International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT)
ISSN: 2249-8958 (Online), Volume-8 Issue-6, August, 2019
3162
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Retrieval Number F9267088619/2019©BEIESP
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F9267.088619
Journal Website: www.ijeat.org
.
Abstract: An attempt has been made in this paper to study the
effect on the mechanical properties of the concrete and hollow
concrete block when different types of fibres were added to the
mix. The two different types of fibres added include Steel fibres
with hooked end and of length 60mm at five different fibre ratios
of 2.5%, 2.75%, 3.0%, 3.25% and 3.5% and Nylon fibres having a
length of 18mm at the content of 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0%, 1.25% and
1.50%. The concept of fibre hybridization was also analyzed and
the effect was studied by preparing concrete mix with various
percentage combinations of steel and nylon fibres at a total fibre
ratio of 3% by weight of cement. The investigation focused on
finding the optimum values of fibres to be added and also carried
out the compressive strength and tensile strength of concrete with
and without fibres. The compressive strength of hollow concrete
blocks made with and without fibres was also analyzed. The
samples of concrete and hollow concrete blocks were cast and
immersed in water for a curing period of 28 days. The results on
strength of fibre added concrete and hollow concrete block
obtained was compared with the control mix result and the study
concludes that the steel fibre and nylon fibre added concrete and
hollow concrete block showed an improvement in the mechanical
properties for each fibre ratio considered. Out of the various
combinations of steel and nylon fibre tried, the best compressive
strength improvement was exhibited by the concrete mix with 3%
of the steel fibre without any addition of nylon fibres while the best
tensile strength improvement was shown by the concrete mix with
2.25% of steel fibre and 0.75% of nylon fibre.
Keywords: Compressive strength, Flexural Strength, Hooked
end steel fibres, Nylon fibres, Split tensile strength.
I. INTRODUCTION
By increasing the resistance to cracking in concrete, the
tensile strength and strain capacity of concrete can be
improved. Many researchers have taken efforts to increase
the resistance to cracking by adding different types of fibres
in concrete. The concrete thus obtained is known as Fibre
Reinforced Concrete (FRC) [1]. However, the fibres which
are used in FRC must have good mechanical properties,
should be durable when embedded into the cementitious
matrix [2]. The behaviour of FRC is influenced by the
dimensions such as length and diameter of the fibre used. It is
also affected by the shape of the fibre and also the type of
Revised Manuscript Received on August 30, 2019.
* Correspondence Author
Sunil J*, Civil Engineering, Noorul Islam Center for Higher Education,
Kumaracoil, Thuckalay, Tamil Nadu, India.
M S Ravikumar, Civil Engineering, PSN College of Engineering and
Technology, Thirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.
© The Authors. Published by Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and
Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC
BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
material [3][4]. The distribution of fibres in concrete also
depends on the above-mentioned parameters [5]. Many types
of fibres made of Polypropylene, Glass, Nylon, Steel, Natural
Cellulose has been used in FRC and they are widely used in
commercial applications [6][7][8][9][10]. Some researchers
are of the opinion that adding fibres in concrete not only
improves the tensile strength but also shows signs of
improvement in ductility, toughness and durability properties
of hardened concrete [11]. Many researchers used FRC with
combinations of fibres made of different materials or
geometry known as hybrid FRC (HyFRC). Such HyFRC’s
enhances the structural members' post-cracking response
[12]. In a well-designed HyFRC, the interaction between the
fibres results in better performance than that of FRC with a
single fibre [13][14]. Based on the suggestions of some
authors, the main objective of the use of fibres of different
types in combination in concrete is aimed at controlling
emergence of cracks on the cementitious materials, at
respective areas namely: (i) at different zones, (ii) at different
size levels and (iii) during different loading stages [15].
By adding steel fibres in concrete, both the tensile strength
and the compressive strength are improved. A lot of
researches have been carried out in the past to prove that the
Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete (SFRC) enhanced the
resistance in the areas of cracking and impact. The addition of
steel fibres in concrete impaired the workability because of
two reasons. The first reason is due to the elongated shape of
the fibre and the second reason is the large surface area
offered by the fibre. Therefore, the amount of fibre that can
be added is limited and the maximum amount needs to be
determined. In order to make the best use of the steel fibres
added, they need to be distributed homogeneously in the mix.
Or in other words, the fibres should not form clusters in the
mix while mixing. The commonly used areas where SFRC
includes industrial pavements where good control over the
shrinkage cracking is essential, for the lining of tunnels and
also for precast roof elements. Some studies claim that the
steel fibre added concrete shows notable improvement in
compressive strength [16] while other authors suggest that
this argument is not sustainable [17].
The incorporation of Nylon fibres in concrete showed
improved mechanical properties and the concrete also
exhibited satisfactory resistance in the micro-cracking
developed in the initial period. Because of the above property
nylon fibre reinforced concrete (NFRC) is used for casting
the deck slabs.
Mechanical Properties of Concrete and Hollow
Concrete Blocks Containing Steel and Nylon
Fibres
Sunil J, M S Ravikumar
Mechanical Properties of Concrete and Hollow Concrete Blocks Containing Steel and Nylon Fibres
3163
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Retrieval Number F9267088619/2019©BEIESP
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F9267.088619
Journal Website: www.ijeat.org
Type of
fibre
Shape of fibre
Specific
Gravity
(gram/cubic
cm)
Length
of the
fibre
(mm)
Diameter
of the
fibre
(mm)
Aspect
Ratio
(l/d)
Tensile
Strength
(MPa)
Steel
Hooked End
7.86
60
0.75
80
620
Nylon
Straight
1.14
20
0.03
666.67
440
Only a few studies have been carried out using nylon fibre
as reinforcement. Some authors [18] claim that the nylon
fibre added concrete decreases the strength due to
compression even though there is a remarkable increase in
the tensile strength.
In this study, an effort has been made to analyze the impact
of the inclusion of steel fibres, nylon fibres and hybridization
of both the fibres on the strength of concrete and hollow
concrete blocks. Steel fibres with hooked end with a length of
60mm were used at five different fibre ratios of 2.5%, 2.75%,
3.0%, 3.25% and 3.5%. Nylon fibres at the content of 0.5%,
0.75%, 1.0%, 1.25% and 1.50% were used in the work. The
length of the nylon fibre used was 18mm. The effect of fibre
hybridization was also analyzed by preparing three mixtures
which were obtained by combining steel and nylon fibres at a
total fibre ratio of 3% by weight of cement. The three
mixtures used in the study include FRC with 100% steel,
75% steel & 25% nylon and 50% steel & 50% nylon fibres.
The characteristics of the steel and nylon fibre used in the
work are listed in Table I.
II. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
A. Objectives
The foremost intention of this investigation was to
determine the properties of Steel fibre and Nylon fibre
reinforced concrete specimens made with different fîbre
dosages. The various properties were studied on the fresh
concrete as well as on the hardened concrete. The mechanical
properties of the fibre included concrete were also compared
with the properties of the concrete without fibre.
B. Scope
The steel fiber dosages chosen for the study were 0%,
2.50%, 2.75%, 3.0%, 3.25% and 3.5% by weight of cement.
The dosages selected for Nylon fibres include 0.5%, 0.75%,
1.0%, 1.25% and 1.5% by weight of cement. The steel and
nylon fibre combination includes three different mixes i.e.,
100% steel, 75% steel & 25% nylon and 50% steel & 50%
nylon fibres.
C. Methodology
Materials required for the experiments were procured and
their properties were found. The mix design of M15 grade
concrete was done as per IS 10262-2009. The fresh properties
of concrete for different fibre dosages were found using
slump value. Specimens for determining mechanical
properties of concrete and hollow concrete blocks with and
without steel fibres and nylon fibres were cast and immersed
in water for a curing period of 28 days. After the curing
period, the specimens were taken out of the water and they
are wiped clean and dried in open air. The specimens were
subjected to various strength test such as compressive
strength, flexural strength and split tensile strength of fibre
added concrete and the compressive strength of fibre added
hollow concrete blocks. The results obtained from the fibre
added specimens were compared with the control specimens.
Optimum fibre content was also obtained by analyzing the
various strength properties such as compressive, split tensile
and flexural. The methodology adopted in this paper is shown
in figure 1
Fig. 1. Experimental Methodology
III. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
A. Materials
The properties of each material in a concrete mix were
studied. As specified by relevant IS codes, different tests
were conducted for each material. For making the various
concrete mixes, Ordinary Portland cement, coarse aggregate,
M Sand, Steel fibres, Nylon fibres and water were used.
Cement: - OPC53 cement of 3.15 specific gravity was
utilized. The standard consistency obtained was 32%.
It recorded an initial setting time of 30 minutes and a
final setting time of 420 minutes. Standard mortar
cubes were immersed in water for a period of 28 days.
After the curing period of 28 days, the compressive
strength test was conducted and the value was
measured as 54 MPa. All properties of cement were in
accordance with IS269:1976.
Fine Aggregate: - M sand passing through 4.75mm IS
sieve as per IS: 383-1987 was used as the fine
aggregate. The various tests were performed for the
physical properties and the corresponding values
obtained are shown in Table II.
International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT)
ISSN: 2249-8958 (Online), Volume-8 Issue-6, August, 2019
3164
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Retrieval Number F9267088619/2019©BEIESP
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F9267.088619
Journal Website: www.ijeat.org
Coarse Aggregate: - Crushed stone aggregates of
nominal maximum 10mm size was used as the coarse
aggregate. It is ensured that they are free from
deleterious materials like silt content, clay and
contamination of chloride. The various test for
specific gravity, aggregate impact value, fineness
modulus and water absorption was carried out and the
values obtained are as given in Table III.
Table- II: Physical Properties of M Sand used
Sl. No
Properties
Values
1
Grading
Zone 2
2
Specific Gravity
2.57
3
Bulk Density
1560kg/m
3
4
Fineness Modulus
2.83
5
Water Absorption
1.2%
Table III: Properties of Coarse Aggregate
Sl. No
Properties
Values
1
Specific Gravity
2.65
2
Aggregate Impact Value
33.8%
3
Size
Max. Size 10mm
4
Fineness Modulus
6.02
5
Water Absorption
0.15%
Superplasticizer: - A commercially available
superplasticizer (Glenium) having the properties
shown in Table IV was used. The superplasticizer
added was 0.85 % by weight of cement to all mixes
conforming to IS 9103:1999.
Table IV: Properties of Superplasticizer
Sl. No
Description
Values
1
Colour
Amber
2
Structure
Poly Carboxylic Ether
Based
3
Density
1.082 -1.142 kg/ltrs
4
Chlorine content
< 0.1
5
Alkaline Content
< 3
Fibres: - Hooked end steel fibres and Nylon 6 fibres
were used in various proportions. The experiment
includes concrete with steel fibres, concrete with
nylon fibres and concrete with various combination of
steel and nylon fibres. In the investigation five
different percentages of 2.5%, 2.75%. 3%, 3.25% and
3.5% steel fibres by weight of cement and 0.5%,
0.75%, 1.0%, 1.25% and 1.5% nylon fibres by weight
of cement were incorporated to concrete.
Water: - Clean potable water tested in the laboratory
and which satisfies the drinking standards was used
for the preparation of specimens and also for curing of
the specimens.
B. Design of Concrete Mix
This process involves the selection of ingredients like
cement, aggregates and water in the required proportions.
The main intention of doing a mix design is to obtain a
concrete having desired strength and also an economical one.
The concrete thus prepared must be durable and also should
be workable. This process has been carried out and the final
mix proportion (cohesive) mentioned in Table V below is the
basis for the present investigation.
Table- V: Materials used in the Mix
Sl. No
Ingredients
Quantity ( kg/m
3
)
1
Water
150
2
Cement
319.8
3
Fine Aggregate
767.4
4
Coarse Aggregate
1151.4
5
Water Cement Ratio
0.50
Concrete cubes samples of size 150mm x 150mm x
150mm, Concrete cylinder specimens of size 150mm
diameter and 300mm height, Concrete beam samples of size
500mm x 100mm x 100mm and hollow concrete blocks with
dimensions 400 x 200 x 200mm were cast for conducting
various strength tests such as compressive, flexural and split
tensile test in the laboratory.
C. Test Program, Procedures and Testing Methods
Water cement ratio of 0.5 was used for preparing the
concrete samples. Different strength tests were carried out on
concrete added with steel fibres, concrete added with nylon
fibres and concrete added with different percentage
combinations of steel and nylon fibres. The various
percentage of fibres added to the concrete was taken by the
weight of the cement used. Five different percentages of
2.5%, 2.75%. 3%, 3.25% and 3.5% steel fibres by weight of
cement were added to concrete. The nylon fibers were also
placed in concrete randomly (0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0%, 1.25% and
1.5%) by weight of cement. An effort has also been taken in
the present investigation to study the strength of steel-nylon
hybrid fibre added to concrete for three different steel-nylon
fibres percentages. The percentages adopted includes 100%
steel and without nylon fibres, 75% steel and 25% nylon
fibres and 50% steel and 50% nylon fibres added to concrete.
The concrete cube samples were cast in 150mm cubic mould
in order to obtain the compressive strength. Hollow blocks of
size 400 x 200 x 200mm were also prepared to obtain the
compressive strength. Cylindrical steel moulds with
diameter 150mm and height 300mm are used for cylindrical
concrete specimens for obtaining the split tensile strength.
Concrete beams of size 500mm x 100mm x 100mm were cast
for performing the flexural strength test. All the specimens
were immersed in water for a period of 28 days before
testing.
After the curing period, all the specimens were taken out of
the water and they are wiped clean and dried in the open air.
Compression tests were carried out on 150mm cube
specimens using a compression testing machine as per IS
516-1959. Hollow concrete block specimens were also
subjected to compression test using universal testing
machine.
Mechanical Properties of Concrete and Hollow Concrete Blocks Containing Steel and Nylon Fibres
3165
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Retrieval Number F9267088619/2019©BEIESP
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F9267.088619
Journal Website: www.ijeat.org
Split tensile strength was executed on cylindrical
specimens using compression testing machine as per IS
5816:1999 and beam specimens were exposed to two-point
loading as per IS 516:1959 to study the flexural strength. All
the test was carried out on the concrete specimens made using
fibre added concrete and also on the concrete specimens
made without the addition of any type of fibre which is
specified as the control specimens.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
A. Compressive Strength
The compressive strength obtained on concrete cubes
made without the addition of fibres was 19.2N/mm
2
and
hollow concrete block compressive strength was 3.8 N/mm
2
.
The variation of cube compressive strength of different fibre
added concrete obtained after the curing period of 28 days is
shown in figure 2 and are presented in Table VI. The values
obtained after the test shows that the incorporation of steel
fibres, Nylon fibres and various combinations of steel and
nylon fibres improve the compressive strength. Also, the
cube compressive strength of nylon fibre added concrete
increases up to 1% fibre content and thereafter the strength is
decreased. The maximum cube compressive strength
obtained was 23.41N/mm
2
and the percentage increase of
strength after the curing period was obtained as 21.9% when
compared with the concrete without adding any fibre. When
different percentages of steel fibres were added to concrete,
the optimum was obtained as 3% and beyond that, the
strength was seen to be decreasing. The maximum strength
was obtained as 26.34N/mm
2
with a percentage increase of
37.1%.
Three combinations of steel and nylon fibres in concrete
was tried by keeping the fibre content to 3%. In the first case,
100% of steel fibre was used. The second case includes
specimens with 75% steel fibres and 25% nylon fibres in
concrete. The third case consists of specimens with 50% steel
fibres and 50% nylon fibres. Out of the above three cases
mentioned, the specimens with 100% steel fibres showed
maximum compressive strength.
The variation of compressive strength on different fibre
added hollow concrete block after a period of 28 days of
curing period is shown in figure 3 and are presented in Table
VI. As expected, the hollow block compressive strength was
obtained similar to the cube compressive strength with only a
slight difference in percentage increase in the strength. The
optimum fibre content was obtained as 1% in the case of
nylon fibre added hollow block concrete and it is 3% when
steel fibre was included in the concrete used for making
hollow blocks. The maximum compressive strength was
obtained as 4.6N/mm
2
which gives an increase of 21.1% and
5.21N/mm
2
with a percentage increase of 37.2% with nylon
and steel added hollow block respectively. In the case of
steel-nylon hybrid hollow concrete block, a result similar to
the cube compressive strength was obtained. The maximum
hollow block compressive strength was obtained when 100%
of steel fibres was added to concrete. The addition of nylon
fibres along with steel fibres reduces the compressive
strength.
The values obtained from the compressive test show that
the fibre included concrete perform better than the concrete
without fibres due to the ability of fibres to resist the crack
extension. The presence of fibres reduces the concentration
of stress at the tip of the cracks, changes the direction of
cracks and also the growth rate of the cracks is also delayed.
Table VI shows that the cube and hollow block compressive
strength increases from 9% to 22% for various percentages of
nylon fibre added to the concrete. Similarly, when different
percentages of steel fibres were added to concrete the cube
and hollow block compressive strength increases from 6.3%
to 37.2%. In order to improve the compressive strength in
concrete, the same table also
reveals that the consequence
Fig. 2. Cube Compressive Strength of Steel, Nylon
and Steel-Nylon hybrid fibre added concrete
Table- VI: Compressive strength, Split tensile Strength and Flexural Strength Test Results
Mix
No.
Mixture ID
Cube Compressive
Strength (MPa)
Hollow Block
Compressive Strength
(MPa)
Split Tensile Strength
(MPa)
Flexural Strength (MPa)
28 days
%
increase
28 days
%
increase
28 days
%
increase
28 days
%
increase
1
Plain
19.2
3.8
2.19
2.81
2
NF0.5
21.1
9.9
4.16
9.5
2.43
11
3.26
16
3
NF0.75
21.9
14.1
4.43
16.6
2.62
19.6
3.65
29.9
4
NF1.0
23.41
21.9
4.6
21.1
2.95
34.7
3.87
37.7
5
NF1.25
21.43
11.6
4.31
13.4
2.41
10
3.7
31.7
6
NF1.5
20.94
9.1
4.14
8.9
2.29
4.6
3.34
18.9
7
SF2.5
21.71
12.4
4.27
13.1
2.47
12.8
3.31
17.8
8
SF2.75
24.31
26.6
4.81
26.6
2.76
26
3.65
29.9
9
SF3.0
26.34
37.1
5.21
37.2
3.08
40.6
4.11
46.3
10
SF3.25
23.4
21.6
4.62
21.9
2.66
21.5
3.68
31
11
SF3.5
20.43
6.3
4.04
6.4
2.44
11.4
3.25
15.7
12
SF2.25NF0.75
25.19
31
4.98
31.2
3.16
44.3
4.27
49.1
13
SF1.5NF1.5
24.39
26.8
4.82
27
2.86
30.6
3.96
40.9
International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT)
ISSN: 2249-8958 (Online), Volume-8 Issue-6, August, 2019
3166
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Retrieval Number F9267088619/2019©BEIESP
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F9267.088619
Journal Website: www.ijeat.org
of adding steel fibres was more significant than adding nylon
fibres. The reason for showing this improvement in the
compressive strength is mainly because of the higher strength
and modulus of elasticity of steel fibres when compared with
nylon fibres. As a result, the efficiency of bridging the
macro-cracks has increased which in turn increased the
strength in compression.
Table VI also shows that when a small percentage of nylon
fibres is added along with the steel fibres, the cube and the
hollow block compressive strength attain 31.2% more than
that of the concrete without any fibres depending on the
replacement level of nylon and steel fibres. The results
obtained indicate that the compressive strength is decreased
when a portion of steel fibres is substituted with nylon fibres.
The mix which gave the best performance was the concrete
added with 3% steel fibres, which attained a cube and hollow
block compressive strength of 26.34N/mm
2
and 5.21N/mm
2
respectively at the end of curing period.
B. Split Tensile and Flexural Strengths
The variation of strength both in split and flexure of
different fibre added to the concrete are shown in fig 3 and
are presented in Table VI. The experimental results clearly
indicate that out of the steel and nylon fibres used, the steel
incorporated concrete gave a significant improvement in the
tensile strength. The strength is increased from 4.6% to
34.7% compared to the reference concrete when different
percentages of nylon fibres were added to concrete. The
maximum value was obtained as 2.95N/mm
2
for the optimum
fibre content of 1%. When different percentages of steel
fibres were added to concrete, the strength is increased from
12.8% to 40.6%. The maximum value of 3.08N/mm
2
was
obtained for the optimum fibre content of 3%. The results of
the hybrid fibre included concrete indicates a superior
increase of strength than concrete added with single fibre or
concrete made without fibres. Table VI indicates that Mix 12
gave a higher split tensile strength of 3.16N/mm
2
, 44.3%
higher than the strength of reference concrete. In comparison
with reference concrete, the table also demonstrates that the
other samples of concrete with the combination of any type of
fibres, exhibit better performance in the matter of strength.
In the investigation of flexural strength also, a similar
strength variation as that of split tensile strength can be seen.
The flexural strength increases from 16% to 37.7% and
15.7% to 46.3% for different percentage addition of nylon
and steel fibres in concrete respectively. The maximum value
of 3.87N/mm
2
is obtained when an optimum nylon fibre
content of 1% is added and 4.11N/mm
2
is obtained when 3%
of steel fibre is added to concrete.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 3. Strengths of different fibre reinforced concretes: a) Nylon fibre reinforced specimens b) Steel fibre reinforced
specimens and (c) Hybrid fibre reinforced specimens
Fig. 2. Strengths of different fibre reinforced concretes: a) Nylon fibre reinforced specimens b) Steel fibre reinforced
specimens and (c) Hybrid fibre reinforced specimens
Mechanical Properties of Concrete and Hollow Concrete Blocks Containing Steel and Nylon Fibres
3167
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Retrieval Number F9267088619/2019©BEIESP
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F9267.088619
Journal Website: www.ijeat.org
Therefore, with an addition of steel fibres in concrete, the
flexural strength achieved is of significant increase, as per
results given in Table VI. At the end of a curing period of 28
days, the hybrid steel nylon fibre reinforced concrete results
show that mix 12 obtains a higher value of 4.27N/mm
2
in
terms of flexural strength which is 49.1% higher than that of
concrete without fibres.
V. CONCLUSIONS
Conclusions given below are based on the analytical
discussions of the test results in this study:
1) The values obtained from the compression test shows
that the fibre included concrete perform better than the
concrete without fibres due to the ability of fibres to
resist the crack extension. This increase is mainly due to
the ability of the fibres to restrain the extension of
cracks.
2) The presence of fibres reduces the stress concentration at
the tip of the cracks, changes the direction of cracks and
also delay the growth rate of the cracks.
3) The optimum steel fibre content and nylon fibre content
was obtained as 3% and 1% by weight of cement.
4) The maximum cube compressive strength and hollow
concrete block compressive strength obtained on
concrete added with nylon fibres was 23.41N/mm
2
and
4.6 N/mm
2
respectively which is 21.9% and 21.1%
higher than the strength of concrete and hollow concrete
block without adding any fibres.
5) The maximum value of steel fibre reinforced concrete
cube and hollow concrete block compressive strength
obtained was 26.34 N/mm
2
and 5.21N/mm
2
respectively
which is 37.1% and 37.2% higher than the strength on
reference concrete and reference hollow concrete block.
6) Out of the steel and nylon fibres used, steel fibre added
concrete and hollow concrete blocks performed better
because of two factors. They have higher tensile strength
and higher value of modulus of elasticity.
7) The results of hybrid reinforced concrete and hollow
concrete blocks shows that the substitution of steel fibres
with nylon fibres reduces the compressive strength.
8) The maximum value of split tensile and flexural strength
of nylon fibre reinforced concrete obtained are
2.95N/mm
2
and 3.87N/mm
2
respectively which gives an
increase of 34.7% and 37.7% over the strength of
concrete without the addition of fibres.
9) The steel fibre reinforced concrete attained a maximum
value of split tensile and flexural strength as 3.08N/mm
2
and 4.11N/mm
2
with an increase of 40.6% and 46.3%
when compared with the strength of concrete without
fibres.
10) When 2.25% of steel fibres and 0.75% of nylon fibres
were added to the concrete, the highest split tensile and
flexural strength was obtained. The values obtained are
3.16N/mm
2
and 4.27N/mm
2
which shows an increase of
44.3% and 49.1% over the strength of concrete without
adding any fibre content.
REFERENCES
1. N. Banthia and J. Sheng, Fracture Toughness of Microfiber
Reinforced Cement Composites,” Cement & Concrete Composites,
vol. 18, 1996, pp. 251269.
2. X. Qian, X. Zhou, B. Mu, and Z. Li, “Fiber alignment and property
direction dependency of FRC extrudate,” Cement and Concrete
Research, vol. 33, 2003, pp. 15751581.
3. N. Buratti, C. Mazzotti, and M. Savoia, “Post-cracking behaviour of
steel and macro-synthetic fibre-reinforced concrete,” Construction and
Building Materials, vol. 25, 2011, pp. 27132722.
4. S. Wang, M.-H. Zhang, and S. T. Quek, “Mechanical behaviour of
fibre-reinforced high-strength concrete subjected to high strain-rate
compressive loading,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 31,
2012, pp. 111.
5. S. T. Kang, B. Y. Lee, J.-K. Kim, and Y. Y. Kim, “The effect of fibre
distribution characteristics on the flexural strength of steel
fibre-reinforced ultra-high-strength concrete,” Construction and
Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 5, 2011, pp. 24502457.
6. M. Hassanpour, P. Shafigh, and H. Bin Mahmud, “Lightweight
aggregate concrete fibre reinforcement A review,” Construction and
Building Materials, vol. 37, 2012, pp. 452461.
7. C. Ming-Xiang, L. I. Bei-xing, C. Fang, and L. Lu-ping, “The
Mechanical Properties of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete,”
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, 2004, pp.
6871.
8. H. Mazaheripour, S. Ghanbarpour, S. H. Mirmoradi, and I.
Hosseinpour, “The effect of polypropylene fibres on the properties of
fresh and hardened lightweight self-compacting concrete,”
Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 1, 2011, pp.
351358.
9. Chandramouli K., S. S. Rao, Pannirselvam N, S. T. Sekhar, and
Sravana P, “Strength Properties of Glass Fibre Concrete,” ARPN
Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 5, no. 4, 2010, pp.
16.
10. L. A. Qureshi and A. Ahmed, “An Investigation on Strength Properties
of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete,” International Journal of
Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, 2013, pp.
25672572.
11. K. G. Kuder and S. P. Shah, “Processing of high-performance
fiber-reinforced cement-based composites,” Construction and Building
Materials, vol. 24, no. 2, 2010, pp. 181186.
12. S. H. Park, D. J. Kim, G. S. Ryu, and K. T. Koh, “Tensile behaviour of
Ultra-High-Performance Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete,” Cement
and Concrete Composites, vol. 34, no. 2, 2012, pp. 172184.
13. W. Yao, J. Li, and K. Wu, “Mechanical properties of hybrid
fiber-reinforced concrete at low fibre volume fraction,” Cement and
Concrete Research, vol. 33, 2003, pp. 2730.
14. E. T. Dawood and M. Ramli, “Development of high strength flowable
mortar with hybrid fibre,” Construction and Building Materials, vol.
24, 2010, pp. 10431050.
15. S. Yazici, G. Inan, and V. Tabak, “Effect of aspect ratio and volume
fraction of steel fibre on the mechanical properties of SFRC,”
Construction & Building Materials, vol. 21, 2007, pp. 12501253.
16. T. Simões, H. Costa, D. Dias-da-Costa, and E. Júlio, “Influence of
fibres on the mechanical behaviour of fibre reinforced concrete
matrixes,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 137, 2017, pp.
548556.
17. K. Hung, M. See, H. Goh, U. J. Alengaram, and P. Visintin,
“Mechanical, toughness, bond and durability-related properties of
lightweight concrete reinforced with steel fibres,” Materials and
Structures, vol. 50, no. 46, 2017, pp. 114.
18. M. Khan and M. Ali, “Use of glass and nylon fibres in concrete for
controlling early age micro cracking in bridge decks,” Construction
and Building Materials, vol. 125, 2016, pp. 800808.
AUTHORS PROFILE
Sunil J is currently pursuing his PhD in Civil
Engineering at Noorul Islam Centre for Higher
Education, Thuckalay, Tamil Nadu. His main research
interest is in the field of Structural Engineering. He
received MTech degree in Construction Management
and Structural Engineering from TKM College of
Engineering, Kollam in 2010. He completed his BTech degree in Civil
Engineering from College of Engineering, Trivandrum in 2001.
International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT)
ISSN: 2249-8958 (Online), Volume-8 Issue-6, August, 2019
3168
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication
Retrieval Number F9267088619/2019©BEIESP
DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.F9267.088619
Journal Website: www.ijeat.org
Dr M S Ravikumar is currently working as Professor
and Principal in PSN College of Engineering and
Technology, Thirunelveli. India. He has authored
number of papers in reputed national and international
journals. He has been guiding Projects and Dissertations
of post graduate and PhD students in Civil Engineering.
He has been a resource person for a number of FDPs on
various areas of research and technology as part of academic career.