provisions of this Agreement, including
the cap and annual budget provisions set out in this Section. The Monitor will notify the Parties
in writing if the Monitor wishes to hire or retain such additional person or entity. The notice will
identify and describe the qualifications of the person or entity to be hired or retained, as well as
the monitoring task to be performed. If the Parties agree with the Monitor’s proposal, the
Monitor will be authorized to hire or retain such additional person or entity. The Parties will
have 21 days to object to any such proposal after being notified of it. If the Parties and the
Monitor are unable to reach agreement regarding the proposal within this time period, the Court
will resolve the dispute.
599. At least annually, the Parties will submit written feedback to the Monitor, the
Parties, and the Court regarding the Monitor. The feedback may address such topics as the
Monitor’s overall effectiveness in carrying out the Monitor’s duties, suggestions for enhancing
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
186
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
the Monitor’s effectiveness, the Monitor’s ability to work cost-effectively and on budget, and
whether the Monitor is adequately engaging the community and relevant stakeholders. Upon
receiving the Parties’ feedback, the Court may convene the Parties and the Monitor to discuss the
feedback.
600. At any time, on motion by either of the Parties or the Court’s own determination,
the Court may remove the Monitor for good cause.
601. In the event the Monitor is removed, resigns, or is no longer able to fulfill its
responsibilities under this Agreement, the Court will appoint a replacement, acceptable to both
Parties. The selection of the new Monitor will be made pursuant to a method agreed to by the
Parties. If the Parties are unable to agree on a method of selection or make a selection within 45
days of the Monitor’s removal, resignation, or incapacitation, each Party will submit the names
of one individual or one group of individuals, along with resumes and cost proposals, to the
Court, and the Court will choose a candidate or candidate team proposed by one of the Parties. In
the event of the Monitor’s removal, resignation, or incapacitation, the Court may appoint an
interim Monitor to serve until such time as the replacement selection process has been
completed.
602. Except for the period in which a new or replacement Monitor is being selected,
there will be a Monitor in place at all times while this Agreement is in effect.
C. Review of CPD Policies and Procedures
603. CPD will develop, revise, implement, and maintain policies and procedures as
required by this Agreement consistent with the timelines identified herein. CPD will ensure that
its policies and procedures are plainly written, logically organized, and use clearly defined terms.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
187
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
604. The City and CPD will submit all policies and procedures required to be
implemented or maintained by this Agreement to the Monitor and OAG for review, comment,
and, subsequently, if necessary, objection. When the City and CPD have developed the draft of a
new or revised policy or procedure required by this Agreement, they will consult in a
collaborative manner at the earliest feasible time with the Monitor and OAG, with the goal of
developing consensus on the substance of the policy or procedure, and make any necessary and
appropriate adjustments based on those consultations. The City and CPD will submit the final
draft of any new or revised policy or procedure subject to review and comment by the Monitor
and OAG to the Monitor and OAG at least 30 days before the policy or procedure is scheduled to
take effect, unless the Parties and the Monitor agree that a shorter period of time is appropriate
under the circumstances. The Parties and the Monitor will work collaboratively on developing
and revising policies and procedures related to this Agreement.
605. In the event that the Monitor and OAG fail to comment on submitted policies or
procedures within the 30-day period, the policy or procedure will be deemed to be non-
objectionable by the Monitor and OAG, unless the Monitor, OAG, or both state in writing that
additional time is necessary to complete an adequate review and the reason why additional time
is necessary. In such writing, the Monitor, OAG, or both will specify how much additional time
is necessary, which will not exceed 15 additional days. Any additional time required by the
Monitor or OAG beyond the initial 30-day review period will extend CPD’s deadline for
implementing the policy or procedure. The Parties may seek relief from the Court to the extent
the process of reviewing and approving a particular policy or procedure has become
unreasonably delayed.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
188
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
606. To the extent the Parties and the Monitor have unresolved disagreements
regarding a particular policy or procedure after attempting to resolve them for at least 30 days,
the Monitor or OAG may provide a written notice of outstanding objections to the City and CPD
(“objection notice”). The Monitor or OAG may object only if a policy or procedure does not
incorporate the requirements of this Agreement or is inconsistent with the goals and objectives of
this Agreement or applicable law.
607. In the event the Monitor or OAG provides an objection notice, the Monitor will
convene the Parties and attempt to resolve the identified objections within 30 days of the
objection notice being received by the City (“workout period”). The Monitor will issue a
proposed resolution of remaining objections in writing at the conclusion of the workout period. If
either Party disagrees with the Monitor’s resolution of an objection, either Party may ask the
Court to resolve such dispute. Subject to the limited extraordinary circumstances exception set
out below, CPD will not publish or implement new or revised policies or procedures required by
this Agreement until the Monitor and OAG have reviewed and commented on such policies or
procedures, or until the workout period and related resolution processes have occurred.
608. If extraordinary circumstances demand an immediate revision or clarification
(e.g., due to a change in law or other urgent circumstance), CPD may issue a temporary policy or
procedure. CPD must provide prompt notice of the temporary policy or procedure to the Monitor
and OAG, and the temporary policy or procedure will only remain in effect until the adoption of
a revised policy or procedure pursuant to the review, comment, and objections process set forth
above. This paragraph does not permanently exempt any new or revised policy or procedure
from the review and comment process.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
189
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
609. The Parties and the Monitor will work collaboratively and cooperatively to
establish and adhere to a schedule that ensures policies and procedures required by this
Agreement are reviewed adequately, efficiently, and expeditiously.
610. CPD will ensure that its officers and the public have a meaningful opportunity to
review and comment on material changes to CPD policies and procedures required by this
Agreement. After the Monitor and OAG comment on a proposed policy or procedure, or all
workout period processes described above have been completed, CPD will post proposed
policies and procedures on its public website and provide its officers and the public with an
opportunity to comment for a period of not less than 15 days. There will be reasonable
exceptions to the posting requirement for policies and procedures that are law enforcement
sensitive, such as procedures regarding undercover officers or operations. In response to any
comments received, CPD will consider whether any further revisions to the proposed policy or
procedure are appropriate. Changes implemented in response to public or officer comment will
be subject to consultation among the Parties, and review and comment by the Monitor and OAG
prior to publication and implementation.
611. CPD will post final and published department-wide directives, policies, and
procedures on CPD’s public website, subject to reasonable exceptions for policies and
procedures that are law enforcement sensitive.
612. CPD will provide a mechanism to electronically access approved and published
department-wide directives in a usable, organized, and searchable format.
613. CPD will periodically review each policy required to be revised or developed by
this Agreement. CPD will conduct an initial review of each such policy no later than two years
after the policy’s implementation as provided for in this Agreement. CPD will conduct
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
190
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
subsequent reviews every two years thereafter, although the Parties may modify the timeframe
for the review of a specific policy. The purpose of the initial and subsequent reviews is to
evaluate whether the policy provides effective guidance and direction to CPD members and is
consistent with the requirements of this Agreement and current law.
614. CPD will make any necessary updates to its policies and training based on
changes in the law that are relevant to CPD’s law enforcement activities and will promptly
communicate to its members such changes in the law and related policies.
D. Review of Implementation Plans and Training Materials
615. CPD will submit the following plans required by this Agreement to the Monitor
and OAG for their review and approval :
a. the Crisis Intervention Plan referenced in Part G of the Crisis Intervention
section of this Agreement;
b. the CIT Implementation Plan referenced in Part D of the Crisis Intervention
section of this Agreement;
c. the Training Plan referenced in Part B of the Training section;
d. the plan regarding span of control and unity of command referenced in Part C
of the Supervision section of this Agreement;
e. the recruitment, hiring, and promotion plans referenced in Part D of the
Recruitment, Hiring, and Promotion section of this Agreement;
f. the Officer Support Systems Plan referenced in Part B of the Officer Wellness
and Support section of this Agreement;
g. the Equipment and Technology Audit Response Plan referenced in Part C of
the Officer Wellness and Support section of this Agreement;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
191
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
h. the training plans for COPA, the Deputy PSIG, and BIA referenced in Part H
of the Accountability and Transparency section of this Agreement; and
i. the Data Systems Plan referenced in Part E of the Data Collection, Analysis,
and Management section of this Agreement.
616. When the City and CPD have developed the draft of a plan, they will consult at
the earliest feasible time with the Monitor and OAG, with the goal of developing consensus on
the substance and timetable for the plan, and make any necessary and appropriate adjustments
based on those consultations.
617. CPD will submit the final draft of each plan required by this Agreement and
subject to review and approval by the Monitor and OAG to the Monitor and OAG at least 30
days prior to the proposed date for initial implementation. In the event that the Monitor and OAG
fail to comment on a submitted plan within the 30-day period, the Monitor and OAG will be
deemed to have no objection to the plan, unless the Monitor, OAG, or both state in writing that
additional time is necessary to complete an adequate review. Requests for additional time to
review plans will be subject to the same standard and process set forth above for requesting
additional time to review policies and procedures. The Parties and the Monitor will adhere to the
workout period process to resolve objections as necessary. The Monitor or OAG may object if a
proposed plan does not incorporate the requirements of this Agreement or is inconsistent with the
goals and objectives of this Agreement.
618. CPD will submit all new or revised curricula, lesson plans, and course materials
related to trainings required by this Agreement to the Monitor and OAG for their review,
comment, and, subsequently, if necessary, objection. When the City and CPD have developed
the draft of any such materials required by this Agreement, they will consult at the earliest
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
192
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
feasible time with the Monitor and OAG, with the goal of developing consensus on the substance
of the materials, and make any necessary and appropriate adjustments based on those
consultations. CPD will provide final drafts of curricula, lesson plans, and course materials
subject to review and comment by the Monitor and OAG to the Monitor and OAG at least 30
days prior to instituting the applicable training. In the event that the Monitor and OAG fail to
comment on submitted training materials within the 30-day period, the Monitor and OAG will be
deemed to have no objection to the training materials, unless the Monitor, OAG, or both state in
writing that additional time is necessary to complete an adequate review. Requests for additional
time to review training materials will be subject to the same standard and process set forth above
for requesting additional time to review policies and procedures. The Parties and the Monitor
will adhere to the workout period process to resolve objections as necessary.
E. Compliance Reviews and Audits
619. The Monitor will conduct reviews or audits as necessary to determine whether the
City and CPD have substantially complied with the requirements of this Agreement. Compliance
with a requirement means that the City and CPD: (a) have incorporated the requirement into
policy; (b) have trained all relevant personnel as necessary to fulfill their responsibilities
pursuant to the requirement; and (c) are carrying out the requirement in actual practice.
620. CPD members who violate policies, procedures, orders, or directives that are
required by this Agreement or that implement its provisions will be held accountable by CPD
and the City, including through CPD’s progressive discipline process. The Monitor may review
and audit whether CPD is enforcing the policies, procedures, orders, or directives required by or
implementing this Agreement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
193
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
621. The Monitor will conduct compliance reviews in a fair manner with reliable
means and methods. The Monitor may use sampling and compilation data based on standard and
reliable methodologies, to be shared with the Parties, in conducting compliance reviews and
audits. Those methodologies will be shared with the Parties in advance of their use.
F. Community Surveys
622. Within 180 days of being appointed by the Court, and every two years thereafter,
the Monitor will conduct reliable, representative, and comprehensive surveys of a broad cross
section of members of the Chicago community regarding CPD.
623. The surveys will seek to assess perceptions of, and satisfaction with, CPD. The
surveys will examine perceptions of CPD’s overall police services, trustworthiness, community
engagement, effectiveness, responsiveness, handling of misconduct complaints and
investigations, and interactions with members of the Chicago community, including interactions
with individuals who are people of color, LGBTQI, in crisis, youth, members of religious
minorities, or have disabilities.
624. Analysis of the results of the surveys may be used as assessments to demonstrate
sustained and continuing improvement in constitutional policing and community trust of CPD.
625. To assist the Monitor in conducting the surveys, and only if the Monitor’s team
does not include a person or entity capable of conducting the surveys, the Monitor will retain an
individual or entity, approved by the City and OAG, and timely included in the Monitor’s annual
budget submission, that will:
a. design, conduct, and analyze the surveys in a statistically reliable manner;
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
194
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
b. develop a baseline of measures on community satisfaction with policing,
attitudes among CPD officers, and the quality of police-community
interactions;
c. ensure that the surveys are designed to capture a representative sample of
Chicago residents drawn from its many diverse communities;
d. conduct the surveys required by this Agreement in English, Spanish, and other
languages, as necessary, to ensure appropriate representation from the sample
group;
e. solicit input from CPD officers and command staff, OAG representatives, and
community members to identify emerging issues or concerns related to
policing in Chicago;
f. consult with CPD and OAG regarding the development and methodology of
the surveys; and
g. prepare a report of the findings, including pattern and trend analysis, for each
survey conducted.
626. CPD and the City will cooperate with the design and delivery of the surveys,
including by allowing CPD officers to confidentially respond.
627. The results of the survey will be provided to the Court and be publicly distributed
and posted on CPD’s and the Monitor’s websites.
628. CPD will consider the results of the surveys in reviewing CPD policies, training,
and practices as necessary and appropriate.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
195
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
G. Monitoring Plan and Review Methodology
629. Within 90 days of being appointed by the Court, the Monitor will develop a plan
for conducting compliance reviews and audits (“Monitoring Plan”) for the first year of
implementation. The Monitor will submit a draft Monitoring Plan to the Parties for their review
and approval within 75 days of the selection of the Monitor. The Parties will have 15 days
following receipt of a draft to review it, and provide comment or notice of any objections to the
Monitor and the other Party. In subsequent years, the Monitor will, in coordination with the
Parties and pursuant to the process outlined in this paragraph, prepare an annual Monitoring Plan
for each year this Agreement remains in effect.
630. Each Monitoring Plan will clearly delineate the requirements of this Agreement to
be assessed for compliance, indicating which requirements will be assessed together.
631. Each Monitoring Plan will create a tentative schedule for conducting compliance
reviews or audits of applicable requirements.
632. At least 45 days prior to the initiation of any compliance review or audit, the
Monitor will submit a proposed methodology for the review or audit to the Parties. The Parties
will submit any comments or concerns regarding the proposed methodology to the Monitor no
later than 30 days prior to the proposed date of the review or audit. The Monitor will modify the
methodology as necessary to address any concerns or will inform the Parties in writing of the
reasons it does not modify its proposed methodology.
H. Monitoring Technical Assistance and Recommendations
633. The Monitor may, at the request of the City, CPD, or OAG, or on its own
initiative, provide technical assistance and make recommendations to the Parties regarding
measures that may facilitate timely full and effective compliance with this Agreement and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
196
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
achievement of its underlying objectives. Such technical assistance and recommendations may
include suggestions to change, modify, or amend a provision of this Agreement; to develop or
amend policy; to provide additional training in any area related to this Agreement; or to modify
the content or form of existing training.
I. Comprehensive Assessment
634. Three years after the Effective Date, the Monitor will conduct a comprehensive
assessment to determine whether and to what extent the City and CPD are in compliance with
this Agreement, whether the outcomes intended by this Agreement are being achieved, and
whether any modifications to this Agreement are necessary in light of changed circumstances or
unanticipated impact (or lack of impact) of the requirements.
635. This comprehensive assessment will also address areas of greatest progress and
achievement, and the requirements that appear to have contributed to these achievements, as well
as areas of greatest concern, including strategies for accelerating full and effective compliance.
636. Based upon this comprehensive assessment, the Monitor will recommend any
modifications to this Agreement necessary to achieve and sustain intended results. Where the
Parties agree with the Monitor’s recommendations, the Parties will move the Court to modify
this Agreement accordingly. In the event of a disagreement, the Parties will submit their
positions to the Court for resolution. This provision in no way diminishes the Parties’ ability to
move to modify this Agreement subject to the Court’s approval. Nothing in this Agreement will
empower the Monitor to unilaterally modify the terms of this Agreement.
637. The Monitor will be appointed for an initial period running from the Monitor’s
appointment by the Court through the completion of the comprehensive assessment. At the
conclusion of the comprehensive assessment, there will be an evaluation by the Court to
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
197
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
determine whether to renew the Monitor’s appointment until the termination of this Agreement.
The Court will renew the Monitor’s appointment unless there is substantial evidence that the
Monitor has: materially exceeded the Monitor’s authority under this Agreement; engaged in
misconduct or unethical behavior; demonstrated a lack of competence to perform the duties
required by this Agreement; or materially failed to perform its responsibilities under this
Agreement.
638. On a semiannual basis, the Monitor will file with the Court written public reports
regarding the status of compliance with this Agreement, which will include, but not be limited to,
the following information:
a. a description of the work conducted by the Monitor during the reporting
period;
b. a description of each Agreement requirement assessed during the reporting
period, indicating which requirements have been, as appropriate:
i. incorporated into policy,
ii. the subject of sufficient training for all relevant CPD or City personnel,
and
iii. carried out in actual practice;
c. the methodology and specific findings for each compliance review conducted;
d. for any requirements that were reviewed or audited and found not to have
been implemented, the Monitor’s recommendations, if any, regarding
necessary steps to achieve compliance;
e. a projection of the work to be completed during the upcoming reporting
period; and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
198
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
f. a summary of principal challenges or concerns related to the City’s achieving
full and effective compliance with this Agreement.
639. For the final semiannual report for each calendar year, the Monitor will also
include: a summary of all Agreement requirements indicating which requirements have been
incorporated into policy, the subject of sufficient training for all relevant CPD or City personnel,
and carried out in actual practice.
640. The Monitor will provide a copy of the semiannual reports to the Parties in draft
form no more than 30 days after the end of each reporting period. The Parties will have 15 days
following receipt of a draft report to comment on the draft report, and provide those comments to
the Monitor and the other Party. The Monitor will consider the Parties’ comments and make
appropriate changes, if any, before filing the report with the Court.
641. The Monitor will maintain a public website and publish each semiannual report,
together with the Parties’ comments on the draft report, on the website immediately after filing
the report with the Court.
642. In addition to the mandatory semiannual reports, the Monitor may, at any time,
prepare written reports on any issue or set of issues covered by the Agreement. The process for
commenting on and publishing these additional reports will be the same as the process applicable
to semiannual reports.
643. As an agent of the Court, the Monitor may raise any issue related to this
Agreement with the Court at any time.
J. Coordination with the Office of Inspector General
644. In conducting compliance reviews, and audits, and in developing its monitoring
plan and review methodologies, the Monitor may coordinate and confer with the OIG for the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
199
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
City to avoid duplication of effort. However, it is the exclusive role of the Monitor and OAG to
assess compliance with this Agreement.
K. Communication Among the Monitor, the Parties, and the Public
645. The Monitor will maintain regular contact with the Parties in order to ensure
effective and timely communication regarding the status of compliance with this Agreement. To
facilitate this communication, the Monitor will conduct monthly meetings, which will include, at
a minimum, participation by the CPD Superintendent, counsel for the City, other CPD personnel
designated by the Superintendent to implement this Agreement, and OAG.
646. The Parties have entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) with
certain community organizations that have established a broad-based community coalition
(“Coalition”) committed to monitoring, enforcing, and educating the community about this
Agreement. No less frequently than quarterly, the Monitor will participate in meetings with the
Coalition, as provided in Paragraph 9 of the MOA.
647. The Monitor will hold public meetings to explain the Monitor’s reports and
inform the public about this Agreement’s implementation process, as well as to hear community
perspectives on police interactions. The Monitor will notify the Parties in advance of the date,
time, and location when such meetings are scheduled.
648. The Monitor will periodically meet with CPD officers to provide them with
information about the Agreement and its implementation, and to respond to their questions,
concerns, and suggestions. The Monitor will also periodically meet with the collective
bargaining representatives of CPD officers.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
200
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
L. Public Statements, Testimony, Records, and Conflict of Interest
649. Except as required or authorized by the terms of this Agreement, or when
authorized jointly by the Parties, or by the Court, the Monitor will not make any public
statements or issue findings with regard to any act or omission of the Parties, or their agents,
representatives, or employees, or disclose confidential, non-public information and materials
received by or reviewed by the Monitor pursuant to this Agreement.
650. The Monitor will not testify in any other litigation or proceeding with regard to
any act or omission of the City, CPD, or any of their officials, officers, agents, or employees
related to this Agreement or regarding any matter or subject that the Monitor may have received
knowledge of as a result of the Monitor’s performance under this Agreement without an order
issued by the Court. This paragraph does not apply to any proceeding before the Court related to
performance of contracts or subcontracts for monitoring this Agreement.
651. Unless such conflict is disclosed and waived by the Parties, the Monitor and
members of his or her team will not accept employment or provide consulting services that
would present a conflict of interest with the team member’s responsibilities under this
Agreement, including being retained (on a paid or unpaid basis) by any current or future private
litigant or claimant, or such litigant’s or claimant’s attorney, in connection with a claim or suit
against the City, CPD, or their officials, officers, agents, or employees.
652. The Monitor is an agent of the Court and not a state or local agency, or an agent
thereof. Accordingly, the records maintained by the Monitor will be treated confidentially, and
will not be deemed public records subject to public inspection under the Illinois Freedom of
Information Act, or subject to discovery in any litigation.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
201
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
653. The Monitor will not be liable for any claim, lawsuit, or demand arising out of the
Monitor’s performance pursuant to this Agreement brought by non-parties to this Agreement.
M. CPD Consent Decree Implementation
654. The City and CPD agree to hire, retain, or reassign current City or CPD
employees to form a unit with the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to facilitate
compliance with this Agreement.
655. At a minimum, CPD will designate personnel to be responsible for:
a. coordinating the City’s and CPD’s compliance and implementation activities;
b. facilitating the provision of data, documents, materials, and access to the
City’s and CPD’s personnel to the Monitor and OAG, as needed;
c. ensuring that all data, documents, and records are maintained as provided in
this Agreement; and
d. assisting in assigning implementation and compliance related tasks to CPD
personnel, as directed by the Superintendent or the Superintendent’s designee.
N. Implementation Assessment and Report
656. The City and CPD agree to collect and maintain all data and records necessary to
document compliance with this Agreement, including data and records necessary for the Monitor
to conduct reliable compliance reviews and audits.
657. Beginning with the Monitor’s first report filed with the Court, and for each
subsequent semiannual report by the Monitor, the City agrees to file a status report one month
before each of the Monitor’s reports is due for the duration of this Agreement. The City’s status
report will delineate the steps taken by CPD during the reporting period to comply with this
Agreement, and CPD’s assessment of the status of its progress implementing this Agreement.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
202
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
O. Access and Confidentiality
658. To facilitate the Monitor’s work, the Monitor may conduct on-site visits and
assessments with or without prior notice to the City or CPD. While the Monitor has the right to
conduct on-site visits and assessments without prior notice at any time, in order to facilitate the
efficiency and effectiveness of its monitoring activities, the Monitor will make good faith efforts
to provide advance notice of its on-site visits and activities to the City and CPD to the extent
practicable and appropriate.
659. The Monitor will have access to all individuals, facilities, trainings, meetings,
disciplinary proceedings, reviews, and incident scenes that the Monitor reasonably deems
necessary to carry out the duties assigned to the Monitor by this Agreement. The City will ensure
that it facilitates the Monitor’s access in a prompt, cooperative, and unobstructive manner.
660. CPD will notify the Monitor as soon as practicable, and in any case within 24
hours, of any officer-involved shootings, any death of a person in CPD custody, or any arrest of a
CPD member. In the event a CPD member is arrested by a law enforcement agency other than
CPD, CPD will notify the Monitor as soon as practicable, and in any case within 24 hours of
receiving notice of the arrest. The Monitor will cooperate with the City to obtain access to people
and facilities in a reasonable manner that, consistent with the Monitor’s responsibilities,
minimizes interference with daily operations.
661. The City and CPD will ensure that the Monitor has prompt access to all City and
CPD documents and data related to the Agreement that the monitor reasonably deems necessary
to carry out the duties assigned to the Monitor by this Agreement, except any communications,
documents, or data to which access is limited or precluded by court order, or protected by the
work product doctrine or the attorney-client privilege (collectively, “privilege”).
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
203
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
662. Privilege may not be used to prevent the Monitor from observing training
sessions, disciplinary hearings, or other CPD, COPA, or Police Board activities or proceedings
that do not involve the provision or receipt of legal advice. The City is not required to provide
the Monitor with access to documents or data that is privileged. Should the City or CPD decline
to provide the Monitor with access to communications, documents, or data based on privilege,
the City or CPD will inform the Monitor and OAG that documents or data are being withheld on
the basis of privilege which may, but need not be, in the form of a privilege log. If the Monitor or
OAG objects to an assertion of privilege, the Monitor or OAG may challenge the propriety of the
privilege assertion before the Court.
663. In coordination with the City’s legal counsel, OAG and its consultants and agents
will have access to all City and CPD personnel, facilities, training, documents, and data related
to this Agreement, except any documents or data protected by privilege. OAG and its consultants
and agents will coordinate with the City’s legal counsel to access personnel, facilities, training,
documents, and data in a reasonable manner that is consistent with OAG’s right to seek
enforcement of this Agreement and that minimizes interference with daily operations. The City is
not required to provide the Monitor with access to communications, documents, or data that is
privileged. Should the City or CPD decline to provide OAG with access to documents or data
based on privilege, the City or CPD will inform OAG that that documents or data are being
withheld on this basis, which may, but need not be, in the form of a privilege log. If OAG objects
to a privilege assertion by the City or CPD, OAG may challenge the propriety of the privilege
assertion before the Court.
664. The Monitor and OAG will provide the City and CPD with reasonable notice of a
request for documents or data. Upon such request, the City and CPD will provide the documents
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
204
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
or data (in electronic format, where readily available) in a timely manner, unless withheld based
on privilege.
665. The Monitor and OAG will maintain all confidential or non-public information
provided by the City and CPD in a confidential manner. Other than as expressly provided in this
Agreement, disclosure to the Monitor will not be deemed a waiver of any privilege or right the
City or CPD may assert, including those recognized at common law or created by statute, rule, or
regulation, against any other person or entity with respect to the disclosure of any document or
data.
P. Court Jurisdiction, Modification of the Agreement, and Enforcement
666. This Agreement will become effective upon Court approval and entry as an order
of the Court.
667. This Court has jurisdiction over the action that led to this Agreement pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367. The Court is adopting and entering this Agreement as a judgment
of the Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Constitution and laws of the United States; the
Illinois Constitution; the Illinois Human Rights Act, 775 ILCS 5/5-102(C); and the Illinois Civil
Rights Act of 2003, 740 ILCS 23/5.
668. Venue is proper in the Northern District of Illinois pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391,
because the City is located in the Northern District of Illinois.
669. The Court will retain jurisdiction of this action for all purposes until such time as
the Court finds that the City has achieved full and effective compliance with this Agreement and
maintained such compliance for no less than two consecutive years.
670. The State, through OAG, acknowledges the good faith of the City and CPD in
trying to take actions necessary to ensure constitutional policing and improve community trust in
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
205
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
CPD. However, the State, through OAG, reserves the right to seek enforcement of the provisions
of this Agreement as set forth herein if OAG determines that the City and CPD have failed to
comply with any provision of this Agreement.
671. Prior to initiating enforcement proceedings before the Court, the State, through
OAG, will notify the City in writing of the provisions of this Agreement for which Court
enforcement will be sought. The State will not initiate enforcement proceedings until at least 90
days after providing the notice required by this paragraph to the City (“cure period”). During the
cure period, the State, the City, and CPD will make a good faith attempt to resolve the issues
underlying the planned enforcement proceedings without intervention from the Court. In the
event OAG provides notice of enforcement in accordance with this paragraph, at the request of
either Party, the Monitor will convene the Parties and attempt to resolve the identified issues
within 45 days of the written notice to the City. If the Monitor’s efforts are unsuccessful, either
Party may ask the Court to attempt to resolve such dispute. If the Parties are unable to resolve the
identified issues or to reach agreement regarding a plan for resolution during the cure period, the
State, through OAG, may initiate enforcement proceedings with the Court after the conclusion of
the cure period.
672. OAG and the City may jointly agree to make changes, modifications, and
amendments to this Agreement, which will be effective if approved by the Court. Such changes,
modifications, and amendments to this Agreement will be encouraged when the Parties agree, or
where the Monitor’s reviews or audits demonstrate that an Agreement provision as drafted is not
furthering the purpose of this Agreement or that there is a preferable alternative that will achieve
the same purpose.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
206
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
673. At any time, the City, OAG, or the Monitor may propose substituting alternative
requirements for one or more requirements of this Agreement. In any case when such a proposal
is made, the Parties may agree to suspend the current Agreement requirement for an agreed-upon
time period while the alternative is being considered. If the Parties and the Monitor agree that the
alternative requirements are as effective or more effective at achieving the purpose of the
original requirements, the alternative requirements will be adopted and submitted to the Court for
incorporation in the Agreement. If the Parties and the Monitor cannot agree on the proposed
alternative, either Party or the Monitor can submit the matter to the Court for resolution.
674. The Parties agree to defend the provisions of this Agreement. The Parties will
notify each other of any proceeding in which a non-party challenges a provision or provisions of
this Agreement. In the event any provision of this Agreement is challenged in any state court, the
Parties will seek removal to federal court and consolidation with this action.
675. The City agrees to require compliance with this Agreement by its officers,
officials, employees, agents, agencies, assigns, or successors.
676. The City will be responsible for providing necessary and reasonable financial
resources necessary through steps or processes that can include the budget process to fulfill its
obligations under this Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
677. The City’s entry into this Agreement is not an admission by the City, CPD, or any
agent or employee of either entity that it has engaged in any unconstitutional, illegal, or
otherwise improper activities or conduct. The City’s entry into this Agreement is not an
admission of any of the findings or conclusions contained in the DOJ’s Report.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
207
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Q. Scope of the Agreement
678. This Agreement resolves all claims in the State’s Complaint filed in this case, and
any amendments thereto, except for claims relating to the pointing of a firearm by a CPD
member, which may be the subject of litigation between the Parties. Other than the claims
relating to this issue, this Agreement constitutes a full and complete settlement of any and all
civil claims, known or unknown, the State may have, as of the Effective Date of this Agreement,
against the City regarding any alleged pattern or practice of unconstitutional conduct, civil rights
violations, or other unlawful conduct by the City as referenced in the DOJ Report, the PATF
Report, or the Complaint.
679. This Agreement was reached as a result of the authority granted to the State under
the doctrine of parens patriae, the Illinois Human Rights Act, and pursuant to the State’s
proprietary interests under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to seek declaratory or equitable relief to remedy a
pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement that deprives individuals of rights, privileges,
or immunities secured by the Constitution or Illinois law.
680. This Agreement is binding upon all Parties hereto, by and through their officials,
employees, agents, representatives, agencies, assigns, and successors. If the City establishes or
reorganizes a government agency or entity whose function includes overseeing, regulating,
investigating, or otherwise reviewing the operations of CPD or any aspect thereof, the City
agrees to ensure that these functions and entities are consistent with the terms of this Agreement
and will incorporate the terms of this Agreement into the oversight, regulatory, investigation, or
review functions of the government agency or entity as necessary to ensure consistency.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
208
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
681. Nothing in this Agreement will in any way prevent or limit the City’s right to
adopt future measures that exceed or surpass the obligations contained herein, as long as the
terms of this Agreement are satisfied.
682. The City is responsible for providing necessary support and resources to CPD to
enable CPD to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement.
683. No person or entity is or is intended to be a third-party beneficiary of this
Agreement for the purposes of any civil, criminal, or administrative action. The Parties agree that
this Agreement is not, and shall not be construed as, an admission of liability by the City or
CPD, or any of their departments, entities, agencies, officials, agents, or employees. Nothing in
this Agreement shall be used by any third party to create, establish, or support a claim of liability
by or against the City or the CPD or any of their officials, officers, agents or employees under
any federal, state or municipal law, including, but not limited to, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the U.S.
Constitution, the Illinois Constitution, the Illinois Civil Rights Act of 2003, or the Illinois Human
Rights Act.
684. This Agreement is an integrated agreement. It contains the entire understanding
and agreement of the Parties, and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, negotiations,
and discussion of the Parties, whether oral or written, relating to its contents. There are no other
agreements, understandings, restrictions, representations, or warranties other than as set forth in
this Agreement. No prior drafts or prior or contemporaneous communications, oral or written,
will be relevant or admissible for purposes of determining the meaning of any provisions herein
in any litigation or any other proceeding.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
209
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
R. Other Relevant Agreements
685. As set forth in the MOA regarding the Coalition, the Parties have conferred
certain rights on the Coalition relating to the enforcement of this Agreement (which is referred to
in the MOA as the “Consent Decree”):
a. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Consent Decree, the Consent
Decree is enforceable by the Court upon a motion by the Coalition subject to
the conditions in subparagraphs (a) through (b) herein. Prior to filing any
enforcement motion the Coalition will (i) meet and confer in good faith with
the Parties to attempt to resolve issues identified by the Coalition without the
need for intervention by the Court, and (ii) follow the prerequisites for filing
enforcement motions required of the State set forth above.
b. The Coalition is defined as the plaintiff organizations in the Campbell lawsuit
and the plaintiffs in the Communities United lawsuit (collectively “Coalition
Founders”), as well as other civil rights and community organizations in the
City of Chicago who are members of the Coalition. The Coalition’s rights set
forth in Paragraph (a) above will not apply to any individual or organization
that is not a member of the Coalition, including but not limited to individuals
or organizations that were once members of the Coalition but subsequently
left or were removed from the Coalition. The Coalition Founders are the sole
arbiters of the Coalition’s objectives, composition, and structure.
686. The Parties acknowledge the City has entered into four collective bargaining
agreements effective July 1, 2012 (individually, and collectively, the “CBAs”) with unions
representing sworn police officers (“Unions”). The Parties further acknowledge that the City and
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
210
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
the Unions are currently negotiating successor agreements to the CBAs (“Successor CBAs”).
The Parties further acknowledge that the Unions and the City have certain rights and obligations
under the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (“IPLRA”) and that the IPLRA
contains provisions for the City and the Unions to enforce their respective rights and obligations,
including a process, set forth in Section 14 of the IPLRA and Section 28.3 of the current CBAs,
for resolving bargaining impasses between the City and the Unions over issues subject to a
bargaining obligation under the IPLRA (“Statutory Impasse Resolution Procedures”).
687. Nothing in this Consent Decree is intended to (a) alter any of the CBAs between
the City and the Unions; or (b) impair or conflict with the collective bargaining rights of
employees in those units under the IPLRA. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be interpreted
as obligating the City or the Unions to violate (i) the terms of the CBAs, including any Successor
CBAs resulting from the negotiation process (including Statutory Impasse Resolution
Procedures) mandated by the IPLRA with respect to the subject of wages, hours and terms and
conditions of employment unless such terms violate the U.S. Constitution, Illinois law or public
policy, or (ii) any bargaining obligations under the IPLRA, and/or waive any rights or
obligations thereunder. In negotiating Successor CBAs and during any Statutory Resolution
Impasse Procedures, the City shall use its best efforts to secure modifications to the CBAs
consistent with the terms of this Consent Decree, or to the extent necessary to provide for the
effective implementation of the provisions of this Consent Decree.
688. Nothing in this Agreement alters or incorporates any provision in the August 6,
2015 Investigatory Stop and Protective Pat Down Settlement Agreement between the City and
the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois (“ACLU Agreement”) for the duration of the
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
211
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
ACLU Agreement. Nor does this Agreement involve the Monitor reviewing the reforms
mandated by the ACLU Agreement or assessing compliance with the ACLU Agreement.
689. Nothing in this Part R is intended to otherwise modify the City’s obligations
under this Agreement.
S. Termination of the Agreement
690. The City will endeavor to achieve full and effective compliance within five years
of the Effective Date. On or about five years from the Effective Date, the Court will hold a
hearing to assess whether the Agreement should be terminated. This Agreement will terminate
when the Court finds that the City has achieved full and effective compliance with this
Agreement and has maintained such compliance with the material requirements for at least one
year for the sections delineated as Group A below, and for at least two years for the sections
delineated as Group B below.
a. Group A: Recruitment, Hiring, and Promotions; Training; and Officer
Wellness and Support.
b. Group B: Community Policing; Impartial Policing; Crisis Intervention; Use of
Force; Supervision; Accountability and Transparency; and Data Collection,
Analysis, and Management.
691. Upon request by the City, the Court will determine whether the City is in full and
effective compliance regarding any of the material requirements under the Agreement. The
Court’s determination of full and effective compliance will start the relevant one- or two- year
compliance periods detailed in Paragraph 690 above.
692. If the City and CPD have achieved compliance with some requirements, but not
others, the Court may terminate the Agreement as to those requirements for which compliance
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
212
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
has been achieved. The Monitor will not review, assess, or audit requirements that are so
terminated. At any time prior to the full termination of this Agreement, the Court may reinstate
previously terminated requirements upon a showing that compliance with such requirements has
materially lapsed.
693. Full and effective compliance with this Agreement means sustained compliance
with all material requirements of this Agreement. No specific numerical threshold will be
required to demonstrate full and effective compliance. Non-compliance with mere technicalities,
or temporary or isolated failure will not constitute failure to achieve full and effective
compliance. However, temporary compliance during a period of otherwise sustained non-
compliance will not constitute full and effective compliance with the Agreement.
694. In order for the City to seek to terminate this Agreement or portions of this
Agreement, the City must file a motion with the Court. Prior to filing a motion to terminate, the
City agrees to notify OAG and the Monitor in writing when the City believes that it is in full and
effective compliance with this Agreement and that such compliance has been maintained for the
required time period. Within 14 days of notification, the Parties will meet and confer at a
mutually agreeable time as to the status of compliance. If, after a period of 30 days of
consultation, the Parties cannot resolve any compliance issues, the City may file a motion to
terminate all or part of the Agreement.
695. If the City moves to terminate the Agreement, OAG will have 60 days after the
receipt of the City’s motion to file an objection to the motion. The Monitor will have 60 days
after the receipt of the City’s motion to certify whether it agrees that the City is in compliance
with the Agreement using methods for assessing compliance contemplated by a Monitoring Plan
or this Agreement. If the Monitor requests additional time, the Court may extend the Monitor’s
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
213
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
deadline to so certify if it determines that additional time is required by the Monitor to determine
compliance using methods for assessing compliance contemplated by a Monitoring Plan or this
Agreement. The Court will hold a hearing on the motion. To terminate a portion of the
Agreement, the Court must find that that portion of the Agreement is sufficiently severable from
the other requirements of the Agreement such that partial termination would not impede the
Monitor’s ability to assess the City’s compliance with other requirements of this Agreement.
696. At all times, the City will bear the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of
the evidence it has achieved full and effective compliance with the requirements of this
Agreement.
697. Prior to termination of this Agreement, CPD will develop a plan, in consultation
with the Monitor and OAG, to conduct compliance reviews, audits, and community surveys
deemed necessary and appropriate following the termination of the Consent Decree. CPD will
publish the plan for continuing assessments, if any, on CPD’s website.
XIII. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
698. The following terms—in their singular and plural forms and regardless of their
capitalization—and definitions apply to this Agreement:
699. “Academy” means CPD’s central training facility or the CPD staff assigned to the
Education and Training Division of CPD.
700. “Accountability Sergeant” means a CPD member at the rank of Sergeant
assigned to a district who is responsible for receiving, processing, and investigating complaints
made against CPD members, which are referred to the district by BIA.
701. “Administrative investigation” means the non-criminal investigation related to
misconduct or the actions of a CPD member.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
214
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
702. “Administrative investigation files” means the materials collected during the
course of an administrative investigation and maintained in the investigation file.
703. “Administrative notification” means the notification of COPA of one or more of
the incidents set forth in Chicago Municipal Code Section 2-78-120(c)–(e) or a domestic
violence incident involving a CPD officer.
704. “Anonymous reporting website” means a website available to CPD members for
the purpose of anonymously reporting member misconduct.
705. “Best efforts” require a party, in good faith, to take all reasonable steps to
achieve the stated objective.
706. “Best practices” means any guidelines, standards, policies, procedures, or
methods that are consistent with the requirements and goals of this Agreement, and are either
supported by research or empirical evidence or are accepted by industry-recognized
professionals, agencies, or organizations in the relevant subject area. In case of any conflict or
inconsistency between industry-recognized professionals, agencies, or organizations regarding a
best practice, CPD is entitled to adopt the practice it prefers, provided that the practice is
consistent with the requirements and goals of this Agreement.
707. “BIA” means CPD’s Bureau of Internal Affairs.
708. “BIA Lieutenant” means a CPD member in the rank of Lieutenant assigned to
BIA and responsible for supervising investigations conducted by Accountability Sergeants in
accordance with this Agreement.
709. “Body-worn camera” means audio-visual recording equipment that is worn
affixed to an officer’s person, uniform, or equipment, with the capability of capturing, recording,
and storing audio and/or visual information for later viewing.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
215
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
710. “Case Management System” or “CMS” means an electronic case management
system meeting, at a minimum, the requirements of this Agreement.
711. “Child” means an individual under the age of 13.
712. “City” means the City of Chicago, an Illinois municipal corporation, and any
agent, agency, officer, employee, assignee, or successor thereof.
713. “Command channel review” means the process by which one or more
supervising CPD officers at or above the rank of Commander review the investigative findings
and recommendations.
714. “Command staff” means sworn officers at the rank of Commander or above (e.g.,
Commander or Superintendent) and civilian members (e.g., Director) assigned at the discretion
of the Superintendent and charged with holding strategic leadership positions within CPD.
715. “Complainant” means any person, including a CPD member, who makes a
Complaint against a CPD member.
716. “Complaint” means one or more allegations of misconduct reported to COPA,
CPD, or OIG.
717. “COPA” means the Civilian Office of Police Accountability.
718. “CPD” or “Department” means the Chicago Police Department and its agents,
officers, and employees (both sworn and civilian) in their official capacities.
719. “CPD member” or “member” means any sworn or civilian employee of CPD.
720. “CPD officer” or “officer” means any sworn CPD member at any rank.
721. “Crisis Intervention Team” or “CIT” means a first responder model of police-
based crisis intervention that involves the collaboration of community, health care, and advocacy
groups committed to improving the way law enforcement and the community responds to
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
216
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
individuals in crisis. The Crisis Intervention Team provides CPD members with support,
resources, education, and training to safely and effectively interact with individuals in crisis.
722. “Days” means calendar days unless otherwise specified.
723. “Decentralized training” means training approved by the Education and Training
Division or the Training Oversight Committee, with a uniform curriculum, that takes place at the
district or unit level rather than at the Academy or other centralized location and is not
necessarily required to be received by all members of the Department.
724. “Deputy PSIG” means the Deputy Inspector General for Public Safety of the City
of Chicago Office of Inspector General. In the event the Office of the Deputy PSIG is vacant, its
obligations under this Agreement run to the Officer of the Inspector General for the City of the
Chicago.
725. “District” means one of the geographic subdivisions designated by CPD, currently
numbering 22 in total, which together cover the entirety of the City and are each led by a
member of the command staff.
726. “Duty-related traumatic incident” means any police incident or action that a CPD
member is involved in or observes that has the potential to result in the member experiencing
emotional or psychological distress, ranging from mild to severe. For the purposes of the CPD
Traumatic Incident Stress Management Program, the following incidents have been identified as
traumatic incidents:
a. A firearms discharge incident, except for the destruction of an animal.
b. On-duty traffic crashes involving serious personal injury.
c. Other serious personal injury incidents involving CPD members occurring
while in the performance of duty.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
217
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
d. Any other great bodily harm or death incidents based on the actions or use of
force of a CPD member while in the performance of his or her duty.
In addition to the above incidents, any other incident where a CPD member sustains serious
physical or emotional trauma from a duty-related activity may be designated as a traumatic
incident by the appropriate CPD supervisor.
727. “Effective Date” means the day this Agreement is entered as an order of the
Court.
728. “Exonerated” means a finding where it is determined, by clear and convincing
evidence, that the conduct described in the allegation occurred but is lawful and proper.
729. “Field qualified” means a designation required for a probationary police officer to
successfully complete the Field Training and Evaluation Program.
730. “Field Training Officer” or “FTO” means a sworn member responsible for
providing field training to probationary police officers pursuant to CPD’s Field Training and
Evaluation Program.
731. “Final disciplinary decision” means the final decision of the Superintendent or his
or her designee regarding whether to issue or recommend discipline after review and
consideration of the investigative findings and recommendations, including after any additional
investigation conducted as a result of such review. For COPA investigations, the final
disciplinary decision occurs after the conclusion of the process described in Chicago Municipal
Code Section 2-78-130(a).
732. “Final disposition” means the status of a misconduct investigation after the final
disciplinary decision, and any grievance process, arbitration, Police Board proceeding or appeal
relating to the final disciplinary decision.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
218
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
733. “Guiding Principles” refers to the paragraphs included in the “Guiding Principles”
sections of this Agreement. They are not intended to impose substantive requirements subject to
compliance audits or assessments on either of the Parties. “Guiding Principles” are intended to
provide the Court, the Monitor, and the public with the context for the subsequent substantive
requirements of this Agreement and the overall goals for each section.
734. “Immediate supervisor” means a CPD officer at the rank of Sergeant or above (or
anyone acting in those capacities) and civilian CPD members with day-to-day oversight
responsibility for the CPD members under their direct command.
735. “Individual in crisis” means an individual who exhibits symptoms of known,
suspected, or perceived mental health conditions, including, but not limited to, mental illness,
intellectual or developmental disability, or co-occurring conditions, such as substance use
disorders.
736. “Intake process” means the system for processing all non-confidential complaints
and administrative notifications by COPA.
737. “Investigative findings and recommendations” means following a misconduct
investigation, COPA, BIA or the district’s issuance of investigative findings and
recommendations to the Superintendent of CPD, or his or her designee.
738. “Involved member” means a CPD member who is alleged to be involved in
misconduct.
739. “Juvenile” means an individual under the age of 18.
740. “Law Enforcement Medical and Rescue Training” or “LEMART” means training
designed to provide tactical medical and self-rescue capabilities, including the ability to identify
and tactically treat otherwise critical wounds and provide hemorrhage control.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
219
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
741. “LGBTQI” means lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex.
Gender-nonconforming, while not included in the LGBTQI acronym, is included wherever the
LGBTQI acronym is used in this Agreement.
742. “Licensed mental health professional” means any of the following as defined by
59 Ill. Admin. Code. 132/25: (a) a Licensed Practitioner of the Healing Arts (LPHA); (b) a
Licensed Social Worker (LSW) possessing at least a master’s degree in social work and licensed
under the Clinical Social Work and Social Work Practice Act, 225 ILCS 20, with specialized
training in mental health services or with at least two years’ experience in mental health services;
or (c) a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) possessing at least a master’s degree and
licensed under the Professional Counselor and Clinical Professional Counselor Licensing Act,
225 ILCS 107, with specialized training in mental health services or with at least two years’
experience in mental health services.
743. “Misconduct” means any violation of CPD policy or the law by a CPD member.
744. “Misconduct investigation” means the administrative investigation of a complaint
or an administrative notification that progresses past a preliminary investigation.
745. “Not sustained” means a finding where it is determined there is insufficient
evidence to prove the allegations by a preponderance of the evidence.
746. “OAG” means the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Illinois
747. “OEMC” means the Office of Emergency Management and Communications.
748. “Officer-involved shooting” means a firearm discharge by a CPD officer that
could potentially strike an individual.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
220
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
749. “Oleoresin capsicum device” or “OC Device” means any Department-authorized
implement capable of dispensing a nonflammable propellant, containing inflammatory agents
that occur naturally in cayenne peppers (oleoresin capsicum).
750. “Parties” means the State of Illinois, acting through the Office of the Attorney
General of the State of Illinois, and the City of Chicago.
751. “Performance Recognition System” or “PRS” means the electronic assessment
tool for assisting Department supervisors in recognizing and addressing job performance of
members under their command.
752. “Probationary police officer” or “PPO” means a new CPD officer who has
completed recruit training at the Academy and is receiving field training or is otherwise
employed on a provisional basis.
753. “Procedural justice” refers to a concept involving four central principles designed
to build public confidence in the police: (1) treating people with dignity and respect; (2) giving
individuals a chance to be heard during encounters; (3) making decisions fairly and
transparently, based on facts; and (4) conveying goodwill and trustworthiness.
754. “Require” means make mandatory, demand, compel, and enforce.
755. “Responding supervisor” means a CPD supervisor who immediately responds to
the scene when a level 2 or level 3 reportable use of force occurs.
756. “Roll call training” means in-service training that takes place at the district or unit
level during the beginning of a tour of duty. “Sexual assault” means an attempted or completed
act of nonconsensual sexual penetration, as defined in Sections 11-1.20 through 11-1.40 of the
Illinois Criminal Code of 2012.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
221
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
757. “Sexual abuse” means an attempted or completed act of nonconsensual sexual
conduct, as defined in Sections 11-0.1 and 11-1.50 through 11-1.60 of the Illinois Criminal Code
of 2012.
758. “Sexual misconduct” means any behavior by a CPD member that takes advantage
of the member’s position in law enforcement to misuse authority and power (including force) in
order to commit a sexual act, initiate sexual contact with another person, or respond to a
perceived sexually motivated cue (from a subtle suggestion to an overt action) from another
person. It also includes any sexual communication or behavior by a CPD member that would
likely be construed as lewd, lascivious, inappropriate, or conduct unbecoming of a member.
759. “Squadrol” means a unit assigned to a district vehicle that has the primary
function of transportation of arrestees in addition to field patrol duties.
760. “State” means the State of Illinois acting through the Office of the Attorney
General of the State of Illinois.
761. “Superintendent” means the Superintendent of CPD or a properly designated
Acting or Interim Superintendent.
762. “Supervisor” means a sworn CPD member at the rank of Sergeant or above (or
anyone acting in those capacities) and non-sworn CPD members with oversight responsibility for
other CPD members.
763. “Sustained” means a finding, where it is determined the allegation is supported by
a preponderance of the evidence
764. “Taser” means any Electronic Control Weapon, regardless of whether such
weapon is sold or manufactured under the brand-name “Taser.”
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
222
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
765. “Tele-communicators” means the Police Communication supervisors, call-takers,
and dispatchers employed by OEMC.
766. “Tour of duty” means the period of time during which a CPD member is
considered to be on duty. It may be a scheduled or unscheduled period, including periods
assigned to members in advance of the performance of work (i.e., watches or shifts) or time
spent on work performed outside of the assigned watch.
767. “Trauma-informed crisis intervention techniques” means appropriate strategies,
approaches, or tactics that consider symptoms of trauma and mental health conditions when
determining how to respond to and de-escalate incidents involving individuals in crisis.
768. “TRR” means the CPD form titled Tactical Response Report.
769. “TRR-I” means the CPD form titled Tactical Response Report – Investigation.
770. “TRR-R” means the CPD form titled Tactical Response Report – Review.
771. “Unfounded” means a finding where it is determined, by clear and convincing
evidence, that an allegation is false or not factual
772. "Unique tracking number" means a number assigned to a complaint or
administrative notification, including a Log Number, linked with all phases of the administrative
investigation and disciplinary recommendation, grievance process, arbitration, Police Board
proceeding, and appeals therefrom.
773. “Unit” means any bureau, group, section, organizational segment, or other subset
of CPD that is officially established within CPD’s organizational structure and commanded by
supervisory Department members.
774. “Will” means that the relevant provision imposes a mandatory duty.
775. “Youth” means an individual of the age 13 through 24.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
223
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
Respectfully submitted this __ day of ___, 2018.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
224
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
For Plaintiff STATE OF ILLINOIS:
_____________________________
[Signature block]
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
225
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
JULY 27, 2018
For Defendant CITY OF CHICAGO:
_____________________________
[Signature block]
SO ORDERED, this _______ day of _______________, 2018.
_____________________________
ROBERT M. DOW
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of Illinois
